- Subgroup growth
Im
mathematics , subgroup growth is a branch ofgroup theory , dealing with quantitative questions aboutsubgroup s of a given group. [citebook|title=Subgroup Growth|author=Alexander Lubotzky, Dan Segal|year=2003|publisher=Birkhäuser|id=ISBN 3764369892]Let "G" be a
finitely generated group . Then, for each integer "n" define "n"("G") to be the number of subgroups "U" of index "n" in "G". Similarly, if "G" is atopological group , "s_n(G)" denotes the number of open subgroups "U" of index "n" in "G". One similarly defines 'm_n(G) and to denote the number of maximal andnormal subgroup s of index "n", respectively.Subgroup growth studies these functions, their interplay, and the characterization of group theoretical properties in terms of these functions.
The theory was motivated by the desire to enumerate finite groups of given order, and the analogy with Mikhail Gromov's notion of word growth.
Nilpotent groups
Let "G" be a finitely generated torsionfree
nilpotent group . Then there exists acomposition series with infinite cyclic factors, which induces a bijection (not though necessarily a homomorphism).:"Z""n" → G
such that group multiplication can be expressed by polynomial functions in these coordinates; in particular, the multiplication is definable. Using methods from the
model theory ofp-adic integer s, F. Grunewald, D. Segal and G. Smith showed that thelocal zeta function :is arational function in "p"−"s'.As an example, let "G" be the discrete
Heisenberg group . This group has apresentation with generators "x, y, z" and relations :Hence, elements of "G" can be represented as triples "(a, b, c)" of integers with group operation given by:To each finite indexsubgroup "U" of "G", associate the set of all ``good bases´´ of "U" as follows. Note that "G" has anormal series :with infinite cyclicfactors . A triple "(g_1, g_2, g_3)" in "G" is called a "good basis" of "U", if "g_1, g_2, g_3" generate "U", and . In general, it is quite complicated to determine the set of good bases for a fixed subgroup "U". To overcome this difficulty, one determines the set of all good bases of all finiteindex subgroups, and determines how many of these belong to one given subgroup. To make this precise, one has to embed the Heisenberg group over the integers into the group overp-adic number s. After some computations, one arrives at the formula:where μ is theHaar measure on "Z""p", denotes the p-adic absolute value and is the set of tuples of "p"-adic integers :such that:is a good basis of some finite-index subgroup. The latter condition can be translated into:.
Now, the integral can be transformed into an iterated sum to yield:where the final evaluation consists of repeated application of the formula for the value of the
geometric series . From this we deduce that ζ"G"("s") can be expressed in terms of theRiemann zeta function as:For more complicated examples, the computations become difficult, and in general one cannot expect a
closed expression for ζ"G"("s"). The local factor:
can always be expressed as a definable "p"-adic integral. Applying a result of
MacIntyre on themodel theory of "p"-adic integers, one deduces again that ζ"G"("s") is a rational function in "p−"s". Moreover,M. du Sautoy and F. Grunewald showed that the integral can be approximated byArtin L-function s. Using the fact thatArtin L-function s are holomorphic in a neighbourhood of the line , they showed that for any torsionfree nilpotent group, the function ζ"G"("s") ismeromorphic in the domain:Re "s" > α − δ,
where α is the
abscissa of convergence of ζ"G"("s"), and δ is some positive number, and holomorphic in some neighbourhood of . Using aTauberian theorem this implies:for some real number α and a non-negative integer "k".Congruence subgroups
ubgroup growth and coset representations
Let "G" be a group, "U" a subgroup of index . Then "G" acts on the set of left
coset s of "U" in "G" by left shift::.
In this way, "U" induces a
homomorphism of "G" into thesymmetric group on . "G" acts transitively on , and vice versa, given a transitive action of "G" on:,
the stabilizer of the point 1 is a subgroup of index in "G". Since the set
:
can be permuted in
:
ways, we find that is equal to the number of transitive "G"-actions divided by . Among all "G"-actions, we can distinguish transitive actions by a
sifting argument , to arrive at the following formula:
where denotes the number of homomorphisms
:.
In several instances the function is easier to be approached then , and, if grows sufficiently large, the sum is of negligible order of magnitude, hence, one obtains an
asymptotic formula for .As an example, let be the
free group on two generators. Then every map of the generators of extends to a homomorphism:,
that is,
:.
From this we deduce
:.
For more complicated examples, the estimation of involves the
representation theory andstatistical properties of symmetric groups .References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.