- Short chronology timeline
The short chronology is one chronology of the Near Eastern Bronze and Early Iron Age, which fixes the reign of
Hammurabi to 1728 BC – 1686 BC and thesack of Babylon to 1531 BC.The absolute
2nd millennium BC dates resulting from this decision currently have a majority (though not unanimous) support in academia, although the middle chronology (reign of Hammurabi 1792 BC – 1750 BC) is commonly encountered in older literature.Early Bronze Age
Estimation of absolute dates becomes possible in the 2nd half of the 3rd millennium BC. For the first half of the 3rd millennium, only very rough chronological matching of archaeological dates with written records is possible.
Kings of Ebla
The city-states of Ebla and Mari contested for power at this time. Eventually, under Irkab-Damu, Ebla defeats Mari for control of the region just in time to face the rise of
Uruk and Akkad. After years of back and forth, Ebla is destroyed by theAkkadian Empire . Pottery seals of the Egyptian pharaohPepi I have been found in the wreckage of the city. [A Victory over Mari and the Fall of Ebla, Alfonso Archi, Maria Giovanna Biga, Journal of Cuneiform Studies, Vol. 55, 2003, pp. 1-44];Gutian Kings
First appearing in the area during the reign of
Sargon ofAkkad , the Guti became a regional power after the decline of theAkkadian Empire followingShar-kali-sharri . The dynasty ends with the defeat of the last king, Tirigan, byUruk .Only a handful of the Guti kings are attested to by inscriptions, aside from theSumerian king list . [Reallexikon der Assyriologie by Erich Ebling, Bruno Meissner, 1993, Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 311003705X];Third Dynasty of Ur (Sumerian Renaissance)
In an apparently peaceful transition,
Ur came to power after the end of the reign ofUtu-hengal ofUruk , with the first king, Ur-Namma, solidifying his power with the defeat ofLagash . By the dynasty's end with the destruction of Ur byElam ites andShimashki , the dynasty included little more than the area around Ur. [The Ancient Near East: C.3000-330 B.C. By Amélie Kuhrt, Routledge, 1995, ISBN 0415167620] [Ur III Period (2112-2004 BC) by Douglas Frayne, University of Toronto Press, 1997, ISBN 0802041981] [ [http://cdli.ucla.edu/staff/dahl/dissertation.pdf The ruling family of Ur III Umma. A Prosopographical Analysis of an Elite Family in Southern Iraq 4000 Years ago] , J.L. Dahl, UCLA dissertation, 2003];First Babylonian Dynasty (Dynasty I)
Following the fall of the Ur III Dynasty, the resultant power vacuum was contested by
Isin andLarsa , with Babylon andAssyria later joining the fray. In the second half of the reign ofHammurabi ,Babylon became the preeminent power, a position it largely maintained until the sack byMursili I in 1531 BC. Note that there are no contemporary accounts of the sack of Babylon. It is inferred from much later documents. [ [http://www.livius.org/cg-cm/chronicles/abc20/kings.html Chronicle of early kings] at Livius.org] [ [http://www.hittites.info/translations.aspx?text=translations/historical%2fTelipinuProclamation.html The Proclamation of Telipinu] ];Mitanni
Perhaps because the capital of Mitanni,
Washukanni , has not yet been found, there are no available king lists, year lists, or royal inscriptions. Fortunately, a fair amount of diplomatic, Hittite, andAssyrian sources exist to firm up the chronology. Having become powerful under Shaushtatar, Mitanni eventually falls into the traditional trap of dynasties, the contest for succession. Tushratta and Artatama II both claim the kingship and the Hittites and Assyrians take advantage of the situation. After that, Mitanni was no longer a factor in the region. [ [http://www.thebritishmuseum.ac.uk/pdf/6b%20Pharaoh%20and%20his%20Brothers.pdf Pharaoh and his Brothers] , S Jakob] [Letters of the Great Kings of the Ancient Near East, Trevor Bryce, Routledge, 2003, ISBN 041525857X];Kings of Ugarit
A client state of
Mitanni and later theHittites , Ugarit was nonetheless a significant player in the region. While regnal lengths and an absolute chronology for Ugarit are not yet available, the known order of kings and some firm synchronisms make it reasonably placeable in time. The fall of Ugarit has been narrowed down to the range from the reign ofPharaoh Merneptah to the 8th year ofPharaoh Rameses III of Egypt. This is roughly the same time thatHattusa is destroyed. [Handbook of Ugaritic Studies, edited by Wilfred G. E. Watson and Nicolas Wyatt, Brill, 1999, ISBN 9004109889] [The City of Ugarit at Tell Ras Shamra, Marguerite Yon, Eisenbrauns, 2006, ISBN 1575060299];BabylonDynasties IV to X of Babylon (post-Kassite):
;Classical Antiquity
For times after
Assurbanipal (died 627 BC), see:
*Median Empire (728 – 549 BC), seeList of Kings of the Medes
*Neo-Babylonian Empire (626 – 539 BC)
*Achaemenid Empire (550 – 330 BC)The
Hellenistic period begins with the conquests ofAlexander the Great in 330 BC.Notes
ee also
*
Timeline of the Middle East
*Chronology of the ancient Near East References
*"Chronology at the Crossroads: The Late Bronze Age in Western Asia", Bernard Newgrosh, Troubador Publishing, 2007, ISBN 1906221626
*"The Kingdom of the Hittites". (New Edition), Trevor Bryce, Oxford University Press, 2005, ISBN 0199281327
*"A History of the Ancient Near East ca. 3000 – 323 BC", Marc Van De Mieroop, Wiley-Blackwell, 2006, ISBN 1405149116
*"Mesopotamia: The Invention of the City", Gwendolyn Leick, Penguin, 2003, ISBN 0140265740
*H.Gasche, J.A.Armstrong, S.W.Cole and V.G.Gurzadyan, "Dating the Fall of Babylon" (1998).External links
* [http://cdli.ucla.edu/ Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative]
* [http://www.livius.org/cg-cm/chronicles/chron00.html Chronicles at Livius.org]
* [http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/ Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.