- Bybee memo
The Bybee Memo was a document prepared by the
United States Department of Justice 'sOffice of Legal Counsel (OLC), and specificallyJohn Yoo , in response to aCIA request to theWhite House . [ [http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A26431-2004Jul3?language=printer Slim Legal Grounds for Torture Memos] . R. Jeffrey Smith,Washington Post , July 4, 2004.] It was submitted on 1August 2002 . The memo takes its name from the then head of the OLC,Jay Bybee .The memo describes the limitations on the behavior of
US government interrogator s outside theUnited States as governed by theUnited Nations Convention Against Torture . The Convention's provisions are implemented in the United States by 18 USC 2340. After surveying the history of 18 USC 2340, the Convention itself, court decisions regarding theTorture Victims Protection Act (28 USC 1350), and the Commander-in-Chief powers of the President, the memo concluded thattorture was defined as "acts inflicting...severepain orsuffering , whether mental or physical." Physical pain "must be equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying seriousphysical injury , such asorgan failure , impairment of bodily function, or evendeath ."Mental pain "must result in significant psychological harm of significant duration, e.g., lasting for months or even years," as well as be the result of one of the specific causes of mental pain contained 18 USC 2340, "namely: threats of imminent death; threats of infliction of the kind of pain that would amount tophysical torture ; infliction of such physical pain as a means ofpsychological torture ; use ofdrug s or other procedures designed to deeply disrupt the senses, or fundamentally alter an individual's personality; or threatening to do any of these things to a third party."The memo also concluded that even though an act is "cruel, inhuman, or degrading," it doesn't necessarily inflict the level of pain that 18 USC 2340 prohibits, and thus does not subject an interrogator to criminal prosecution. Additionally, it stated that a defense of "necessity or
self-defense may justify interrogation methods" that violate 18 USC 2340.Although the memo was later declared inoperative by the
George W. Bush administration , the superseding OLC opinion of 30December 2004 noted that " [w] hile we have identified various disagreements with theAugust 2002 Memorandum , we have reviewed this Office's prior opinions addressing issues involving treatment of detainees and do not believe that any of their conclusions would be different under the standards set forth in this memorandum."References
ee also
*
Blue sky memo
*Bush-Blair memo
*Downing Street memo
*Waterboarding External links
* [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/torture/themes/redefining.html A PBS article] about the memo.
* [http://justice.gov/olc/index.html Office of Legal Counsel]
* [http://assembler.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002340---A000-.html US Code]
* [http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/us_law/etn/gonzales/memos_dir/memo_20020801_JD_%20Gonz_.pdf#search=%22bybee%20memo%20pdf%22 Full text of Bybee memo] (2,671K pdf) from Findlaw
* [http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/18usc23402340a2.htm December 30, 2004 OLC memo]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.