Policy Ineffectiveness Proposition

Policy Ineffectiveness Proposition

The Policy Ineffectiveness Proposition (PIP) is a new classical theory proposed in 1976 by Thomas J. Sargent and Neil Wallace based upon the theory of rational expectations. It posits that governments are powerless in the management of output and employment in an economy.


Prior to the work of Sargent and Wallace, macroeconomic models were largely based on the adaptive expectations assumption. Many economists found this unsatisfactory since it assumes that agents may repeatedly make systematic errors and can only revise their expectations in a backward-looking way. Under adaptive expectations, agents do not revise their expectations even if the government announces a policy that involves increasing money supply beyond its expected growth level. Revisions would only be made after the increase in money supply has occurred, and even then agents would only react gradually. In each period that agents found their expectations of inflation to be wrong, a certain proportion of agents' forecasting error would be incorporated into their initial expectations. Therefore equilibrium in the economy would only be converged upon and never reached. The government would be able to maintain employment above its natural level and easily manipulate the economy.

This behaviour by agents is contrary to that which is assumed by much of economics. Economics has firm foundations in assumption of rationality, so the systematic errors made by agents in macroeconomic theory were considered unsatisfactory by Sargent and Wallace. When applying rational expectations within a macroeconomic framework, Sargent and Wallace produced the policy ineffectiveness proposition, according to which the government could not successfully intervene in the economy if attempting to manipulate output. If the government employed monetary expansion in order to increase output, agents would foresee the effects, and wage and price expectations would be revised upwards accordingly. Real wages and prices remain constant and therefore so does output, no money illusion occurs. Only stochastic shocks to the economy can cause deviations in employment from its natural level.

Taken at face value, the theory appeared to be a major blow to a substantial proportion of macroeconomics, particularly Keynesian economics. However, criticisms of the theory were quick to follow its publication.


The Sargent and Wallace model has been criticised by a wide range of economists. Some, like Milton Friedman, have questioned the validity of the rational expectations assumption. Sanford Grossman and Joseph Stiglitz argued that even if agents had the cognitive ability to form rational expectations, they would be unable to profit from the resultant information since their actions would then reveal their information to others. Therefore, agents would not expend the effort or money required to become informed and government policy would remain effective.

The New Keynesian economists Stanley Fischer (1977) and Edmund Phelps and John B. Taylor (1977) assumed that workers sign nominal wage contracts that last for more than one period, making wages "sticky". With this assumption the model shows government policy is fully effective since, although workers rationally expect the outcome of a change in policy, they are unable to respond to it as they are locked into expectations formed when they signed their wage contract. Not only is it possible for government policy to be used effectively, but its use is also desirable. The government is able respond to stochastic shocks in the economy which agents are unable to react to, and so stabilise output and employment.

The Barro-Gordon model showed how the ability of government to manipulate output would lead to inflationary bias. The government would be able to cheat agents and force unemployment below its natural level but would not wish to do so. The role of government would therefore be limited to output stabilisation.

Since it was possible to incorporate the rational expectations hypothesis into macroeconomic models whilst avoiding the stark conclusions that Sargent and Wallace reached, the policy ineffectiveness proposition has had less of a lasting impact on macroeconomic reality than first may have been expected. In fact, Sargent himself admitted that macroeconomic policy could have nontrivial effects, even under the rational expectations assumption, in the preface to the 1987 edition of his textbook "Dynamic Macroeconomic Theory"::'The first edition appeared at a time when discussions of the 'policy ineffectiveness proposition' occupied much of the attention of macroeconomists. As work of John B. Taylor has made clear, the methodological and computational implications of the hypothesis of rational expectations for the theory of optimal macroeconomic policy far transcend the question of whether we accept or reject particular models embodying particular neutrality propositions... The current edition contains many more examples of models in which a government faces a nontrivial policy choice than did the earlier edition.'

ee also

*Ricardian equivalence
*Neutrality of money
*Sticky wages and prices


*Barro, Robert J. 1977. Unanticipated Money Growth and Unemployment in the United States. "The American Economic Review" 67, no. 2 (March): 101-115
*Barro, Robert J. 1978. Unanticipated Money, Output, and the Price Level in the United States. The "Journal of Political Economy" 86, no. 4 (August): 549-580
*Fischer, Stanley. 1977. Long-Term Contracts, Rational Expectations, and the Optimal Money Supply Rule. "Journal of Political Economy" 85, no. 1 (February): 191-205.
*Glick, Reuven, and Michael Hutchison. 1990. New Results in Support of the Fiscal Policy Ineffectiveness Proposition. "Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking" 22, no. 3 (August): 288-304
*Grossman, Sanford J. and Stiglitz, Joseph, 1980. On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets. "American Economic Review" 70, no. 3: 393–408.
*Heijdra, Ben J. and van der Ploeg, F. 2002. Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics
*McCallum, Bennett T. 1979. The Current State of the Policy-Ineffectiveness Debate. "The American Economic Review" 69, no. 2 (May): 240-245
*Phelps, Edmund S. and John B. Taylor, 1977. Stabilizing Powers of Monetary Policy under Rational Expectations. "Journal of Political Economy" 85, no. 1 (February): 163-190.
*Sargent, Thomas, and Neil Wallace. 1975. 'Rational' Expectations, the Optimal Monetary Instrument, and the Optimal Money Supply Rule. "Journal of Political Economy" 83, no. 2 (April): 241-54
*Sargent, Thomas, and Neil Wallace. 1976. Rational Expectations and the Theory of Economic Policy. "Journal of Monetary Economics" 2, no. 2 (April): 169-183
*Sargent, Thomas. 1987. "Dynamic Macroeconomic Theory", 2nd ed. Academic Press: ISBN 0126197512

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Ricardian equivalence — Ricardian equivalence, (also known as the Barro Ricardo equivalence proposition) is an economic theory which suggests that it does not matter whether a government finances its spending with debt or tax increase, total level of demand in an… …   Wikipedia

  • Lucas critique — The Lucas Critique, named for Robert Lucas s work on macroeconomic policymaking, says that it is naive to try to predict the effects of a change in economic policy entirely on the basis of relationships observed in historical data, especially… …   Wikipedia

  • List of economics topics — This aims to be a complete list of the articles on economics. It does not include articles about economists, who are listed in the list of economists. NOTOC A * Accounting Accounting reform Actuary Adaptive expectations Adverse selection Agent… …   Wikipedia

  • Lucas-Islands model — The Lucas Islands model is an economic model formulated by Robert Lucas, Jr. Its purpose is to model the link between money supply and price and output changes in a simplified economy using rational expectations. The model contains a group of N… …   Wikipedia

  • Lucas aggregate supply function — The Lucas aggregate supply function or Lucas surprise supply function, based on the Lucas imperfect information model, is a representation of aggregate supply based on the work of new classical economist Robert Lucas. The model states that… …   Wikipedia

  • Rational expectations — is an assumption used in many contemporary macroeconomic models, and also in other areas of contemporary economics and game theory and in other applications of rational choice theory. Since most macroeconomic models today study decisions over… …   Wikipedia

  • Lucas, Robert E., Jr. — born Sept. 15, 1937, Yakima, Wash., U.S. U.S. economist. He studied at the University of Chicago and began teaching there in 1975. He questioned the influence of John Maynard Keynes in macroeconomics and the efficacy of government intervention in …   Universalium

  • Adaptive expectations — In economics, adaptive expectations means that people form their expectations about what will happen in the future based on what has happened in the past. For example, if inflation has been higher than expected in the past, people would revise… …   Wikipedia

  • Pip — may refer to:Noun and namePeople* Pip, any of the backup singers for Gladys Knight in the American R B group Gladys Knight the Pips, active from 1953 to 1989 * Pip, short for Philip Pirrip, the name given by Charles Dickens to the protagonist of… …   Wikipedia

  • Thomas J. Sargent — Infobox Economist school tradition = New classical macroeconomics color = #B0C4DE image caption = name = Thomas J. Sargent birth = birth date and age|1943|7|19 death = nationality = flag|United States field = Macroeconomics, monetary economics… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”