- Battle of Coleto
Infobox Military Conflict
conflict =Battle of Coleto
partof =theTexas Revolution , and theGoliad campaign
caption =James Fannin, commander of Texian forces during the Battle of Coleto.
date =19-20 March 1836
place =Goliad County ,Texas
territory =
result =Mexican victory
status =
combatant1 =flag|Mexico|1823|size=40px
combatant2 =flag|Republic of Texas|Burnet|size=40px
combatant3 =
commander1 =José de Urrea
commander2 =James W. Fannin, Jr W, POW
commander3 =
strength1 =19th: 80cavalrymen , 260infantrymen , 20th: 700-1,000 men
strength2 =300 men, 9cannon s
strength3 =
casualties1 =Unknown
casualties2 =At least 10 dead, 60 woundedCitation |last=Roell|first=Craig|title="Battle of Coleto"|url=http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/CC/qec1.html]
casualties3 =
notes = "This is an article about the battle that led to the surrender of Texian troops who were later involved in the Goliad Massacre. For more information about the massacre, seeGoliad Massacre ".The Battle of Coleto, also known as the Battle of Coleto Creek, the Battle of the Prairie, and the Batalla del encinal del Perdido, was a battle during the
Goliad campaign of theTexas Revolution . The two combatants wereMexico , and theRepublic of Texas . The battle took place inGoliad County , which is located in Texas. The battle was fought from19 March , to20 March 1836. Mexico won the battle.The majority of the
Texian ["Texians" is the correct name for the Anglo-American inhabitants of Texas during the Texas Revolution, as opposed to the word "Texans". See de la Teja (1997), p. 79.] soldiers that surrendered were later killed during theGoliad Massacre , which took place on27 March 1836. The battle demonstrated that the Texian commander, James W. Fannin, Jr, had both underestimated the Mexican army against him and did not make quick decisions. The battle showed that the Mexican commander,José de Urrea , had good knowledge of Texian plans and that he had the skill to exploit opportunities. The untrained Texian soldiers had shown that they were disciplined against the Mexicans. The Mexican victory resulted in Urrea's standing increasing which resulted in other Mexican generals, includingAntonio López de Santa Anna , becoming more jealous of him. The Mexican victory also resulted in Mexican leaders becoming overconfident, believing that a Mexican victory over Texas was near.Background
Colonel James Fannin was the commander of the Texian troops at Fort Defiance in late 1835 and early 1836. During the siege of the
Alamo in February of 1836 he attempted a march of 100 miles to relieve the Texian forces at the Alamo but due to poor preparation for the journey and word thatgeneral Urrea 's Mexican forces were approachingGoliad , he turned back. After the Alamo fell toSanta Anna 's forces the Texians received orders from GeneralSam Houston to fall back to Victoria. Fannin therefore abandoned the fort but proceeded without adaquate supplies and without haste on his retreat.Prelude
By 09:00 on
March 19 they began their retreat from Goliad, during a period of heavy fog. The Texian force included the San Antonio Greys, the Red Rovers, the Mustangs commanded byBurr H. Duval , a militia from Refugio commanded by a man named Frazer, Texian regular soldiers commanded by Ira Westover, and the Mobile Greys. Nine heavy artillery pieces with different calibers were ordered by Fannin to be taken by the Texians, along with 1000 muskets, but he neglected to ensure that a good amount of food and water was transported. Carts loaded with heavy equipment were being pulled by hungry and tiredoxen . Urrea did not realise the Texians had left until 11:00. The two hour lead was removed, when a Texian cart crossing theSan Antonio River broke, a cannon had to be brought out of the river, and Fannin ordered that the oxen be allowed to graze for a period of time after the Texians had proceeded about a mile past Manahuilla Creek, resulting in the retreat being stopped. John Shackelford, Burr H. Duval, and Ira Westover opposed Fannin's decision to allow the oxen to graze, arguing that they should continue their retreat until they reached the protection of the Coleto Creek timber. Shackelford would state that Fannin argued that the Mexican army against them was poor, and that Urrea would not follow them.In an effort to catch Fannin's troops Urrea left his artillery, and some of his men, in Goliad. He began his pursuit with, according to Mexican sources, 80 cavalrymen and 360 infantrymen. Mexican mounted scouts determined the location of the Texians, and reported the size of the force, which Urrea concluded was smaller than he originally thought. As a result, he ordered 100 of his soldiers to go back to Goliad to help secure Presidio La Bahía. He also ordered the artillery he left in Goliad to be brought to him, and that the artilley would be escorted by some of the soldiers he was sending back. Meanwhile, Horton's 30 cavalrymen were serving as advance guards, and were positioned to cover all sides of the Texian force. The rear guard was not alert, and did not detect the Mexican cavalry that was approaching the Texians. Shortly after they resumed their march another Texian cart broke down, and its cargo had to be transferred to another one, delaying the retreat again. Shortly after Fannin had sent Horton to scout the Coleto Creek timber that was in sight, the Mexican cavalry overtook the Texians. As the Texians tried to get to high ground 400 to 500 yards away from the position they were in when the cavalry overtook them, the ammunition cart broke.
Battle
The Texian soldiers formed a square against the Mexicans. The high grass of the prairie meant the Texian view of the Mexicans was impaired. The Texians had little water. Each Texian soldier received three to four muskets. The square was three ranks deep. The front line contained the San Antonio Greys and Red Rovers, whilst Duval's Mustangs and Frazer's Refugio militia formed part of the rear line. The left flank was covered by Westover's regulars, whilst the right was protected by the Mobile Greys. In the corners of the square, the artillery had been positioned. Fannin stood in the rear of the right flank. In addition, a number of sharpshooters were deployed around Abel Morgan's hospital wagon, which could no longer be moved after the ox that was moving it was killed by Mexican fire.
The Mexican soldiers then attacked the square. The left of the Texian square was confronted by the rifle companies under Morales, and the right was assaulted by the grenadiers and part of the San Luis Battalion. The Mexican formations involved in this attack on the right of the square was under the personal supervision of Urrea. The Jiménez Battalion under Col. Mariano Salas fought the front, and Col. Gabriel Núñez's cavalry was ordered against the rear of the square. By sunset, when Urrea ordered the Mexicans to cease any more major attacks against the square due to a lack of Mexican ammunition, the majority of the action of 19 March was over. The Mexicans had assaulted the square three times. Making effective use of their bayonets, multiple muskets, and nine cannons, the Texians had prevented the Mexicans each time from breaking the square. Urrea said that he was impressed with the fact that the Texians had managed to maintain the square against the three charges, and he was also impressed with the Texian weapon fire. Dr. Joseph H. Barnard, a Texian, recorded that by sunset seven Texians had been killed. He also recorded that sixty Texians, including Fannin, had been wounded. Forty of the sixty had been wounded several times.
After sunset, Urrea ordered Mexican sharpshooters to be positioned in the tall grass around the square, and that they fire at the Texians. Before Texian sharpshooters were able to remove the threat posed by the Mexican sharpshooters, by firing at the flash caused by the Mexican guns, the Mexican sharpshooters were able to inflict more Texian casualties. As a result of all the fighting that occurred on 19 March, the Texians had suffered at least ten dead and sixty wounded, whilst the Mexicans suffered an unspecified high amount of casualties. The fighting of 19 March had not demoralised the Texian soldiers. They were encouraged by the thought that Horton would succeed in getting Texian reinforcements from Guadalupe Victoria to Fannin. However, Horton had not been able to break through the Mexican defences. During the day's fighting the Texian soldiers that were retreating to Guadalupe Victoria after the earlier
battle of Refugio were close enough to Fannin to hear gunfire. However, they were exhausted and hungry, and did not move to the square. Urrea stationed three detachments of Mexican troops around the square, to prevent the Texians in the square from escaping, and during the night Mexican falsebugle call s were sounded to keep the Texians alert.The Texians' lack of water, and the inability to light fires in the square, meant the wounded Texians could not be treated. The pain being experienced by the wounded resulted in the general decrease in morale amongst the Texian soldiers during the night. The poor weather during the night further lessened the morale of the soldiers. The lack of water also meant that the artillery could not be used effectively the next day, because water was needed to cool and clean the cannons. The fighting of 19 March had also left many Texian artillerists casualties, and ammunition for the cannons was low. All these factors contributed to the conclusion by Fannin and other officers during the night that they could not sustain another day of fighting. An idea for the Texians to escape to a more defendable position under cover of darkness, before Urrea received reinforcements, was rejected because it was decided that those who were too injured to escape, which included friends and relatives of unwounded Texians, should not be left behind. It was therefore decided that the Texians should attempt to make another stand from their current position the next day. As a result, during the night, the Texians dug trenches and erected barricades of carts and dead animals. Urrea, meanwhile, had been reinforced with munitions, fresh troops, and two or three artillery pieces from
Goliad . He positioned the Mexican artillery on the slopes overlooking the Texian square.At 06:15 on March 20, the Mexicans were grouped for battle. After one or two rounds were fired by Mexican artillery Fannin and his officers re-iterated their conclusion that the Texians could not take another day's fighting, and decided to seek honourable terms for surrender. They drafted terms of surrender, which included statements that the Texian wounded would be treated, that they would be gain all the protection expected as
prisoners of war , and that they would be paroled to theUnited States of America . However, Santa Anna had stated earlier that any Texian can only be allowed to surrender unconditionally. As a result, Urrea could not guarantee that all the terms would be followed by Santa Anna. He stated that he would talk to Santa Anna on behalf of the terms of surrender presented by the Texians. The document of surrender was signed by Benjamin C. Wallace, Joseph M. Chadwick, and Fannin. As a result of the signing, the battle of Coleto ended.Aftermath
Those Texians that could walk were sent to
Goliad , under Mexican escort. It would take until aboutMay 23 until those Texians that could not walk were transported to Goliad. During that time, Texian physicians were told that wounded Mexicans were a priority to treat, as opposed to the wounded Texians. Fannin arrived in Goliad onMay 22 . Urrea, meanwhile, had moved onto Guadalupe Victoria, from where he wrote to Santa Anna a letter recommending that the Texian prisoners should be treated withclemency . However, Santa Anna did not follow Urrea's recommendation, instead ordering the Mexican commander at Goliad to execute the Texian prisoners. OnMarch 27 1836, Fannin and the other Texian prisoners were shot by Mexican soldiers. The execution became known as theGoliad Massacre .The Battle of Coleto was significant because it showed that Texian troops involved in the battle, despite being relatively untrained, were able to stand up to the Mexican troops against them and obey their commanders. The battle was primarily lost because Fannin did not act decisively enough to ensure success and he underestimated the quality of the Mexican force against him. It also illustrated that Fannin was reluctant to co-ordinate his actions with other Texian forces, a trait that was common amongst many Texian commanders.
Footnotes
References
*Huffines, Alan C. (2005), "The Texas War of Independence 1835-1836: From Outbreak to the Alamo to San Jacinto",
Oxford :Osprey Publishing , ISBN 1-84176-522-8
*Citation|title=Myths, Misdeeds, and Misunderstandings: The Roots of Conflict in U.S.–Mexican Relations|editor-last=Rodriguez O.|editor-first=Jaime E.|editor2-last=Vincent|editor2-first=Kathryn|location=Wilmington, DE |date=1997|publisher=Scholarly Resources Inc.|isbn=0842026622|contribution=The Colonization and Independence of Texas: A Tejano Perspective|last=de la Teja|first=Jesus F.ee also
*
List of Texas Revolution battles
*Timeline of the Texas Revolution External links
*
* [http://www.tamu.edu/ccbn/dewitt/goliadframe.htm Fannin's Fight & The Massacre at La Bahia (Goliad)] – The Sons of DeWitt Colony
* [http://www.tsl.state.tx.us/treasures/republic/goliad/boyles.html The Battle of Coleto and the Goliad Massacre] – Texas State Library
* [http://www.presidiolabahia.org/coleto.htm Battle of Coleto] – Presidio La Bahia
* [http://www.angelofgoliadhp.com/about_francisca_alvarez.htm The Angel of Goliad]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.