- Astraptes fulgerator
Taxobox
name = Two-barred Flasher
regnum =Animal ia
phylum =Arthropod a
classis =Insect a
ordo =Lepidoptera
unranked_familia =Rhopalocera
superfamilia =Hesperioidea
familia =Hesperiidae
subfamilia =Pyrginae
genus = "Astraptes "
species = "A. fulgerator"
binomial = "Astraptes fulgerator"
binomial_authority =The Two-barred Flasher ("Astraptes fulgerator"), is a
cryptic species complex in the spread-wing skipperbutterfly genus "Astraptes ". It ranges all over theAmericas , from the southernUSA to northernArgentina .Description
"A. fulgerator"'s adults all look quite alike. They are mid-sized skipper butterflies with the typical wing shape of this group. The upperside is black, with basal to postbasal blue corners which are more extensive on the forewings. There is one discal-tomal and one apical band on the forewing; these are usually off-white to light blue but the former may be quite white towards the costal margin. The
thorax has bluish hair on the back, the underside is yellow to orange.Herbert "et al." (2004)]The
caterpillar s andpupae show a wide range of colors and patterns, and the caterpillars also vary in food preference. Last-instar caterpillars are black with a pattern consisting of light to bright yellow dots along the sides, or rings of varying thickness, sometimes interrupted on the back, in a range of colors varying from white to orange-red.Herbert "et al." (2004)]Larval foodplants
This species is highly polyphagous, with most foodplants belonging to the
Fabaceae (legume family):Selected primary foodplants
Area de Conservación Guanacaste World Heritage Site , NWCosta Rica : Hébert "et al." (2004)]
*Fabaceae
** "Inga ": "I. exalata", "I. oerstediana", "I. punctata", "I. sapindoides", "I. vera" and probably others
** "Lonchocarpus " (see also below)
** "Senna":Candle Bush ("S. alata"), "S. cobanensis", "S. hayesiana", "S. pallida", "S. papillosa", "S. undulata" and probably others [Hébert "et al." (2004) refer to "Cassia emarginata", which today is either of "Chamaecrista pilosa ",Rambling Senna ("S. bicapsularis") or "Senna candolleana ". The last does not occur in their study area; given the general importance of "Senna" species and the lack of records for "Chamaecrista" species as foodplants in the study area, "S. bicapsularis" seems to be the plant in question.]
*Malvaceae
** "Hampea appendiculata " (but see below)
*Sapindaceae
** "Cupania ": "C. glabra", "C. guatemalensis" and probably othersSelected secondary and accidental foodplants
*Capparaceae
** "Capparis frondosa "
*Fabaceae
** "Canavalia brasiliensis "
** "Cassia":Golden Shower Tree ("C. fistula"), "C. grandis" and possibly others
** "Centrosema" (butterfly pea s): "C. macrocarpum", "C. plumieri" and possibly others
** "Desmodium glabrum "
** "Dioclea ": "D. malacocarpa", "D. violacea" and possibly others
** "Mucuna holtonii "
** "Piscidia carthagenensis "
*Malvaceae
** "Byttneria catalpaefolia "
*Rhamnaceae
** "Karwinskia calderoni "
*Salicaceae
** "Casearia sylvestris "
*Styracaceae
** "Styrax argenteus "ystematics
Due to the diversity of caterpillar colors and food plants it was long suspected that the butterflies referred to as "Astraptes fulgerator" might be more than a single species. COI
DNA sequence data indicates that a number of populations are in various stages ofreproductive isolation , and the taxonomy of these butterflies will probably be revised accordingly. Initial results seem to confirm that in one study area, at least 3 species or previously unrecognized subspecies are involved. Given the species complex' large range, considerable more emergent species and subspecies seem to await discovery. [Hébert "et al." (2004), Brower "et al." (2006)]DNA barcoding controversy
This butterfly has been subject of a pioneering DNA barcoding study of a 648 bp sequence from COI, purportedly showing
"that "A. fulgerator" is a complex of at least 10 species in
A later reanalysis of the DNA sequence data using[ Area de Conservación Guanacaste World Heritage Site , NWCosta Rica ] ."Neighbor-Joining bootstrap, population aggregation analysis andcladistic haplotype analysisBrower (2006)] found that" [a] t least three, but not more than seven mtDNA clades that may correspond to cryptic species are supported by the evidence."
Also,"... sequences that [did] not fit the general host plant pattern were simply dismissed with an ad hoc and manifestly incorrect explanation"
by Hébert and his coworkers. The improper use of taxonomic vocabulary was also criticized; Hébert "et al." apply the terms "species " and "taxa " as if they were synonymous, but nowhere validly describe their proposed "species".Cryptic variation
While the exact number of taxa involved is disputed, most of the "species" detected by the
DNA barcoding study seem to be nothing more than morphs or incipientsubspecies , coupled with a serious undererstimation of variation. Still, two lineages appear to be well distinct and separable at least assubspecies :"CELT" has larvae with bold orange bands in the last instar, which were recorded only on "
Celtis iguanaea " (Cannabaceae ). "TRIGO" last-instar larvae have bold yellow bands and were found on theMalpighiales "Trigonia " ("T. arborea", "T. laevia" and "T. rugosa") and, apparently accidentally, on "Licania arborea ".Three more lineages are in need of further study. One ("NUMT") was initially dismissed as a
numt pseudogene combined with sequencing error but may represent a hitherto unrecognized taxon. Two other lineages ("LOHAM" and "LONCHO") were considered highly distinct in the barcoding study but the reanalysis showed that this might just as well be in error. The latter two are peculiar in some aspects, such as apparently never having bands or orange colors in the last instar stage and showing a preference for "Lonchocarpus costaricensis ", "Lonchocarpus oliganthus ", and "Hampea appendiculata " as larval food but are not monophagous. They appear to be an intermediate stage inlineage sorting and might be considered one or two subspecies if the two most distinct lineages are split off as species.The other lineages show a marked lack of agreement between morphological, ecological and genetical variation in the reanalysis of the supposed clusters. The entire range of caterpillar colors and patterns is found across one huge ill-structured cluster of genetic diversity. They are polyphagous, feeding preferentially on "
Inga " and "Senna " as well as a variety of other plants, but apparently not on those preferred by the more distinct lineages except "Hampea appendiculata ".The proposed divergence times for the lineages are derived from a standard
molecular clock model, which is today known to be incorrect.Footnotes
References
* (2006): Problems with DNA barcodes for species delimitation: 'ten species' of "Astraptes fulgerator" reassessed (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). "Systematics and Biodiversity" 4(2): 127–132. doi|10.1017/S147720000500191X [http://www.bolinfonet.org/pdf/Brower_2006SYSTBIODIVERSITY%5B1%5D.pdf PDF fulltext]
* (2004): Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the semitropical skipper butterfly "Astraptes fulgerator". "PNAS " 101(41): 14812-14817. doi|10.1073/pnas.0406166101 [http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/101/41/14812.pdf PDF fulltext] [http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0406166101/DC1 Supporting Appendices]External links
* [http://www.barcodinglife.com/views/imagecomparison.php?& Gallery of specimens] as per Hébert "et al." (2004). Retrieved 2007-DEC-17.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.