- Usumacinta River
Infobox River
river_name = Usumacinta River (Río Usumacinta)
caption = Usumacinta River, view fromChiapas . The far bank isGuatemala
origin =Guatemala coord|15.270358|-91.413717|type:landmark_region:GT|display=inline,title|name=Sources Usumacinta River
mouth =Gulf of Mexico
basin_countries =Guatemala ,Mexico
length = 1,000 km (600 miles)
elevation =
mouth_elevation = 0 m (Gulf of Mexico ) coord|18.649498|-92.467890|type:landmark_region:GT|display=inline|name=Río Usumacinta
discharge =
watershed =The Usumacinta River is a
river in southeasternMexico and northwesternGuatemala . It is formed by the junction of thePasión River , which arises in theSierra de Santa Cruz (in Guatemala) and the Salinas River, also known as the Chixoy, or the Negro, which descends from the Sierra Madre de Guatemala. It defines part of the border between theMexican state ofChiapas and Guatemala, then continues its northwesterly course, meandering through the Mexican state ofTabasco to theGulf of Mexico . The total length of the river, including the Salinas, Chixoy, Negro rivers in Guatemala is approximately 1,000 km (600 miles). [cite web | url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/620466/Usumacinta-River | publisher= | title=Usumacinta River | author=Encyclopædia Britannica | access=2008 | format=] [cite web | url=http://www.conagua.gob.mx/CONAGUA07/Noticias/DR_0701.pdf | publisher= | title=Disponibilidad de aguas subterráneas en el acuífero Palenque, Estado de Chiapas |author=CONAGUA |year=2003 | page=9 |access=2008 | format=PDF] It is the only visible natural boundary separating theYucatán Peninsula from Mexico.History
The river and its tributaries were important trade routes for the ancient
Maya civilization .Yaxchilan and Piedras Negras, two of the most powerful cities of theMaya Classic Period , lie along its banks.Before roads penetrated the jungle, such as the Border Highway constructed by the Mexican Government in the early 1990s, the river was the only means of travel in this region. Huge trunks of
hardwood trees were floated downriver to the state ofTabasco .In the 1980s, many Guatemalan
refugee s fled across the river to relative safety in Mexico. Other groups of refugees and Guatemalan guerrillas formed the so-called CPR communities in the jungle on the Guatemalan shores, hiding from the government until the peace accords of the nineties.Frans and Trudi Blom first brought the idea of conservation to the watershed in the 1950s by proposing that a section of the Selva Lacandona be reserved for the
Lacandon Maya. Their idea was as much the preservation of culture as of habitat, and this principle – that indigenous integrity and habitat are inextricably linked in the watershed – should help guide any future conservation planning. Conservationists working in the region, such as Nacho March, Ron Nigh, Fernando Ochoa, Roan Balas McNab and others, have all acknowledged and upheld the principle in their work.The first large
hydroelectric project on the Usumacinta was proposed in the 1980s, and would have stretched all the way up the Pasion and Lacantun tributaries, flooding Piedras Negras andYaxchilan , among other known and unknown Maya sites. At that time, the Guatemalan shore was held by rebels, whose presence discouraged illegal logging, poaching, and looting. It also discouraged dam engineers. In 1985 Jefferey Wilkerson's groundbreaking article inNational Geographic brought the river and its glories to widespread public consciousness for the first time. Additionally, the Guatemalan journalistVictor Perera wrote about the river in "The Nation" and in his books, "The Last Lords of Palenque" and "Unfinished Conquest", and Jan de Vos chronicled the region in his magisterial series of histories. Ultimately the hydro project failed under the weight of its own disincentives: siltation, geology, seismic activity, distance from markets, politics, etc., but the outcry from conservationists, archeologists, writers, and the public helped. It also established a pattern.A thriving seasonal business in wilderness tourism began after the Wilkerson article. The river and its environs became a favorite destination of river travelers, amateur Mayanists and archaeologists, birders and wildlife tourists.
Carlos Salinas proposed a smaller but still monumental hydro project in 1990, and completed the periferico surrounding the Montes Azules reserve. Articles in the "New York Times," and op-ed pieces byHomero Aridjis suggesting a binational reserve for the area, helped defeat this incarnation of the idea.In the late nineties a consortium of scientists, and government and non-governmental organizations met in
San Cristóbal de las Casas , under the auspices of theWildlife Conservation Society and theUniversity of Florida , to identify the extent and types of habitat remaining the region, and to draw maps of the watershed. The conference addressed many of the jurisdictional and administrative questions that still bedevil the idea.The
Zapatista Rebellion in1994 and1995 , and the Guatemalan peace accords in 1996, reshaped the political lines in the watershed. As a direct consequence, and with the dramatic fall of the peso, bandits began robbing raft trips, ending wilderness travel in the corridor. One of the most promising tourist activities, with the least potential impact and the most possibility for helping conservation, archaeology, and cultural preservation, ended. Illegal activity of all types took over the corridor.The Mexican army, which pervaded the Zapatista region, had little effect on river crime, and may have abetted it. In Guatemala, the absence of the expelled CPR communities, which had helped keep the selva safe and secure, now left it open to invasion, illegal logging, smuggling of immigrants, arms, artifacts, and drugs. (Many members of those communities now work as Defensores, but their numbers are few, and they are poorly paid.) The region continued in a state of low-grade terror and occupation for ten years.
Notes
References
: cite journal |author=aut|Canter, Ronald L. |year=2007 |title=Rivers Among the Ruins: The Usumacinta |url=http://www.mesoweb.com/pari/publications/journal/703/Usumacinta.html |format=
PDF online reproduction | journal=The PARI Journal |publisher=Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute |location=San Francisco, CA |volume=VII |issue=3 |issn=1531-5398 |oclc=44780248 |accessdate=2007-11-21: cite journal |author=aut|Golden, Charles |coauthors=and aut|Andrew Scherer |year=2006 |title=Border Problems: Recent Archaeological Research along the Usumacinta River |url=http://www.mesoweb.com/pari/publications/journal/702/border_problems.html |format=PDF online reproduction | journal=The PARI Journal |publisher=Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute |location=San Francisco, CA |volume=VII |issue=2 |issn=1531-5398 |oclc=44780248 |accessdate=2008-02-01External links
* [http://www.law.ufl.edu/cgr/publications/usumacinta_river.pdf THE USUMACINTA RIVER: Building a Framework for Cooperation between Mexico and Guatemala]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.