Electrothermal-chemical technology

Electrothermal-chemical (ETC) technology is an attempt to increase accuracy and muzzle energy of future tank, artillery, and close-in weapon system [cite book | first=Dr Norman|last=Friedman| coauthors=David K Brown, Eric Grove, Stuart Slade, David Steigman | title=Navies in the Nuclear Age: Warships since 1945|publisher=Naval Institute Press|year=1993|pages=163|id=ISBN 1-55750-613-2] guns by improving the predictability and rate of expansion of propellants inside the barrel. Results have proven to be promising and it's very possible that electrothermal-chemical gun propulsion will be an integral part of any technologically advanced Army's future combat system, as well as the future combat systems of several other countries such as Germany and the United Kingdom. The technology has been under development since the mid-1980s and at present is actively being researched in the United States by the Army Research Laboratory, as well as various private organizations. Electrothermal-chemical technology is part of a broad research and development program that encompasses all electric gun technology, such as rail guns and coil guns. It is considered the most realistic of the three and the most mature, as well.

Background

The constant battle between armour and round has caused a near constant development of the main battle tank and this certainly had a major influence on tank design during the Cold War. In fact, current American future combat system technologies can be traced back to lethality requirements to successfully combat future Soviet tanks. It was thought in the late eighties that the protection level of the Future Soviet Tank (FST) could exceed 700 mm of rolled homogeneous armour equivalence at its maximum thickness, which was effectively immune against the contemporary M-829 armour piercing fin stabilized discarding sabot. [Ropelewski, "Soviet Gains in Armor/Antiarmor Shape US Army Master Plan", p.69] Today it is estimated that a tank gun will have to achieve muzzle energies on the level of 18 MJ — which is double the muzzle energy of current solid propellant tank propulsion systems — to be able to successfully perforate future enemy armour plating.Fact|date=August 2008 In the eighties the most immediate method available to NATO to counter Soviet advances in armour technology was the adoption of a 140 mm caliber main gun. This, however, required a redesigned turret which could incorporate the inherently larger breech and ammunition, and it would also require some sort of automatic loader. [Schemmer, "Army, SecDef's Office at Loggerheads over Antiarmor", p.53] Although the 140 mm gun was considered a real interim solution it was decided after the fall of the Soviet Union that the increase in muzzle energy was not worth the increase in weight, and therefore more money was poured into research programs which could augment the muzzle energy of existing guns to mirror that of the 140 mm gun without the incrementing weight disadvantages. Furthermore, the 140 mm did not offer the dramatic increase in muzzle velocity also required. [Ogorkiewicz, "Future tank guns", p.1378.] One of the most successful alternative technologies remains electrothermal-chemical ignition.

Most proposed advances in gun technology are based on the assumption that the solid propellant as a stand alone propulsion system is no longer capable of delivering the required muzzle energy to penetrate future tanks. This requirement has only been underscored in the west by the appearance of the Russian T-90 main battle tank, and the near future introduction of the T-95. Even the elongation of current gun tubes, such as the new German 120 mm L/55 [The length of the cannon can be found by multiplying the diameter of the barrel and the caliber length. For example, the M256, which is a 120 mm L/44, has a total length of 5.28 m, while the 120 mm L/55 has a total length of 6.6 m.] which was introduced by Rheinmetall is considered only an interim solution as it doesn't offer the dynamic increase in muzzle velocity required for the future combat system. [Sharoni, "The Future Combat System", p. 29] Even advanced kinetic energy ammunition such as the United States' M828A3 and the British L30A3 CHARM is considered only an interim solution against future threats. [Pengelley, "The new era in tank main armament", p.1522] To that extent the solid propellant is considered to have reached the end of its tether, although it will remain the principal propulsion method for at least the next decade until newer technologies mature to a level where they can be successfully implemented. [Sharoni, "The Future Combat System", p.30] To improve on the capabilities of a solid propellant weapon the electrothermal-chemical gun may see production as early as 2016. [Kruse, "Studies on Germany's Future 140 mm Tank Gun System", p. 1]

ETC technology offers a medium-risk upgrade and is to the point, currently, where changes for maturity are so minor that it can be considered as a realistic replacement for current solid propellant guns within the next two decades. The lightweight American 120 mm XM-291 was extremely close to achieving 17 MJ of muzzle energy which is the lower-end muzzle energy spectrum for a 140 mm gun. [Diamond, "Electro Thermal Chemical Gun Technology Study", p.5] However, the success of the XM-291 doesn't imply the success of ETC technology as there are key parts of the propulsion system that are not yet understood or fully developed, such as the plasma ignition process. Nevertheless, there is substantial existing evidence that ETC technology is viable and something worth the money to continue development. Furthermore, it can be integrated into current gun systems. [Sauerwein, "Rheinmetall's NPzK"] However, technology maturity requires a further understanding of the technology itself.

How it works

An electrothermal-chemical gun uses a plasma cartridge to ignite and control the ammunition's propellant, using electrical energy as a catalyst to begin the process. Originally researched by Dr. Jon Parmentola for the U.S. Army, it has grown into a very plausible successor to a standard solid propellant tank gun. Since the beginning of research the United States has funded the XM-291 gun project with USD 4,000,000, basic research with USD 300,000, and applied research with USD 600,000.Fact|date=August 2008 Since then it has been proven to work, although efficiency to the level required has not yet been accomplished. ETC increases the performance of conventional solid propellants, reduces the effect of temperature on propellant expansion and allows for more advanced, higher density propellants to be used. It will also reduce pressure placed on the barrel in comparison to alternative technologies that offer the same muzzle energy given the fact that it helps spread the propellant's gas much more smoothly during ignition. [Hilmes, "Aspects of future MBT conception"] Currently, there are two principal methods of plasma initiation: the flashboard large area emitter (FLARE) and the triple coaxial plasma igniter (TCPI).

Flashboard large area emitter

Flashboards run in several parallel strings to provide a large area of plasma or ultraviolet radiation and uses the breakdown and vaporization of gaps of diamonds to produce the required plasma. These parallel strings are mounted in tubes and oriented to have their gaps azimuthal to the tube's axis. It discharges by using high pressure air to move air out of the way. [Diamond, "Electro Thermal Chemical Gun Technology Study", p.11-12] FLARE initiators can ignite propellants through the release of plasma, or even through the use of ultraviolet heat radiation. [Diamond, "Electro Thermal Chemical Gun Technology Study", p.13-15] The absorption length of a solid propellant is sufficient enough to be ignited by radiation from a plasma source. However, FLARE has most likely not reached optimal design requirements and further understanding of FLARE and how it works is completely necessary to ensure the evolution of the technology. If FLARE provided the XM-291 gun project with the sufficient radiative heat to ignite the propellant to achieve a muzzle energy of 17 MJ one could only imagine the possibilities with a fully developed FLARE plasma igniter. Current areas of study include how plasma will affect the propellant through radiation, the deliverance of mechanical energy and heat directly and by driving gas flow. Despite these daunting tasks FLARE has been seen as the most plausible igniter for future application on ETC guns. [For further technical information on FLARE "see:" P. Diamond]

Triple coaxial plasma igniter

A coaxial igniter consists of a fully insulated conductor, covered by four strips of aluminum foil. All of this is further insulated in a tube about 1.6 cm in diameter which is perforated with small holes. The idea is to use an electrical flow through the conductor and then exploding the flow into vapor and then breaking it down into plasma. Consequently, the plasma would escape through the constant perforations throughout the insulating tube and initiate the surrounding propellant. A TCPI igniter would be fitted in individual propellant cases for each piece of ammunition. However, TCPI is no longer a viable method of propellant ignition because it has the possibility of damaging the fins, and does not deliver energy as efficiently as a FLARE igniter does. [TCPI is also covered in "Electro Thermal Chemical Gun Technology Study" by P. Diamond]

Feasibility

The XM-291 is the best existing example of a working electrothermal-chemical gun. It was an alternate technology to the heavier caliber 140 mm gun by using the dual-caliber approach. It uses a breech that is large enough to accept 140 mm ammunition and be mounted with both a 120 mm barrel and a 135 mm or 140 mm barrel. The XM-291 also mounts a larger gun tube and a larger ignition chamber than the existing M256 L/44 main gun. [Pengelley, "A new era in tank main armament", p. 1522] Through the application of electrothermal-chemical technology the XM-291 has been able to achieve muzzle energy outputs that equate that to a low-level 140 mm gun, while achieving muzzle velocities greater than those which can be achieved by using the larger 140 mm gun. [Sharoni, "The Future Combat System", p.31] Although the XM-291 does not immediately mean that ETC technology is viable at this current point in time it does offer an example that it is possible and that continued research in the area is worth the advantages reaped if such a system was to be successfully implemented on a modern tank.

ETC is also a more viable option than other alternatives by definition. ETC requires much less energy input from outside sources, like a battery, than a railgun or a coilgun would. Tests have shown that energy output by the propellant is higher than energy input from outside sources on ETC guns. [P. Diamond, "Electro Thermal Chemical Gun Technology Study"] In comparison, a rail gun currently cannot achieve a higher muzzle velocity than the amount of energy input. Even at 50% efficiency a rail gun launching a projectile with a kinetic energy of 20 MJ would require an energy input into the rails of 40 MJ, and 50% efficiency has not yet been achieved. [Horst, "Recent Advances in Anti-Armor Technology", p.6] To put this into perspective, a rail gun launching at 9 MJ of energy would need roughly 32 MJ worth of energy from capacitors. Current advances in energy storage allow for energy densities as high as 2.5 MJ/m³ which means that a battery delivering 32 MJ of energy would require a volume of 12.8 m³; this is not a viable volume for use in a modern main battle tank, especially one designed to be lighter than existing models. [Zahn, "The Future Combat System: Minimizing Risk While Maximizing Capability", p.20] There has even been discussion about eliminating the necessity for an outside electrical source in ETC ignition by initiating the plasma cartridge through a small explosive force. [Yangmeng, "A Novel Concept of Electrothermal Chemical Gun without Power Supply", p.1]

Furthermore, ETC technology is not only applicable to solid propellants. To increase muzzle velocity even further electrothermal-chemical ignition can work with liquid propellants, although this would require further research into plasma ignition. ETC technology is also compatible with existing projects to reduce the amount of recoil delivered to the vehicle while firing. Understandably, recoil of a gun firing a projectile at 17 MJ or more will increase directly with the increase in muzzle energy in accordance to Newton's third law of motion and successful implementation of recoil reduction mechanisms will be vital to the installation of an ETC powered gun in an existing vehicle design. For example, Italy's OTO Melara's new lightweight 120 mm L/45 gun has achieved a recoil force of 25 t by using a longer recoil mechanism (550 mm) and a pepperpot muzzle brake. [Hilmes, "Arming Future MBTs", p.79] Reduction in recoil can also be achieved through mass attenuation of the thermal sleeve. The ability of ETC technology to be applied to existing gun designs means that for future gun upgrades there's no longer the necessity to redesign the turret to include a larger breech or caliber gun barrel.

Several countries have already determined that ETC technology is viable for the future and have funded indigenous projects considerably. These include the United States, Germany [Hilmes, "Modern German Tank Development", p.20-21.] and the United Kingdom, amongst others. The United States' XM360, which is planned to equip the Future Combat Systems Mounted Combat System light tank and may be the M1 Abrams' next gun upgrade, is reportedly based on the XM291 and may include ETC technology, or portions of ETC technology. Tests of this gun have been performed using "precision ignition" technology which may refer to ETC ignition.

Notes

Bibliography

* cite paper
author = P. Diamond
title = Electro Thermal Chemical Gun Technology Study
publisher = The MITRE Corporation
version =
date = March 1999
url =
format =
accessdate =
* cite journal
last = Hilmes
first = Rolf
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Arming Future MBTs - Some Considerations
journal = Military Technology
volume =
issue = 12/2004
pages = 4
publisher = Moench Verlagsgesellschaft Mbh
month = December | year = 2004
url =
doi =
id =
accessdate =
* cite journal
last = Hilmes
first = Rolf
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Aspects of future MBT conception
journal = Military Technology
volume = 23
issue = 6
pages = 7
publisher = Moench Verlagsgesellschaft Mbh
date = June 30, 1999
url =
doi =
id =
accessdate =
* cite journal
last = Hilmes
first = Rolf
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Battle Tanks for the Bundeswher: Modern German Tank Development, 1956-2000
journal = Armor
volume =
issue = January-February 2001
pages = 6
publisher = Fort Knox: US Army Armor Center
date = January 1, 2001
url =
doi =
id = ISSN 0004-2420
accessdate =
* cite paper
author = Albert W. Horst, et al.
title = Recent advances in anti-armor technology
publisher = American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
version =
year = 1997
url =
format =
accessdate =
* cite paper
author = Dr. Josef Kruse
title = Study on Germany's Future 140mm Tank Gun System - Conventional and ETC -
version =
publisher = Rheinmetall
date = April 1999
url =
format =
accessdate =
* cite journal
last = Ogorkiewicz
first = Richard M.
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Future tank guns Part I: solid and liquid propellant guns
journal = International Defense Review
volume =
issue = 12/1990
pages = 4
publisher = Janes
month = December | year = 1990
url =
doi =
id =
accessdate =
* cite journal
last = Pengelley
first = Rupert
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = A new era in tank main armament: The options multiply
journal = International Defense Review
volume =
issue = 11/1989
pages = 7
publisher = Janes
month = November | year = 1989
url =
doi =
id =
accessdate =
* cite journal
last = Ropelewski
first = Robert R.
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Soviet Gains in Armor/Antiarmor Shape US Army Master Plan
journal = Armed Forces Journal International
volume =
issue =
pages = 6
publisher = U.S. Army
month = February | year = 1989
url =
doi =
id =
accessdate =
* cite journal
last = Schemmer
first = Benjamin F.
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Army, SecDef's Office at Loggerheads over Antiarmor
journal = Armed Forces Journal International
volume =
issue =
pages = 4
publisher = U.S. Army
month = May | year = 1989
url =
doi =
id =
accessdate =
* cite journal
last = Sharoni
first = Asher H.
authorlink =
coauthors = Lawrence D. Bacon
title = The Future Combat System (FCS): Technology Evolution Review and Feasibility Assessment
journal = Armor
volume =
issue = September-October 1997
pages = 6
publisher = Fort Knox: US Army Armor Center
date = September 1, 1997
url =
doi =
id = ISSN 0004-2420
accessdate =
* cite journal
last = Sauerwein
first = Brigitte
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Rheinmetall's NPzK: Conventional technology for counterng future MBTs
journal = International Defense Review
volume =
issue = 2/1990
pages = 2
publisher = Janes
month = February | year = 1990
url =
doi =
id =
accessdate =
* cite paper
author = Tian Yangmeng, et al.
title = A Novel Concept of Electrothermal Chemical Gun without Power Supply
version =
publisher =
date =
url =
format = PDF
accessdate =
* cite paper
author = Brian R. Zahn
title = The Future Combat System: Minimizing Risk While Maximizing Capability
publisher = U.S. Army
version =
date = May 2000
url =
format = Strategy Research Project
accessdate =

External links

* [http://www.emlsymposium.org/ Electromagnetic Launch Symposium]
* http://www.powerlabs.org/electrothermal.htm