Arthur Keith

Infobox Scientist
name = PAGENAME
box_width =


image_size =150px
caption = PAGENAME
birth_date = February 5, 1866
birth_place =
death_date = January 7, 1955
death_place =
residence =
citizenship =
nationality = Scottish
ethnicity =
field = anatomy anthropology
work_institutions =
alma_mater =
doctoral_advisor =
doctoral_students =
known_for = group selection
author_abbrev_bot =
author_abbrev_zoo =
influences =
influenced =
prizes =
religion =
footnotes =

Sir Arthur Keith (February 5, 1866 – January 7, 1955) was a Scottish anatomist and anthropologist, who became a fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of England and Hunterian Professor and conservator of the Hunterian Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons in London (not to be confused with the Hunterian Museum Glasgow Scotland; the two were founded by brothers). A leading figure in the study of human fossils, he became President of the Royal Anthropological Institute. The latter role stimulated his interest in the subject of human evolution, leading to the publication of his book "A New Theory of Human Evolution," in which he supported the idea of group selection. Where others had postulated that physical separation could provide a barrier to interbreeding, allowing groups to evolve along different lines, Keith introduced the idea of cultural differences as providing a mental barrier, emphasising territorial behaviour, and the concept of the 'in-group' and 'out-group'. Man had evolved, he claimed, through his tendency to live in small competing communities, a tendency which was at root determined by racial differences in his 'genetic substrate'. Writing just after World War II he particularly emphasised the racial origins of anti-Semitism, and in 'A New Theory of Evolution' he devoted a chapter to the topics of anti-Semitism and Zionism in which he argued that Jews live by a 'dual code'.

Biography

Born in Aberdeen, he obtained a Bachelor of Medicine at the University of Aberdeen in 1888. He travelled to Siam on a gold mining trip in 1889 where he gathered plants for Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew in London in his capacity as a plant collector assistant for the Botanical Survey of the Malay Peninsula.

On returning to Britain in 1892, Keith studied anatomy at University College London and at the University of Aberdeen. It was at Aberdeen where Keith won the first Struthers Prize in 1893 for his demonstration of ligaments in humans and other apes. In 1894, he was made a fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. In 1908, as he says in 'A New Theory of Evolution', he was 'put in charge of the vast treasury of things housed in the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons', which brought about a shift in his interest from anatomy to the pursuit of 'the machinery of human evolution'.

He studied primate skulls, and in 1897 he published "An Introduction to the Study of Anthropoid Apes". Other works include "Human Embryology and Morphology" (1902), "Ancient Types of Man" (1911), "The Antiquity of Man" (1915), "Concerning Man's Origins" (1927), and "A New Theory of Human Evolution," (1948).

Keith was editor of the "Journal of Anatomy" between 1915 and 1936.

He was knighted in 1921, and he published "New Discoveries" in 1931. In 1932, he helped found a research institute in Downe, Kent, where he worked until his death.

Piltdown Man hoax

Keith was a strong proponent of the Piltdown Man. Long after his death, a theory arose that he might have been a co-conspirator of the hoax along with Charles Dawson. "Piltdown: A Scientific Forgery", written by Frank Spencer after completing the research of Ian Langham (an Australian historian of science who suspected Keith, and died in 1984), explored the link between Keith and Dawson and suggested it was Keith who prepared the fake specimens for Dawson to plant. Phillip Tobias details the history of the investigation of the hoax, dismissing other theories, and listing inconsistencies in Keith's statements and actions. [Current Anthropology (June 1992) [http://www.clarku.edu/~PILTDOWN/map_prim_suspects/KEITH/Keith_prosecution/apprais_Keith.html] . Retrieved on 2008-06-08.] More recent evidence points to Martin Hinton, [ [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/piltdown2003.html TalkOrigins] . Retrieved on 2008-06-08.] but the case remains open.

Writings

"Concerning Man's Origins"

"Concerning Man's Origins", a book based on his Presidential Address at the British Association in 1927, contains a chapter entitled 'Capital as a Factor in Evolution' in which he proposes an interesting explanation for Britain's leading role in the development of Industrial Society. Essentially he argues that the cold unwelcoming climate of Britain selected those who came here for a special ability to store up food and supplies for the winter - those who didn't died out. This 'capitalism' provided a secure way of life with time to think and experiment, for a population that had been selected for inventiveness and resourcefulness. Out of this special population sprang the Industrial Revolution, centred on the colder Northern counties of England like Lancashire and Yorkshire where the high-tech developments of the time took place in spinning and weaving. This is a rare book today, which does not appear to be available as a reprint.

"A Manual of Practical Anatomy" (1901)

with Alfred William Hughes

"Human Embryology and Morphology" (1902, 6th ed. 1949)

"The Antiquity of Man" (1915, 2d ed. 1925)

"A New Theory of Human Evolution" (1948)

In "A New Theory of Human Evolution", Keith puts forward his ideas on the co-evolution of Human beings, Races, and Cultures, covering topics such as Patriotism, Resentment and Revenge, Morality, Leadership, Nationalism, and Race. His particular theory emphasises the ideas of 'In-group versus Out-group', and the 'Amity-Enmity Complex'. Often quoted, but very hard to get, this book covers, in one concise and very readable work, a whole lot of topics that are extremely relevant today, since discussion of such ideas was revived with E O Wilson's publication of 'Sociobiology' and now thrives under the title of 'Evolutionary Psychology'.

One chapter, entitled "The Jews as a Nation and as a Race", tackles what is often referred to as 'the Jewish Question', postulating that the Jews are a special case of a race that has evolved to live as the 'out-group' amongst other races, developing a special culture that enables it to survive by means of strong cultural traditions that bind the 'in-group' with unusual loyalty and defensiveness. Such claims are very controversial today.

This book, is very hard to obtain, and it would seem that original copies exist only in small numbers, and that modern reprints do not exist. It latter is available online, however; see link below.

Quotations

cquote| "Why is it that feelings which accompany the practice of every kind of reprisal or of revenge are painful? Indeed, all the feelings which enter into the practice of the code of enmity are unpleasant and abiding. The explanation I offer is that resentment is unpleasant to make sure that it will be put into execution, so giving relief by gratification."

"I have sought to prove that the code of enmity is a necessary part of the machinery of evolution. He who feels generous towards his enemy, and more especially if he feels forgiveness towards him, has in reality abandoned the code of enmity and so has given up his place in the turmoil of evolutionary competition. Hence the benign feeling of perfect peace that descends on him."

Sir Arthur Keith, ‘A new Theory of Human Evolution‘ 1948

"Another mark of race possessed by the Jews must be mentioned. Their conduct is regulated by a ‘dual code‘; their conduct towards their fellows is based on one code (amity), and that towards all who are outside their circle on another (enmity). The use of the dual code, as we have seen, is a mark of an evolving race. My deliberate opinion is that racial characters are more strongly developed in the Jews than in any other race."

Sir Arthur Keith, ‘A new Theory of Human Evolution‘ 1948

"The German Fuhrer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution. He has failed, not because of the theory of evolution, but because he has made three fatal blunders in its application."

Sir Arthur Keith, 'Evolution and Ethics', Putnam, New York, 1947, p. 230.

Notes

References

*Keith, A. Anatomy in Scotland during the lifetime of Sir John Struthers (1823-1899). Edin. Med. J. 1912; 8: 7-33.
*cite journal
quotes = yes
last=Read
first=Raymond C
authorlink=
year=2007|month=Dec.
title=Arthur Keith, the anatomist who envisioned herniosis
journal=
volume=11
issue=6
pages=469-71
publisher = | location = | issn =
pmid = 17687509
doi = 10.1007/s10029-007-0273-9
bibcode = | oclc =| id = | url = | language = | format = | accessdate = | laysummary = | laysource = | laydate = | quote =
*cite journal
quotes = yes
year=1975|month=Aug.
title=A. M. Keith
journal=Br Med J
volume=3
issue=5982
pages=549
publisher = | location = | issn =
pmid = 1100174
bibcode = | oclc =| id = | url = | language = | format = | accessdate = | laysummary = | laysource = | laydate = | quote =

External links

* [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=265&action=archive Journal of Anatomy] - Archive
* [http://www.whonamedit.com/doctor.cfm/859.html Sir Arthur Keith Biography] - Who Named It?
* [http://reactor-core.org/new-theory-of-human-evolution.html A New Theory of Human Evolution (full text at reactor-core.org)]
* [http://reactor-core.org/evolution-and-ethics.html Evolution and Ethics (full text at reactor-core.org)]
* [http://www.designeduniverse.com/evolutionandethics.htm Evolution and Ethics (full text at designeduniverse.com)]

Persondata
NAME=Keith, Arthur
ALTERNATIVE NAMES=
SHORT DESCRIPTION= anatomy, anthropology
DATE OF BIRTH= February 5, 1866
PLACE OF BIRTH=
DATE OF DEATH= January 7, 1955
PLACE OF DEATH=