- Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin
The Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin is a diocese that came into being after separating from the Episcopal Church in 2007. It currently claims to be a diocese of the
Anglican Province of the Southern Cone , but this status is disputed.The diocese is headquartered in Fresno,California . The coterminousEpiscopal Diocese of San Joaquin , which did not separate from the Episcopal Church, is headquartered in Stockton,California , and was, until the events surrounding the creation of the Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin, one of the most conservative within the Episcopal ChurchFact|date=April 2008 and one of three that did not ordain women (the others being the dioceses of Quincy and Fort Worth).The pre-separation Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin had a membership of approximately 8,500. [http://www.episcopalchurch.org/79901_92524_ENG_HTM.htm]On
8 December 2007 , at the annual convention of the Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin, delegates voted to disaffiliate from the Episcopal Church and to align with theAnglican Province of the Southern Cone . The diocese claims to remain, through the Southern Cone, within theAnglican Communion headed by theArchbishop of Canterbury . Whether the diocese had the power to take that action is controversial. Those who believe it did not have this power say that the constitution and canons of The Episcopal Church do not permit dioceses to disaffiliate, that there is no provision for a diocese to relate to the Anglican Communion through an overseas province, and that the constitution and canons of the province of the Southern Cone do not permit it to have dioceses outside certain countries in South America. [ [http://www.fwepiscopal.org/downloads/PSCconstitution&canons.pdf Microsoft Word - C & C Southern Cone.doc ] ] Those who believe it did have this power say that the diocese is the basic unit of the Anglican Communion and has the inherent power to leave a province, and that the Southern Cone claims it as a diocese under its protection in an extraordinary time of division. Any permanent change would require a change in the Southern Cone's constitution as well as the consent of theAnglican Consultative Council . Neither Schofield nor the province of the Southern Cone have addressed the legality of this violation of the constitution of the Province of the Southern Cone.The diocesan
bishop ,John David Schofield , was consecrated9 October 1988 and became the diocesan on15 December 1988 .Dispute
The Episcopal Church disputes the ability of a diocese to transfer from one province to another without the consent of its original province. As a result it considers those who have allied themselves with the province of the Southern Cone to have left the Episcopal Church and has taken steps to preserve a continuing
Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin . Schofield and many of the former leaders of the Episcopal diocese disagree. Schofield has spoken as if there is a single diocese of San Joaquin, no longer a part of the Episcopal Church, of which he is the bishop and has not recognized the legitimacy of the Episcopal Church's claim of ongoing jurisdiction over this area.On Friday,
11 January 2008 , the Episcopal Church's Presiding Bishop,Katharine Jefferts Schori , declared Bishop Schofield inhibited from exercising episcopal authority within the diocese and, onMarch 12 2008 , he was deposed as the bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin by action of theHouse of Bishops of the Episcopal Church. [ [http://www.diosanjoaquin.org/dfc/newsdetail_2/11 The Episcopal Church in Central California | The Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin ] ] The inhibition was disputed by Bishop Schofield who argued that Schori's authority does not extend to his diocese which, he says, forms part of the Anglican Communion but not of the Episcopal Church. [ [http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=7478 VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - Southern Cone Archbishop Says San Joaquin Bishop is Under His Authority ] ] On1 March 2008 , Schofield had tendered his resignation from theHouse of Bishops of the Episcopal Church while claiming to possess continuing authority as the bishop of the Diocese of San Joaquin. [http://www.episcopalcafe.com/lead/3-1-08_letter_to_Schori_and_HOB.pdf]On
15 March 2008 , the Bishop of Central Florida, John W. Howe, requested that the Episcopal Church’s three senior bishops review the case, saying he was under “no illusions that the outcome of the despicable vote to depose John-David [Schofield] and William [Cox] will be reversed, but at least we might want to obey the canons.” [ [http://sanjoaquinsoundings.blogspot.com/2008/03/call-for-review-after-trial-flouted.html Soundings: Call for review after trial ‘flouted Church rules’ ] ]On
27 March 2008 , theEpiscopal Diocese of South Carolina officially protested the vote to depose Schofield and called for the Presiding Bishop, Katharine Jefferts Schori, to abstain from appointing a bishop to the Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin until the matter regarding the legality of the deposition could be addressed by the House of Bishops. [ [http://www.kendallharmon.net/t19/index.php/t19/article/11299/ TitusOneNine - Diocese of South Carolina Protests Presiding Bishop’s Failure to Follow the Canons ] ]On
29 March 2008 ,The Episcopal Church held a special convention inLodi , California, which "waived any potential defects in notice or other irregularities in the calling the Special Convention; allowed the Dispatch of Business Committee flexibility in presenting the convention agenda so that the chair could call special recesses as necessary, move items on the agenda for good cause, and expedite business; allowed Dispatch of Business to limit debate; as necessary;" and appointed Jerry Lamb as provisional bishop of a reorganized Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin. [ [http://www.episcopalchurch.org/79901_96094_ENG_HTM.htm Episcopal Life Online - NEWS ] ] Whether the convention and the appointment of Lamb was proper is controversial.References
External links
* [http://www.sjoaquin.net/ Diocese of San Joaquin website (Southern Cone)]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.