- Phil Elmore
Infobox Writer
name = Phil Elmore
imagesize = 90
caption = Phil Elmore
pseudonym =
birthname =
birthdate =
birthplace =
deathdate =
deathplace =
occupation = Technical writer and freelance author
nationality =United States
ethnicity =Caucasian
citizenship =United States
education =
alma_mater =
period =
genre =
subject =Martial arts ,Self-defense
movement =
notableworks =
spouse =
partner =
children =
relatives =
influences =
influenced =
awards =
website = http://www.philelmore.com/
portaldisp =Phil Elmore is a technical writer, columnist, and freelance author based in the
United States . He writes a weekly technology column forWorldNetDaily . [ [http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=75512] ] One ofPaladin Press ' writers and a regular contributor to a number of online and print publications, Elmore is probably best known for his online magazine [http://www.themartialist.com The Martialist] . While he did not coin or define the termmartialism , he promotes it actively as what he characterizes as a "philosophy of dynamic, assertive living," adherents to which "possess and use" a "combative mindset" that constitutes "a mental outlook that accepts the reality of violence and leaves [the martialist] aware and prepared for it." [http://philelmore.com/download-beamartialist/] ] This interpretation of the term, which Elmore further admits has been characterized as an attitude of "total aggression", has yet to gain mainstream acceptance. As there is no universal standard whereby self-defense opinions themselves can be judged to have achieved similar acceptance, whether Phil Elmore's work should be accepted by the martial arts community at large remains a matter of heated debate at many discussion forums on the internet.Beliefs
Elmore has described himself publicly as an Objectivist and is an outspoken opponent of
pacifism . [ [http://www.philelmore.com/philosophy.htm] ] Elmore's opinions about self-protection and associated politics are controversial. For example, he has claimed thatMixed Martial Arts are not primarily self-defense training, [ [http://themartialist.com/0404/pointcounterpoint.htm] ] that those on the political left and those who supportgun control cannot truly practice martial arts in a self-defense context or legitimately be considered martial artists, [ [http://www.themartialist.com/pecom/guncontrol.htm] ] that criminal profiling does not violate civil rights, [ [http://philelmore.com/seriouscolumns/011.htm] ] and that the United States Army's FM 3-25.150 field manual is not appropriate as a hand-to-hand manual for combat troops. [ [http://www.themartialist.com/0604/criticalfm.htm] ]Martial arts experience
Thanks in part to controversy over his opinions, Elmore is a frequent topic of discussion at online martial arts forums and boards. As a martial arts personality, he has been criticized for lacking instructor-level ranking (a black belt or equivalent in any recognized martial art), military training, or law enforcement experience. How, his critics ask, can one presume to speak with authority on the martial arts and self-defense without these credentials? Elmore has responded publicly to this criticism by stating that he has never had nor claimed to have had such credentials. He and his adherents consider this documentation irrelevant to practical, pragmatic self-defense instruction. [http://www.themartialist.com/credentials.htm] ]
According to Elmore, he has attended a series of schools and studied under several different teachers (both traditional and nontraditional) in the course of what he describes as "a decade and a half in the martial arts". Elmore studies two recognized martial arts:
Liu Seong Gung Fu and Jun Fan/Jeet Kune Do . He has publicly claimed no rank in either.elf-defense instruction
Whether Phil Elmore should be recognized and classified as a self-defense instructor is unclear according to Elmore's own statements. He has said that he has no official credentials supporting status as an instructor, but speaks extensively online and in print on self-defense topics. His websites contain considerable martial arts and self-defense advice, commentary, editorial opinions, and what arguably constitutes instruction, but this is disclaimed as being for "entertainment purposes only". His book "Shorthand Empty Hand" is described as a "curriculum", which implies instruction, [ [http://shorthandemptyhand.com/programs.htm] ] but the book is similarly disclaimed. Elmore is recognized by no known martial governing organization, but the membership of and partcipation at his e-zine's online discussion forum implies a following of some kind.
Published work
Elmore's original printed work includes self-published fiction and non-fiction as well as material published by
Paladin Press :
* "Demon Lord" (ISBN 1-59113-338-6)
* "Shorthand Empty Hand" (ISBN 1-59113-721-7)
* "Warriors: On Living with Courage, Discipline, and Honor" (ISBN 1-58160-454-8)
* "Flashlight Fighting" (ISBN 1-58160-502-1)
* "Mechanical War" (ISBN 1-59113-944-9)
* "Street Sword: Practical Use of the Long Blade" (ISBN 1-58160-598-6)Periodical contributions
Elmore's published work in online and print periodicals includes, the following publications:
* "Concealed Carry Magazine"
* "The Journal of Modern Combatives"
* "The Electronic Journal of Martial Arts and Sciences"
* "Filipino Martial Arts Digest"References
External links
* [http://www.philelmore.com Phil Elmore's "Authoring Services" Website]
** [http://www.paxbaculum.com Elmore's forum]
* [http://www.myspace.com/phil_elmore Phil Elmore's Myspace Page]
* [http://www.themartialist.com The Martialist: The Magazine for Those Who Fight Unfairly]
* [http://www.shorthandemptyhand.com Shorthand Empty Hand, a site devoted to Elmore's Self-Defense System]
* [http://www.bullshido.net/modules.php?name=FAQ&myfaq=yes&id_cat=5 Bullshido's critical FAQ on Phil Elmore and his Discussion Forum]
** [http://www.themartialist.com/bullshidofaq.htm Phil Elmore's Response to Bullshido's FAQ]
* [http://www.paladin-press.com Paladin Press]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.