- Line Item Veto Act of 1996
The Line Item Veto Act of 1996 enacted a
line-item veto for theFederal Government of the United States , but its effect was brief due tojudicial review .Public Law (P.L.) 104-130 [ [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d104:SN00004: Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress) ] ] was introduced by Senator Bob Dole on 4 January 1995, cosponsored by Senator John McCain and 28 other senators. Related House Bills included USBill|104|H.R.|147, USBill|104|H.R.|391, USBill|104|H.R.|2,USBill|104|H.R.|27 and USBill|104|H.R.|3136. The bill was signed into law by President
Bill Clinton onApril 9 ,1996 and was immediately challenged in theUnited States District Court for the District of Columbia by a group of six senators, first among whom wasSenator Robert Byrd (D-WV), where it was declared unconstitutional by District Judge Harry Jackson, a Reagan appointee, onApril 10 ,1997 . The case was subsequently remanded by theSupreme Court of the United States with instructions to dismiss on the grounds that the senators had not suffered sufficient, particularized injury to maintain suit under Article III of theUnited States Constitution (i.e., the senators lacked standing). The case, "Raines v. Byrd ," ussc|521|811|1997, was handed down onJune 26 ,1997 , and did not include a judgement on the constitutional grounds of the law.It was used against one provision of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 and two provisions of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 before being challenged again in two separate cases; one by the City of New York, two hospital associations, one hospital, and two health care unions; the other by a farmers' cooperative from
Idaho and an individual member of the cooperative. Senators Byrd, Moynihan, Levin, and Hatfield again opposed the law, this time throughAmicus curiæ briefs.Judge
Thomas Hogan of theUnited States District Court for the District of Columbia combined the cases and declared the law unconstitutional onFebruary 12 ,1998 . This ruling was subsequently affirmed onJune 25 ,1998 by a 6-3 decision of theSupreme Court of the United States in the case "Clinton v. City of New York ". Justices Breyer, Scalia, and O'Connor dissented.References
External links
* [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d104:SN00004: Legislative Information from the Library of Congress]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.