- Philosophical language
A philosophical language is any
constructed language that is constructed fromfirst principles , like a logical language, but may entail a strong claim of absolute perfection or transcendent or even mystical truth rather than satisfaction of pragmatic goals. Philosophical languages were popular inEarly Modern times, partly motivated by the goal of recovering the lost Adamic orDivine language . The term ideal language is sometimes used near-synonymously, though more modern philosophical languages such as Toki Pona are less likely to involve such an exalted claim of perfection.In most older philosophical languages, and some newer ones, words are constructed from a limited set of morphemes that are treated as "elemental" or fundamental. "Philosophical language" is sometimes used synonymously with "taxonomic language", though more recently there have been several conlangs constructed on philosophical principles which are not taxonomic. Vocabularies of
oligosynthetic language s are made ofcompound word s, which are coined from a small (theoretically minimal) set ofmorpheme s; oligoisolating languages, such as Toki Pona, similarly use a limited set of root words but produce phrases which remain series of distinct words.Suzette Haden Elgin 'sLáadan is designed to lexicalize and grammaticalize the concepts and distinctions important to women, based onmuted group theory .Sonja Elen Kisa 'sToki Pona is based on minimalistic simplicity, incorporating elements ofTaoism .A priori languages are constructed languages where the vocabulary is invented directly, rather than being derived from other existing languages (as with
Esperanto orInterlingua ). Philosophical languages are almost all a priori languages, but most "a priori" languages are not philosophical languages. For example,J. R. R. Tolkien 'sQuenya andSindarin , andMarc Okrand 's Klingon, are both "a priori" but not philosophical languages: they are meant to seem like natural languages, even though they have no genetic relation to any natural languages.History
Work on philosophical languages was pioneered by
Francis Lodwick ("A Common Writing", 1647; "The Groundwork or Foundation laid (or So Intended) for the Framing of a New Perfect Language and a Universal Common Writing", 1652), SirThomas Urquhart ("Logopandecteision ", 1652),George Dalgarno ("Ars signorum", 1661), andJohn Wilkins ("Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language", 1668). Those were systems of hierarchical classification that were intended to result in both spoken and written expression. In 1855, English writer George Edmonds modified Wilkins' system, leaving its taxonomy intact, but changing the grammar, orthography and pronunciation of the language in an effort to make it easier to speak and to read. [Edmonds, George. "A Universal Alphabet, Grammar, and Language".Richard Griffin and Company , London and Glasgow, 1855.]Gottfried Leibniz created "lingua generalis" in 1678, aiming to create a lexicon of characters upon which the user might perform calculations that would yield true propositions automatically; as a side-effect he developedbinary calculus .These projects aimed not only to reduce or model grammar, but also to arrange all human knowledge into "characters" or hierarchies. This idea ultimately led to the "
Encyclopédie ", in theAge of Enlightenment . Leibniz and the encyclopedists realized that it is impossible to organize human knowledge unequivocally as a tree, and so impossible to construct an "a priori" language based on such a classification of concepts. Under the entry "Charactère",D'Alembert critically reviewed the projects of philosophical languages of the preceding century.After the "Encyclopédie", projects for "a priori" languages moved more and more to the lunatic fringe. Individual authors, typically unaware of the history of the idea, continued to propose taxonomic philosophical languages until the early 20th century (for example, Ro). More recent philosophical languages have usually moved away from taxonomic schemata, such as 21th century
Ithkuil andArahau .References
*
Alan Libert , "A Priori Artificial Languages".Lincom Europa , Munich, 2000. ISBN 3-89586-667-9
*Umberto Eco , "The search for the perfect language ", 1993.ee also
*
Engineered language
*Natural semantic metalanguage
*Mirad Mirad (aka Unilingua) is a philosophical language
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.