J. Richard Gott

John Richard Gott III (b. Louisville, Kentucky, 1947) is a professor of astrophysical sciences at Princeton University. He is especially well known for developing and advocating two cosmological theories with the flavor of science fiction: Time travel, and the Doomsday argument.

Exotic matter time travel theories

Paul Davies's bestseller "How to build a time machine" credits Gott with the proposal of using cosmic strings to create a time machine. Gott's machine depends upon the antigravitational tension of the (hypothetical) strings to deform space without attracting nearby objects. The traveler would follow a precise path around rapidly separating strings, and find that she had moved backwards in time.

Gott also proposed a "time mirror": a time travel device based on the principle of time delays. The device would be situated near a black hole some hundred or more light years from Earth. The device would act as a light collector and would power the light rays deformed and curved by the gravitational depression of the black hole. The collector would then reveal the past as detailed by the photons that had originated from Earth.

Since Gott believes that time travel is not cosmologically excluded, he has presented the possibility that the universe was created out of itself (at a later time). This controversial suggestion was published with Li-Xin Lin, and it was described by Gott as "it would be like having one branch of a tree circle around and grow up to be the trunk. In that way, the universe could be its own mother."

In his own book, "Time Travel in Einstein's Universe: The Physical Possibilities of Travel Through Time", Gott argues that travel to the past is quite possible, although probably only after the construction of a working device ("during" its existence), and certainly not onto the time traveler's own past timeline (he argues that either the many worlds QM interpretation must be invoked to overcome the Grandfather paradox, or that all time travel remain self-consistent, i.e., one can visit the past, but not change it). Although he is keen to emphasize that time travel itself is a commonplace physical phenomenon, by this he means time travel into the future at varying rates through special relativity, he is not completely committal on the subject of time travel to the past. The book does say that nothing known excludes such travel, but he doesn't completely rule out the possibility that future research may prove it impossible.

Copernicus method and Doomsday theory

Gott first thought of his "Copernicus method" of lifetime estimation in 1969 when stopping at the Berlin Wall and wondering how long it would stand. Instead of extrapolating a set of developments in world geo-politics (futurology), Gott used his relative ignorance to his advantage by saying that the Copernican principle is applicable in cases where nothing is known; unless there was something special about his visit (which he didn't think there was) this gave a 75% chance that he was seeing the wall "after" the first quarter of its life. Based on its age in 1969 (8 years), Gott left the wall with 75% confidence that it wouldn't be there in 1993 ((8/.25) + 1961).

In fact, the wall was brought down in 1989, and 1993 was the year in which Gott applied his "Copernicus method" to the lifetime of the human race. His paper in Nature was the first to apply the Copernican principle to the survival of humanity; His original prediction gave 95% confidence that the human race would last for between 5100 and 7.8 million years. (Brandon Carter's alternative form of the Doomsday argument was delivered earlier that year, but Gott's derivation was independent.)

He made a major effort subsequently to defend his form of the Doomsday argument from a variety of philosophical attacks, and this debate (like the feasibility of closed time loops) is still ongoing. To popularize the "Copernicus method", Gott gave "The New Yorker" magazine a 95% confidence interval for the closing time of forty-four Broadway and Off Broadway productions based only on their opening dates. He was more or less 95% correct.

Gott's education work

He received the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching in acknowledgment of his work on the "National Westinghouse and Intel Science Talent Search" high school student science competition. He is an active promoter of the public awareness of science at the popular level, and Princeton students have voted him the school's outstanding professor several times.

Gott is a Presbyterian who distinguishes physical from meta-physical questions by their teleology; he believes ( [http://www.science-spirit.org/article_detail.php?article_id=270] ) that his writings are entirely scientific (not trespassing into the theology) because the motivation for the way things are (or might be) is never examined.

ee also

* Kip Thorne's writings on wormhole time travel marked the introduction of the subject's serious discussion in physics.
* Science Fiction has "often sparked interesting science investigations" in Gott's view (for instance Kip Thorne's original time travel work was provoked by Carl Sagan). His favourite work is H.G. Wells' The Time Machine.
* Regular pseudopolyhedrons - Infinite periodic polyhedra in 3-space

References

* Gott, Richard, J III. "Implications of the Copernican principle for our future prospects" (1993, Nature vol 363, p315) This was Gott's original description of the Doomsday argument. He later published a popularized version in...
* Gott, Richard, J III. "A Grim Reckoning", 15 November 1997 New Scientist (page 36).
* Paul Davies, "How to build a time machine", 2002, Penguin popular science, ISBN 0-14-100534-3 gives a very brief non-mathematical description of Gott's alternative; the specific setup is not intended by Gott as the best-engineered approach to moving backwards in time, rather, it is a theoretical argument for a non-wormhole means of time travel.
* J Richard Gott, "Time Travel in Einstein's Universe: The Physical Possibilities of Travel Through Time", 2002, Houghton Mifflin Books, ISBN 0-618-25735-7
* J. R. Gott, "Pseudopolyhedrons", American Mathematical Monthly, Vol 74, p. 497-504, 1967.

External links

* [http://www.science-spirit.org/article_detail.php?article_id=270 "J. Richard Gott on Life, the Universe, and Everything"] an interview with science & spirit magazine which briefly covers Gott's personal views on the major controversies he has stirred up. He combines his two more controversial positions by saying that he would like to travel 200,000 years into the future to see whether his Doomsday argument prediction would pay off.
* [http://print.google.co.uk/print?id=MME33bSTCDsC&lpg=3&dq=J.+Richard+Gott&prev=http://www.google.co.uk/search%3Fsourceid%3Dnavclient%26ie%3DUTF-8%26rls%3DGGLC,GGLC:1970-01,GGLC:en%26q%3DJ.%2BRichard%2BGott&pg=5&sig=EO1W4HBiKjVfptRe_4n15inZZNM "Time Travel in Einstein's Universe" on Google Print]
* [http://www.sns.ias.edu/~dejan/CCS/work/news/Gott_interview/J.Richard.Gott.III.eng.html Q & A] with Dejan Vinkovic illustrated with a few pictures and a GIF animation of a self-creating universe, in which Gott advocates the importance of the average person having an education in science and especially physics.
* [http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg15621085.100 Abstract to Gott's "A grim reckoning" New Scientist article] - online content of the full article requires a paid registration.
* [http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~kagan/holography/AS138/Lectures/Gott-NewScientist.html A link to the entire New scientist article.]
* [http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001910/01/VAASTIME.PDF Gott & Li's 1998 self-creating universe model compared with other cosmological models of time] Rüdiger Vaas argues that Gott's self-creating universe is not rendered meaningless by Kant's first antinomy of pure reason.
* [http://nickgogerty.typepad.com/designing_better_futures/files/observation.xls] Excel spreadsheet for prection using Gott's approach
* [http://www.newyorker.com/archive/1999/07/12/1999_07_12_035_TNY_LIBRY_000018591?printable=true] New Yorker Magazine interview. 12-July-1999