- God and Other Minds
God and Other Minds is the name of a 1967 book by
Alvin Plantinga which re-kindled serious philosophical debate on theExistence of God in Anglophone philosophical circles [see eg "The Rationality of Theism" quotingQuentin Smith "God is not 'dead' in academia; he returned to life in the late 1960s". They specifically relate this to Planting's God and Other Minds, and cite "the shift from hostility towards theism in Paul Edawards's "Encycolepdia of Philosophy" (1967) to sympathy towards theism in the more recentRouteledge Encycolpedia of Philosophy ] by arguing that belief in God was like belief in other minds: although neither could be demonstrated conclusively against a determined sceptic both were fundamentally rational. This article is about the book "and" the philosophical argument, which has been developed and criticised by Plantinga and others in the succeeding 40 years.The Book God and Other Minds
"God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God" was originally published by Cornell University Press in (1967). An edition with a new preface by Plantinga was published in 1990 (ISBN 978-0801497353). The book has the following chapters:
Part I: Natural Theology
* Ch 1: The Cosmological Argument
* Ch 2: The Ontological Argument - I
* Ch 3: The Ontological Argument - II
* Ch 4: The Teleological ArgumentPart II: Natural Atheology
* Ch 5: The Problem of Evil
* Ch 6: The Freewill Defense
* Ch 7: Verificationism and other AtheologicaPart III: God and Other Minds
* Ch 8: Other Minds and Analogy
* Ch 9: Alternatives to the Analogical Position
* Ch 10: God and AnalogyReaction of notable commentators
The book has been widely cited [by at least 65 other books [http://www.amazon.com/dp/0801497353/ Amazon.com citations of God and Other Minds] and many other articles [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&cites=1806443698209417268 Google Scholar though this seems to have missed many citations] ]
* Michael A. Slote in
The Journal of Philosophy [The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 67, No. 2 (Jan. 29, 1970), pp. 39-45 doi:10.2307/2024569] considered that "This book is one of the most impotant to have appeared in this century on the philosophy of religion, and makes outstanding contributions to our understanding of the problem of other minds as well".ubsequent development of the Argment
The psychologist
Justin L. Barrett suggests that "Believing that other humans have minds arises from many of the same mental tools and environmental information from which belief in gods or God comes...no scientific evidence exists that proves people have minds" ["Why would anyone believe in God" ISBN 0759106673 p 95] and that "although some small number of academics...claim to believe that people do not have minds...they do not socially interact in accordance with such a belief ... [and] such a peculiar belief about minds (whether or not is is true) simply will not spread...a huge number of mental tools all converge on the nonreflective belief in minds" [ "op. cit." pp 96-97]ee also
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/other-minds/ SEP article on Other Minds]
Notes and References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.