- Unparticle
Unparticle physics is a speculative theory that conjectures
matter that cannot be explained in terms of particles, because its components are scale invariant.Howard Georgi proposed this theory in the spring of 2007 in the papers "Unparticle Physics" and "Another Odd Thing About Unparticle Physics". His papers were followed by a steady flow of further investigations by many other researchers into the properties and phenomenology of unparticle physics and its potential impact onparticle physics ,astrophysics ,cosmology ,CP violation ,lepton flavor violation,muon decay ,neutrino oscillation , andsupersymmetry .Background
All
particles exist in a state with a certainenergy ,momentum andmass . In most of theStandard Model of particle physics, particles of the same type cannot exist in another state with all these properties scaled up or down by a common factor –electrons , for example, always have the same mass regardless of their energy or momentum. But this is not always the case: massless particles, such asphotons , can exist with their properties scaled equally. This immunity to scaling is called "scale invariance".The idea of unparticles comes from conjecturing that there may be "stuff" that does not necessarily have zero mass but is still scale-invariant, with the same physics regardless of a change of length (or equivalently energy). This stuff is unlike particles, and described as unparticle.
Such unparticle stuff has not been observed, which suggests that if it exists, it must couple with normal matter weakly at observable energies. Since the
Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will begin probing a higher energy frontier in 2008, some theoretical physicists have begun to consider the properties of unparticle stuff and how it may appear in LHC experiments. One of the great hopes for the LHC is that it might come up with some discoveries that will help us update or replace our best description of the particles that make up matter and the forces that glue them together.Properties
Unparticles would have properties in common with
neutrinos , which have almost zero mass and are therefore nearlyscale invariant . Neutrinos barely interact with matter – most of the time physicists can only infer their presence by calculating the "missing" energy and momentum after an interaction. By looking at the same interaction many times, aprobability distribution is built up that tells more specifically how many and what sort of neutrinos are involved. They couple very weakly to ordinary matter at low energies, and the effect of the coupling increases as the energy increases.A similar technique could be used to search for evidence of unparticles. According to scale invariance, a distribution containing unparticles would become apparent because it would resemble a distribution for a fractional number of massless particles.
This scale invariant sector would interact very weakly with the rest of the Standard Model, making it possible to observe evidence for unparticle stuff, if it exists. The unparticle theory is a high-energy theory that contains both Standard Model fields and
Banks-Zaks fields , which have scale-invariant behavior at an infrared point. The two fields can interact through the interactions of ordinary particles if the energy of the interaction is sufficiently high.These particle interactions would appear to have "missing" energy and momentum that would not be detected by the experimental apparatus. Certain distinct distributions of missing energy would signify the production of unparticle stuff. If such signatures are not observed, bounds on the model can be set and refined.
This idea of unparticles was previously considered by F. Smarandache in 2004, 2005 and 2006 when he uploaded a paper on CERN web site and published three papers about what he called 'unmatter', which is a new bound form of matter and antimatter, and in 2006 by E. Goldfain who formulated the concept of 'fractional number of field quanta'. Goldfain conjectured that these nontrivial states of matter emerge in the near or deep TeV sector of particle physics, as a result of non-equilibrium dynamics and complex behavior.
References
*
*
* F. Smarandache, Matter, Antimatter, and Unmatter, CERN web site, EXT-2005-142, http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/798551, 2004.
* F. Smarandache, “Verifying Unmatter by Experiments, More Types of Unmatter, and A Quantum Chromodynamics Formula”, Progress in Physics, Vol. 2, 113-116, 2005; (an improved version in “Infinite Energy”, Concord, NH, USA, 36-39, vol. 12, Issue 67, 2006).
* E. Goldfain, "Complexity in Quantum Field Theory and physics beyond the Standard Model", Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 2006, v. 28, 913. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2005.09.012)
* E. Goldfain, "A Brief Note on 'Un-Particle' Physics", Progress in Physics, 2008, v. 3, L1 (http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2008/PP-14-15.PDF)
* [http://xstructure.inr.ac.ru/x-bin/theme3.py?level=1&index1=446043 Unparticle physics on arxiv.org]
* E. Goldfain and F. Smarandache, "On Emergent Physics, 'Unparticles' and Exotic 'Unmatter' States", Progress in Physics, 2008, v.4, 10-15 (http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2008/PP-15-02.PDF)
* E. Goldfain, "Fractional dynamics and collider phenomenology", in press, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.07.017)External links
*
*
*
*
*
*
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.