- Summitville mine
The Summitville Mine was a
gold mining site inRio Grande County, Colorado convert|25|mi|km|0|lk=on south of Del Norte. It is remembered for the environmental damage caused in the1980s by the accidental leakage of mining by-products into local waterways and then theAlamosa River .History
Gold was discovered at Summitville in1870 . By1885 there were more than 250 individual claims in operation. The site was soon mined out, with the weather of the 3,500 m high site adding to difficulties. The site was re-opened on a number of occasions for gold or other metals but with little success, and prior to the site's acquisition in1984 the last survey was in the early1970s forcopper . The total amount of gold extracted from the site from1873 until1959 was around 257,600 troy ounces (8,012 kg).In
1984 an area of convert|1230|acre|km2|1|lk=on was acquired by theGalactic Resources Ltd. subsidiary Summitville Consolidated Mining Company, Inc. (SCMCI). They began a new large-scale open pit operation covering convert|550|acre|km2|1. New techniques were used to extract gold from otherwise uneconomicore .The mining involved the treatment of pyritic ore with a
sodium cyanide solution to leach the gold out of the ore—heap leaching (see alsocyanide process ). The solution (leachate) was then removed from the ore and the valuable metals extracted usingactivated carbon . SCMCI leached around 10 million tons of ore on a convert|73|acre|km2|1|sing=on heap leach pad. The mining operations were finished in October 1991 with the leaching continuing until March 1992. A total of 294,365 troy ounces (9,155.8 kg) of gold and 319,814 troy ounces (9,947.3 kg) of silver were recovered. SCMCI then closed the site and converted on-site equipment for the detoxification process, with around 160 million U.S. gallons (610,000 m³) of stored water needing treatment.The cease and desist order and aftermath
In
1991 SCMCI was served with acease and desist order by the state government, concerned with metal levels in nearby water due to the run-off of excess water from the heap leach pad and through the damaged pad liner. Possibly 85,000 US gallons (320 m³) of contaminated water had leaked into nearby creeks. In December 1992 Galactic Resources Ltd. declared itself bankrupt and declared that the site clean-up operations would halt immediately. The site clean-up was undertaken by theEPA , from 1994 underSuperfund Emergency Response . The main problem was the contaminated water held in an inadequate pond system. Another source of contamination was water leaking from older underground workings. The EPA estimated that 3,000 US gallons (11 m³) were leaking from the site every minute. However, despite the water having apH of around 3 (acid ic), aUSGS study stated that the run-off was no serious threat.$155 million was spent on the site for detoxification and to reduce leakage.
Robert Friedland , the chairman of Galactic Resources Ltd. paid around $30 million in settlement. Despite cleanup efforts, cyanide,heavy metals andacid from the mine killed all aquatic life in 17 miles (27 km) of theAlamosa River . As a result, the Summitville mine spill was the worstcyanide spill in American history.Natural versus manmade pollution
Rocks in the Summitville area were millions of years ago subjected to acid-sulfate alteration, which causes the streams that drain the area to be naturally acidic and naturally high in metals. The very names of nearby creeks are evidence of poor natural water quality: Iron Creek, Alum Creek, and Bitter Creek. Mining at Summitville, by exposing more rock surface to weathering, increased acidity and concentrations of dissolved metals in runoff from the mine area. The degradation in Summitville runoff water quality has its origin in both decades-old mining structures, such as the Reynold’s adit, and the open-pit mining of 1985-1992.
Water runoff from the Summitville mine flows down Wrightman Fork, mixes with naturally acidic runoff from unmined areas, flows into the
Alamosa River and flows out of the mountains into the San Luis Valley, where it is used for crop irrigation. AUnited States Geological Survey investigation arrived at three major conclusions::”Extreme acid-rock drainage is the dominant long-term environmental concern at the Summitville mine could have been predicted given the geological characteristics of the deposit. Extensive remedial efforts are required to isolate both unweathered sulfides and soluble metal salts in the open-pit area and mine-waste piles from weathering and dissolution.”
:”It is likely that natural contamination adversely affected water quality and fish habitat in the Alamosa River long before and will continue to have adverse affects even when acid drainage from Summitville is remediated. Thus, reasonable natural conditions for the Alamosa River must be established in order to set realistic remediation conditions for the Summitville site.”
:”Results of studies as of late 1993 indicate that mining at Summitville has had no discernable short-term adverse effects on barley or alfalfa crops irrigated with Alamosa River water. Remediation of the site will help to ensure that no adverse effects occur over the longer term.” [Environmental Considerations of Active and Abandoned Mine Lands (1995) US Geological Survey, Bulletin 2220.]
References
External links
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.