Semimodular lattice

This article is about generalizations of modularity in terms of the atomic covering relation. For M-symmetry, the generalization of modularity in terms of modular pairs, see modular lattice.

The centred hexagon lattice S₇, also known as D₂, is semimodular but not modular.

In the branch of mathematics known as order theory, a semimodular lattice, is a lattice that satisfies the following condition:

Semimodular law

a ∧ b  <:  a   implies   b  <:  a ∨ b.

The notation a <: b means that b covers a, i.e. a < b and there is no element c such that a < c < b.

An atomistic (hence algebraic) semimodular bounded lattice is called a matroid lattice because such lattices are equivalent to (simple) matroids. An atomistic semimodular bounded lattice of finite length is called a geometric lattice and corresponds to a matroid of finite rank.^[1]

Semimodular lattices are also known as upper semimodular lattices; the dual notion is that of a lower semimodular lattice. A finite lattice is modular if and only if it is both upper and lower semimodular.

A finite lattice, or more generally a lattice satisfying the ascending chain condition or the descending chain condition, is semimodular if and only if it is M-symmetric. Some authors refer to M-symmetric lattices as semimodular lattices.^[2]

Birkhoff's condition

A lattice is sometimes called weakly semimodular if it satisfies the following condition due to Garrett Birkhoff:

Birkhoff's condition

If   a ∧ b  <:  a  and  a ∧ b  <:  b,

then   a  <:  a ∨ b  and  b  <:  a ∨ b.

Every semimodular lattice is weakly semimodular. The converse is true for lattices of finite length, and more generally for upper continuous relatively atomic lattices.

Mac Lane's condition

The following two conditions are equivalent to each other for all lattices. They were found by Saunders Mac Lane, who was looking for a condition that is equivalent to semimodularity for finite lattices, but does not involve the covering relation.

Mac Lane's condition 1

For any a, b, c such that b ∧ c < a < c < b ∨ a,

there is an element d such that b ∧ c < d ≤ b and a = (a ∨ d) ∧ c.

Mac Lane's condition 2

For any a, b, c such that b ∧ c < a < c < b ∨ c,

there is an element d such that b ∧ c < d ≤ b and a = (a ∨ d) ∧ c.

Every lattice satisfying Mac Lane's condition is semimodular. The converse is true for lattices of finite length, and more generally for relatively atomic lattices. Moreover, every upper continuous lattice satisfying Mac Lane's condition is M-symmetric.

Notes

1. ^ These definitions follow Stern (1999). Some authors use the term geometric lattice for the more general matroid lattices. But most authors only deal with the finite case, in which both definitions are equivalent to semimodular and atomistic.
2. ^ For instance Fofanova (2001).

References

• Fofanova, T. S. (2001), "Semi-modular lattice", in Hazewinkel, Michiel, Encyclopaedia of Mathematics, Springer, ISBN 978-1556080104, http://eom.springer.de/s/s084240.htm . (The article is about M-symmetric lattices.)
• Stern, Manfred (1999), Semimodular lattices, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-46105-4 .

External links

• Geometric lattice on PlanetMath. (The article is about matroid lattices.)
• Semimodular lattice on PlanetMath.

See also

• Antimatroid