- Friedrich Schlichtegroll
Adolf Heinrich Friedrich Schlichtegroll (
8 December 1765 –4 December 1822 ) was the first biographer ofWolfgang Amadeus Mozart . His brief account of Mozart's life (6000 words) was published in a volume of twelve obituaries Schlichtegroll prepared and called "Nekrolog auf das Jahr 1791" ("Necrology for the year 1791"). The book appeared in 1793, two years after Mozart's death.ources
Schlictegroll had never met Mozart. To obtain information about him, he consulted a friend of Mozart's in
Salzburg ,Albert von Mölk , who in turn queried Mozart's sisterMaria Anna Mozart ("Nannerl"). [Eisen and Keefe, 337] Nannerl's written reply to his queries survives. [Printed in Deutsch (1965); see under "1792] Nannerl also contactedAndre Schachtner , an old Mozart family friend from the time of Wolfgang's childhood, and he replied with a kindly letter filled with anecdotes and memories, which Nannerl duly forwarded; Schachtner's remarks also survived and can be read today. [Printed in Deutsch (1965); see under "1792]Since none of these people was very close to Mozart after 1781 (the year he left Salzburg for
Vienna ), Schlichtegroll's biography is weighted toward the earlier period (i.e. first 25 years) of Mozart's life. [Eisen and Keefe, 337]Rival biographic traditions
Schlichtegroll's biography competed with another early work by Franz Niemetschek, which relied on the testimony of Mozart's widow Constanze. The Schlichtegroll biography is relatively harsh on the role Constanze played in Mozart's life, as might be expected given Nannerl's antipathy to Constanze; for details see
Maria Anna Mozart . According to the "Grove Dictionary of Music", "Constanze bought up and destroyed the entire edition of the "Nekrolog" (the publication containing Schlichtegroll's obituary), apparently disliking its portrayal of her." [Grove, article "Mozart", section 11]Assessment
Some modern scholars take a dim view of Schlichtegroll's work. Eisen and Keefe vividly depict him as the first in a long and dubious tradition:
:"the tradition of depicting Mozart as a strange mixture of angel and beast, Tamino and Papageno: sublime where his music was concerned, but pathetically inadequate in worldly matters. [Eisen and Keefe, 192]
Bruce Cooper Clarke, who has compiled an extensive web-posted commentary (link below) on Schlichtegroll's work, assesses him thus:
:"The debt posterity owes to Friedrich Schlichtegroll is mixed. On the one hand, because he asked questions not long after Mozart had died and offered the prospect of publication, Mozart's sister and others who were acquainted with the composer were led to put something of their remembrances in writing, reminiscences that otherwise might never have been recorded. On the other hand, through his handling of these materials, Schlichtegroll gave a powerful start to the formation of an "eternal-child" myth that, despite its irrelevance and wrongheadedness, has intruded ever since on every effort of Mozart biography to see its subject whole."
Notes
References
*Deutsch, Otto Erich (1965) "Mozart: A Documentary Biography". Stanford: Stanford University Press. Quotes only a brief section of the "Nekrolog" obituary, but includes all of Nannerl's report to Schlichtegroll.
*Eisen, Cliff and Simon P. Keefe (20xx) "The Cambridge Mozart Encyclopedia". Cambridge University Press. ISBN-13: 9780521856591.
*"Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians", online edition. Copyright 2007 by Oxford University Press.
*Schlichtegroll, Friedrich (1793) 'Johannes Chrysostomus Wolfgang Gottlieb Mozart', in "Nekrolog auf das Jahr 1791" ("Necrology for the year 1791") (Gotha , 1793), ed. L. Landshoff (Munich, 1924); published as "Mozarts Leben" ("Mozart's Life") (Graz, 1974)
*Solomon, Maynard (1995) "Mozart: A Life". Harper Collins.External links
*PND|117327077
* [http://aronsson.se/adb/31/484 Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie] (v. 31, p. 484 – 487; in German)
*Bruce Cooper Clarke, "The annotated Schlictegroll". Complete German text with extensive English annotations and commentary. http://www.mozartforum.com/Lore/article.php?id=113&pt_sid=34a4e2c6448ffe9fe150a58bd26a6f65
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.