Gambling for resurrection

Gambling for resurrection is a situation in international relations when a leader weakened domestically is willing to risk war or prolong war to maintain office.

Theory

Leaders weakened domestically often undertake risky policies under the expectation that personally undesirable developments will take place should the country's situation not improve. A diversionary war is one example of gambling for resurrection. The fear of removal from office due to either poor performance or bad luck may prompt a leader to instigate a war he or she might not rationally have started in the hope that should by some chance it does go well he or she would stay in power. Gambling for resurrection can also occur within a preexisting war, where a leader might prolong a war which at the onset seemed rational for the country as a whole but could currently be ended, fearing removal from office or punishment (imprisonment, exile, or death)cite book
last = Goemans
first = H. E.
authorlink =
title = War and Punishment; The Causes of War Termination and the First World War
publisher = Princeton University Press
series =
year = 2000
doi =
isbn = ] . The leader thus continues the war against the country's interest, adopting risky military strategies in the hope of a dramatic reversal of fortune in the war's outcome.cite book
last = Downs
first = George W.
authorlink =
coauthors = David M. Rocke
title = Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations
publisher = Princeton University Press
series =
year = 1995
doi =
isbn = ] In this situation, escalation is more attractive than peace because the losses are below the removal threshold for the leader's constituency. Once the constituency seem determined to remove the leader from office, it has no other sanction to apply to the leader. The executive, then, has nothing to risk in further escalation, but may win his right to stay in office should the gamble be successful.cite journal
last = Downs
first = George W.
coauthors = David M. Rocke
year = 1994
month = May
title = Conflict, Agency, and Gambling for Resurrection: The Principal-Agent Problem Goes to War
journal = American Journal of Political Science
volume = 38
issue = 2
pages = 362–380
issn = 0092-5853
url = http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0092-5853(199405)38%3A2%3C362%3ACAAGFR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-4
language = English
format = Text
accessdate = 2007-04-02
doi = 10.2307/2111408 ]

Examples

It is seldom possible to provide conclusive proof that a leader's decision to go to war or prolong war is motivated by personal or domestic political issues. However, some conflicts may be seen as Gambles for Resurrection, including:

* The Argentinian invasion of the Falkland/Malvinas Islands, which was seen as a distraction from President Leopoldo Galtieri's domestic problems, and an attempt to unify the country in its territorial claim over the islands. Ironically, after her victory in the conflict Margaret Thatcher called a Khaki election in the UK, winning decisively, and Galtieri was ousted the same year.

*President Bill Clinton was involved in a sex scandal and started three military strikes in 1998 against Iraq, targets in the Sudan and Afghanistan, and Serbia in the heat of the scandal. This followed just three months after the release of the film "Wag the dog" (see below), and apparently mirrored the film's theme.cite web |last=Bruni|first= Frank| title=Is Life Imitating Art? 'Wag the Dog' Springs to Many Minds |publisher=New York Times|date=1998-08-21|url=http://partners.nytimes.com/library/world/africa/082198attack-wag.html|format= text|accessdate=2007-03-07]

*Adolf Hitler refused to surrender at the end of the Second World War, when defeat was inevitable and surrender was in the best interests of Germany. His suicide may be seen as an attempt to preserve his historical reputation, though his mental state is uncertain.

Pop culture influence

Gambling for resurrection is often referred to in the mainstream media as "Wag the dog," a reference to a 1997 film by the same name in which a fictional President of the United States starts a fake diversionary war to distract the American public from a sex scandal.

References

External links

* [http://www.columbia.edu/~arw2002/WeisigerMidwest.pdf Regime Type and Costly Conflict: A Competing Risks Analysis of Interstate War Duration, Alex Weisiger, Ph.D Candidate Columbia University]