- E-mail marketing
E-mail marketing is a form of
direct marketing which useselectronic mail as a means of communicating commercial or fundraising messages to an audience. In its broadest sense, every e-mail sent to a potential or current customer could be considered e-mail marketing. However, the term is usually used to refer to:* sending e-mails with the purpose of enhancing the relationship of a merchant with its current or previous customers and to encourage
customer loyalty and repeat business,
* sending e-mails with the purpose of acquiring new customers or convincing current customers to purchase something immediately,
* addingadvertisements to e-mails sent by other companies to their customers, and
* sending e-mails over theInternet , as e-mail did and does exist outside the Internet (e.g., network e-mail andFIDO ).Researchers estimate that
United States firms alone spent US$400 million on e-mail marketing in 2006. [DMA: "The Power of Direct Marketing: ROI, Sales, Expenditures and Employment in the U.S., 2006-2007 Edition", Direct Marketing Association, October 2006]Advantages
E-mail marketing (on the Internet) is popular with companies for several reasons:
*A mailing list provides the ability to distribute information to a wide range of specific, potential customers at a relatively low cost.
*Compared to other media investments such asdirect mail or printednewsletters , e-mail is less expensive.
*An exactreturn on investment can be tracked ("track to basket") and has proven to be high when done properly. E-mail marketing is often reported as second only tosearch marketing as the most effective online marketing tactic. [Brownlow, M: [http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/basics/why.htm "Why do email marketing?"] , E-mail Marketing Reports, September 2008]
*The delivery time for an e-mail message is short (i.e., seconds or minutes) as compared to a mailed advertisement (i.e., one or more days).
*An advertiser is able to "push" the message to its audience, as opposed towebsite -based advertising, which relies on a customer to visit that website.
*E-mail messages are easy to track. An advertiser can track users via autoresponders,web bugs , bounce messages, unsubscribe requests,read receipts , click-throughs, etc. These mechanisms can be used to measure open rates, positive or negative responses, and to correlate sales with marketing.
*Advertisers can generate repeat business affordably and automatically.
*Advertisers can reach substantial numbers of e-mail subscribers who have opted in (i.e., consented) to receive e-mail communications on subjects of interest to them.
*Over half ofInternet users check or send e-mail on a typical day. [Pew Internet & American Life Project, [http://www.pewinternet.org/trends.asp "Tracking surveys"] , March 2000 – March 2007]
*Specific types of interaction with messages can trigger (1) other messages to be delivered automatically, or (2) other events, such as updating the profile of the recipient to indicate a specific interest category.
*E-mail marketing is paper-free (i.e., "green").Disadvantages
Many companies use e-mail marketing to communicate with existing customers, but many other companies send unsolicited bulk e-mail, also known as "spam".
Internet system administrators have always considered themselves responsible for dealing with "abuse of the net", but not "abuse "on" the net". That is, they will act quite vigorously against spam, but will leave issues such as
libel ortrademark infringement to the legal system. Most administrators possess a passionate dislike for spam, which they define as "any" unsolicited e-mail.Draconian measures—such as taking down a corporate website, with or without warning—are entirely normal responses to spamming. Typically, theterms of service in Internet companies' contracts permit such actions; therefore, the spammer often has no recourse.Illicit e-mail marketing predates legitimate e-mail marketing. On the early Internet (i.e.,
Arpanet ), it was not permitted to use the medium for commercial purposes. As a result, marketers attempting to establish themselves as legitimate businesses in e-mail marketing have had an uphill battle, hampered also by criminal spam operations billing themselves as legitimate ones.It is frequently difficult for observers to distinguish between legitimate and spam e-mail marketing. First, spammers attempt to represent themselves as legitimate operators. Second, direct-marketing political groups such as the United States Direct Marketing Association (DMA) have pressured legislatures to legalize activities that some Internet operators consider to be spamming, such as the sending of "opt-out" unsolicited commercial e-mail. Third, the sheer volume of spam has led some users to mistake legitimate commercial e-mail for spam. This situation arises when a user receives e-mail from a mailing list to which he/she subscribes. Additional confusion arises when both legitimate and spam messages have a similar appearance, as when messages include
HTML and graphics.One effective technique used by established email marketing companies is to require what is known as the "double opt-in" method of requiring a potential recipient to manually confirm their request for information by clicking a unique link and entering a unique code identifier to confirm that the owner of the recipient email address has indeed requested the information. Responsible e-mail marketing and autoresponder companies use this double opt-in method to confirm each request before any information is sent out.
A report issued by the e-mail services company Return Path, as of mid-2008 e-mail deliverability is still an issue for legitimate marketers. According to the report, legitimate e-mail servers averaged a delivery rate of 56%; twenty percent of the messages were rejected, and eight percent were filtered. [Return Path's Reputation Benchmark Report: [http://www.btobonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080731/FREE/180513096/1116/FREE "5 ways to increase deliverability"] , "BtoB Magazine", July 2008]
Due to the volume of spam e-mail on the Internet, spam filters are essential to most users. Some marketers report that legitimate commercial e-mail messages frequently get caught and hidden by filters; however, it is somewhat less common for e-mail users to complain that spam filters block legitimate mail.
Companies considering the use of an e-mail marketing program must make sure that their program does not violate spam laws such as the United States' Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (
CAN-SPAM ), [http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/canspam.htm The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003] online at ftc.gov or [http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/canspam.pdf PDF Version] ] the European Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003, or theirInternet service provider 'sacceptable use policy . Even if a company adheres to the applicable laws, it can beblacklisted (e.g., onSPEWS ) if Internet e-mail administrators determine that the company is sending spam.CAN-SPAM compliance
The
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 authorizes a US$11,000 penalty per violation for spamming each individual recipient. Therefore, many commercial e-mail marketers within the United States utilize a service or special software to ensure compliance with the Act. A variety of older systems exist that do not ensure compliance with the Act. To comply with the Act's regulation of commercial e-mail, services typically require users to authenticate their return address and include a valid physical address, provide a one-click unsubscribe feature, and prohibit importing lists of purchased addresses that may not have given valid permission.In addition to satisfying legal requirements, e-mail service providers began to help customers establish and manage their own e-mail marketing campaigns. The service providers supply e-mail templates, as well as methods for handling subscriptions and cancellations automatically. They also provide statistics pertaining to the number of messages received and opened, and whether the recipients clicked on any
links within the messages.The CAN-SPAM Act was recently updated with some new regulations that went into effect on July 7, 2008.
Opt-in e-mail advertising
Opt-in e-mail advertising, or
permission marketing , is a method of advertising via e-mail whereby the recipient of the advertisement has consented to receive it. This method is one of several developed by marketers to eliminate the disadvantages of e-mail marketing.Fairhead, N. (2003) “All hail the brave new world of permission marketing via email” ("Media" 16, August 2003)]Opt-in e-mail marketing may evolve into a technology that uses a handshake protocol between the sender and receiver. This system is intended to eventually result in a high degree of satisfaction between consumers and marketers. If opt-in e-mail advertising is used, the material that is e-mailed to consumers will be "anticipated". It is assumed that the consumer wants to receive it, which makes it unlike unsolicited advertisements sent to the consumer. Ideally, opt-in e-mail advertisements will be more personal and relevant to the consumer than untargeted advertisements.
A common example of permission marketing is a newsletter sent to an advertising firm's customers. Such newsletters inform customers of upcoming events or promotions, or new products. [Dilworth, Dianna. (2007) [http://www.dmnews.com/Ruths-Chris-Steak-House-sends-sizzling-e-mails-for-special-occasions/article/94733/ Ruth's Chris Steak House sends sizzling e-mails for special occasions] , "DMNews" retrieved on February 19, 2008] In this type of advertising, a company that wants to send a newsletter to their customers may ask them at the point of purchase if they would like to receive the newsletter.
With a foundation of opted-in contact information stored in their
database , marketers can send out promotional materials automatically. They can also segment their promotions to specific market segments. [O'Brian J. & Montazemia, A. (2004) "Management Information Systems" (Canada: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd.)]References
ee also
* Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail (CAUCE)
*Customer engagement
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.