Turnitin

Infobox Software
name = Turnitin



caption = A sample Turnitin report page, with explanations
author =
developer = iParadigms, LLC
latest release version =
latest release date =
latest preview version =
latest preview date =
operating system =
platform = Internet
genre = educational
license =
website = http://www.turnitin.com or http://www.submit.ac.uk (UK)

Turnitin (also known as Turnitin.com) is an Internet-based plagiarism-detection service created by iParadigms, LLC. Institutions (typically universities and high schools) buy licenses to submit essays to the Turnitin website, which checks the document for plagiarism.

Students may be required by schools to submit essays to Turnitin, as a deterrent to plagiarism. This has been a source of criticism, with some students refusing to do so in the belief that requiring it constitutes a presumption of guilt. Additionally, critics have alleged that use of the software violates educational privacy and intellectual property laws.

Parent company iParadigms, LLC, also offers a similar plagiarism detection service for newspaper editors and book publishers called iThenticate, and run the informational website Plagiarism.org.Other services marketed under the Turnitin brand are aimed at the educators' market, such as grade marking and peer review services.

Function

Turnitin checks for possible plagiarism by comparing submitted papers to several databases using a proprietary algorithm. It scans its own database(s), and also has licensing agreements with large academic proprietary databases.

Databases

*A current and extensively archived copy of the publicly accessible internet. The company uses a webcrawler to continually archive the web, except for robots.txt exclusions.
*Millions of commercial pages from books, newspapers, and journals;
*Tens of millions of student papers already submitted to Turnitin.

tudent paper database

The essays students submit are stored as part of the database used to check for plagiarism. This prevents the use of one student's paper by another student by identifying matching text between papers. Supporters state that maintaining a student's paper in the database protects the student's intellectual property (or that of the university, in some cases) from future plagiarism. However, in the view of others, this caching of students' papers amounts to copyright violation.

Classroom integration

Teachers may submit student papers to Turnitin.com as individual files, a bulk upload, or a ZIP file. Teachers can also set up the assignment analysis options so that each student can review their originality reports before their final submission. A peer-review option is also available, should instructors wish to use that service in their courses.

Some virtual learning environments can be configured to support Turnitin, so that student assignments can be automatically submitted for originality analysis. Moodle, WebCT, Blackboard and ANGEL all support Turnitin integration with course sections and assignments. [cite web |url= http://www.turnitin.com/static/index.html |title= Turnitin |accessdate= 2007-04-15 |publisher= iParadigms, LLC ]

Criticism

While most people agree that combatting plagiarism is important, Turnitin critics argue that:
# Turnitin violates student privacy and intellectual property rights, especially when archiving student papers without students' knowledge or permission;
# Turnitin profits from students' work without paying royalties;
# Turnitin creates an adversarial relationship between teachers and students because it fosters an atmosphere of distrust and renders students "guilty-until-proven-innocent"
# Turnitin distributes copies of students' papers to third parties, which destroys the future marketability of students' intellectual property.
# The student is forced to accept Turnitin's user agreement under duress considering the requirement to use the service by their respective institutions without prior notice.

Response

Privacy

The U.S. federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) prohibits disclosing confidential information about students to third parties without their or their families' permission. Critics of Turnitin argue that sending papers to Turnitin without student permission thus violates their rights.

Turnitin claims its archiving of student papers complies with FERPA, since the statute only applies at two points: when it is transmitted to them, and when it is released from the data base when a match is found with another submission. In the former case it is not considered part of the educational record since it has not yet been graded, and in the latter it does not divulge personal identifying information.Foley & Lardner; July 2002; [http://turnitin.com/static/pdf/us_Legal_Document.pdf Turnitin U.S. Legal Document] , retrieved September 29, 2006, 2, 5.] However, the Family Compliance Policy Office, the department of the Department of Education responsible for enforcing FERPA, has stated that institutions may submit student papers to Turnitin only if they remove all personally identifiable information from the papers [cite web
url = http://www.naspa.org/policy/FERPA2006.pdf
title = Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)
accessdate = 2007-01-28
author = Family Policy Compliance Office
year = 2006] .

The Student Union at Dalhousie University has criticized the use of Turnitin at Canadian universities because the American government may be able to access the submitted papers and personal information in the database under the USA PATRIOT Act. [cite web |url= http://www.dalgazette.ca/html/module/displaystory/story_id/1050/edition_id/18/format/html/displaystory.html |title= DSU takes on Turnitin.com |accessdate= 2007-04-15 |last= McDiarmid |first= Jess |date= 2006-03-16 |work= Gazette |publisher= Dalhousie University ]
Mount Saint Vincent University became the first Canadian university to ban Turnitin's service partly because of implications of the USA PATRIOT Act. [cite web |url= http://www.excal.on.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2532&Itemid=2 |title= Turnitin risks privacy |accessdate= 2007-04-15 |last= Halfnight |first= Drew |coauthors= Kristina Jarvis and Josh Visser |date= 2006-11-15 |work= Excalibur Online |publisher= York University ]

Possible violation of student copyright

Since Turnitin archives all papers it receives and sells its services, including that database, for profit, it has also been charged with violating student copyright since students are not compensated for the use of their work. Turnitin founder John Barrie claims the company is merely making fair use of student work since, despite iParadigms profiting from the sale of the software, it is ultimately for educational purposes. The company also says the archiving does not detract from students' future ability to profit from their work, and in fact should even help them by guaranteeing its originality.Fact|date=October 2008

Lawyers for the company also claim that student work is covered under the theory of implied license to evaluate, since it would be pointless to write the essays if they were not meant to be graded. That implied license thus grants permission to copy, reproduce and preserve, it says. Dissertations and theses, the company's lawyers note, also carry with them the implied permission to archive in a publicly accessible collection such as a university library.Foley & Lardner, "Id.", 3-5.]

University of Minnesota Law School professor Dan Burk counters that the company's use of the papers may not meet the fair-use test for several reasons:

*The company copies the entire paper and not just a portion;
*Students' work is often original, interpretive and creative rather than just a compilation of established facts, and
*Turnitin is a commercial enterprise. [Foster, Andrea L.; May 17, 2002; [http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i36/36a03701.htm Plagiarism-Detection Tool Creates Legal Quandary] ; "The Chronicle of Higher Education"; retrieved September 29, 2006]

Presumption of guilt

Some students also argue that requiring them to submit papers to Turnitin creates a presumption of guilt, which may violate not only scholastic disciplinary codes but also applicable local laws and judicial practice. Some teachers and professors also support this argument when attempting to discourage their schools from joining Turnitin [cite web
url = http://bedfordstmartins.com/technotes/techtiparchive/ttip060501.htm
title = Turnitin.com, a Pedagogic Placebo for Plagiarism
accessdate = 2007-01-28
last = Carbone
first = Nick
date= 2001] .

Controversy and litigation

In one well-publicized dispute over mandatory Turnitin submissions, a student named Jesse Rosenfeld at McGill University declined to pass his academic work along to Turnitin. The University Senate eventually ruled that Rosenfeld's assignments were to be graded without the use of Turnitin. [cite web |url= http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2004/01/16/mcgill_turnitin030116 |title= "McGill student wins fight over anti-cheating website" |accessdate= 2007-04-15 |date= 2004-01-16 |publisher= CBC News ] In 2005 another student at McGill University, Denise Brunsdon, refused to submit her assignment to Turnitin.com and won a similar ruling from the Senate Committee on Student Grievances. [cite web |url= http://www.mcgilldaily.com/view.php?aid=4615 |title= "Students: 2, Turnitin: 0" |accessdate= 2007-04-15 |last= Churchill |first= Liam |date= 2005-12-02 |work= McGill Daily ] Many other Canadian universities are currently in the process of either total or partial ban of this service. Namely, in March 2006, Mount Saint Vincent University in Nova Scotia banned the submission of students’ academic work to Turnitin.com and any similar software. This decision was granted after the students’ union alerted the university community of their legal and privacy concerns associated with the use of Turnitin.com and other anti-plagiarism devices that profit from students’ academic work. This was the first campus-wide ban of its kind in Canada.

It is notable, that presently at Ryerson University (Toronto, ON), it is entirely up to the students whether to submit their work to Turnitin.com or to make alternate arrangements with the instructor.Fact|date=October 2008

On March 27, 2007, with the help of an intellectual property attorney, two students from McLean High School (with assistance from the Committee For Students' Rights) and two students attending Desert Vista High School, filed suit in United States Circuit Court (Eastern District, Alexandria Division) alleging copyright infringement by iParadigms, Turnitin's parent company. [cite web
url = http://www.dontturnitin.com/images/A.V._et._al._Versus_iParadigms,_LLC_Complaint.pdf
title = Complaint of Copyright Infringement
accessdate = 2007-03-29
last = Vanderhye
first = R.
date= 2007
format = PDF] Nearly a year later, Judge Claude M. Hilton granted summary judgment on the students' complaint in favor of iParadigms/Turnitin. [Citation
last = Hilton
first = Claude
title = Memorandum Opinion
publisher = United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division
year = 2008
url = http://www.iparadigms.com/iParadigms_03-11-08_Opinion.pdf] The students have appealed the ruling. [cite web |url=http://www.boston.com/news/education/k_12/articles/2008/04/23/students_appeal_ruling_favoring_plagiarism_detection_service/ |title=Students appeal ruling favoring plagiarism detection service |author=Barakat, Matthew |date=2008-04-28 |accessdate=2008-04-29]

References

ee also

*Plagiarism
*Ithenticate

External links

* [http://www.turnitin.com/ Turnitin]
* [http://www.plagiarism.org Plagiarism.org]
* [http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/1588/taking-a-hard-line-on-turnitin The Chronicle Online - Taking a Hard Line on Turnitin]
* [http://ccccip.org/files/CCCC-IPpositionstatementDraft%209%2016%2006.pdf CCCC-IP Caucus Recommendations Regarding Academic Integrity and the Use of Plagiarism Detection Services] - recommendations authored by the Caucus on Intellectual Property and Composition/Communication Studies
* [http://www.dontturnitin.com/ DontTurnitin.com - Turnitin Controversy]