O'Kelly v. Trusthouse Forte plc
- O'Kelly v. Trusthouse Forte plc
"O'Kelly v. Trusthouse Forte plc" [1983] ICR 728 is a notorious UK labour law case, which held that a requirement for a contract is "mutuality of obligation" between the parties.
Facts
Some waiters were hired through an employment agency to do dinner functions. They were called up for the occasion, and in their contracts it was written that they had no obligation to come, and by the same token the employer had no obligation to call them. They tried to organise a trade union, and were dismissed. They argued that they were dismissed unfairly, because trade union legislation (now in the Trade Union (Labour Relations) Consolidation Act 1992 s.156) gave them a right to not be discriminated against as "workers". However the employer argued that the unfair dismissal legislation (now, Employment Rights Act 1996 s.94) only covered "employees" - something different (now defined in ERA 1996 s.230) - which did not cover their situation. Representing the employer was Alexander Irvine QC, later the Lord Chancellor.
Judgment
Sir John Donaldson MR held the waiters were not "employees" (either of the function hall or the agency) because they did not, technically, have to turn up to work for a shift, and they could be sacked at any time. Sir John Donaldson MR said therefore, that the contract lacked "mutuality" and could not be described as one between an "employee" and "employer". Because they were not "employees" they did not have a right to claim unfair dismissal. And so even though the trade union discrimination legislation protected them, they did not have access to the tribunal to make those rights effective.
The legal effect was to put them in the same boat as the "self employed" and that they were not covered by the Act. The practical effect was they had no right to fair dismissal and could be sacked for organising a trade union.
ee also
*UK agency worker law
*"Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd. v. Minister of Pensions and National Insurance"
*"Nethermere (St. Neots) Ltd. v. Gardiner"
*"Carmichael v. National Power plc"
Notes
Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc — Court Court of Appeal Citation(s) [1983] ICR 728 Keywords Employment cont … Wikipedia
Muscat v Cable & Wireless Plc — Cable Wireless plc v Muscat Court Court of Appeal Citation(s) [2006] EWCA Civ 220, [2006] ICR 975 … Wikipedia
United Kingdom agency worker law — refers to the law which regulates people s work through employment agencies in the United Kingdom. Though statistics are disputed, there are currently between half a million and one and a half million agency workers in the UK, and probably over… … Wikipedia
Employment contract in English law — An employment contract in English law is a specific kind of contract whereby one person performs work under the direction of another. The two main features of a contract is that work is exchanged for a wage, and that one party stands in a… … Wikipedia
Employment Rights Act 1996 — Infobox UK Legislation short title=Employment Rights Act 1996 parliament=Parliament of the United Kingdom long title=... statute book chapter=1996 c. 18 introduced by= territorial extent=England and Wales; Scotland; Northern Ireland royal assent … Wikipedia
Nethermere (St. Neots) Ltd. v. Gardiner — And Another [1984] ICR 612 is a British labour law case in the Court of Appeal in the field of home work and vulnerable workers. Many labour and employment rights, such as unfair dismissal [s.94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996] , in Britain… … Wikipedia
Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gardiner — Court Court of Appeal Citation(s) [1984] ICR 612 Case history Prior action(s) … Wikipedia
Dacas v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd — Court Court of Appeal Citation(s) [2004] EWCA Civ 217 … Wikipedia
Muschett v H M Prison Service — Court Court of Appeal Citation(s) [2010] EWCA Civ 25 Case opinions Rimer LJ Keywords … Wikipedia
Market Investigations Ltd v Minister for Social Security — Court Court of Appeal Citation(s) [1969] 2 QB 173 Keywords Contract of employment Market Investigations Ltd v Minister for Social Security [1969] 2 QB 173 is a UK labour law case concerning the scope of protection for people to employment rights … Wikipedia
