Marjorie Knoller and Robert Noel

Marjorie Fran Knoller (born c. 1956) and Robert Edward Noel (born c. 1942) are attorneys married to each other. They owned a dog that killed Diane Whipple in San Francisco on January 26, 2001. After a trial that attracted international attention, they were sent to prison for involuntary manslaughter. However on August 22, 2008, San Francisco Judge Charlotte Woolard reinstated Knoller's [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/22/BAJC12GPD1.DTL&tsp=1] second degree murder conviction. Knoller was immediately taken into custody. In September of 2008 she was resentenced to serve 15 years to life in prison. [http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93BTVM80&show_article=1]

Biographical sketches

As Knoller was reported to be 46 years old in 2002Van Derbeken, Jaxon. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/03/22/MN139271.DTL Why jury called it murder. Negligence, deception cited in mauling trial.] "San Francisco Chronicle", March 22, 2002.] , she was born c.1956. After attending Brooklyn CollegeCostantinou, Marianne. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/06/10/CM188125.DTL Bad Company: How did two otherwise unremarkable lawyers end up enmeshed in one of the most bizarre and brutal killings San Francisco has seen in recent years?] "San Francisco Chronicle", June 10, 2001.] , Knoller graduated from McGeorge School of Law in Sacramento, California.

As Noel was reported to be 60 years old in 2002, he was born c.1942. He "graduated from the University of Baltimore Law School in 1967."

The two were married in 1989.Jones, Aphrodite. "Red Zone: The Behind-the-Scenes Story of the San Francisco Dog Mauling". New York: William Morrow, 2003. ISBN 0060537795] ^(p.138) Starting in the mid-1990s, Noel and Knoller ran "their law office... out of a converted closet in their Pacific Heights apartment" in San Francisco.^(p.144)

In 2000, Knoller and Noel "obtained their two Presa Canarios, named Bane and Hera, through their relationship with a pair of Pelican Bay State Prison inmates, Paul 'Cornfed' Schneider (who they had legally adopted as their son) and Dale Bretches, members of the Aryan Brotherhood prison gang." Knoller and Noel had first met Schneider at a trial.^(p.148) Bane was male and Hera female; by January 2001, "Bane weighed 140 pounds and Hera close to 100 pounds."Lockyer, Bill, et al. [http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/sfdogattack/caknoller41103cabrf.pdf Appellant’s Opening Brief.] In the Court of Appeal of the State of California / First Appellate District, Division Two. The People of the State of California, Plaintiff and Appellant, V. Marjorie F. Knoller, Defendant and Respondent. San Francisco County Superior Court No. 18181301, The Honorable James L. Warren, Judge. April 11, 2003.]

Events of January 26, 2001

Although because of his larger size Noel "usually handled Bane," Knoller "was home alone with the dogs" on January 26, 2001, and "Bane had to go out," so "she decided to take Bane up to the roof, just one flight up the stairs." Diane Whipple was "returning from a trip to the grocery store" when Bane and possibly Hera attacked her in the hallway. (Hera's "role in the mauling has never been firmly established." There was "no way to prove or disprove" that Hera participated in the attack on Whipple; however, "Hera had parts of Diane [Whipple] 's clothes in her feces," and "experts and authorities speculated that the bites on Whipple's inner thighs had most probably come from Hera."^(pp.277-278).)

The dog(s) caused "77 wounds" to Whipple, with "only her scalp and feet escap [ing] harm."Chmielewski, Dawn C. Tragic Accident or Criminal Act? - Mauling Trial Lawyers Clash in Final Arguments. Heavily Watched, Emotion-Charged Case Against S.F. Couple Goes to Jury Today. "San Jose Mercury News", March 19, 2002.] Whipple died at San Francisco General Hospital; the cause of death was "loss of blood from multiple traumatic injuries (dog bite wounds)."^(pp.10,28)

Aftermath

Bane "was destroyed immediately after the attack"; Hera was seized and destroyed in January 2002.

On January 29, 2001, "Knoller and Noel formally adopt [ed] Schneider, who [was] serving a life sentence for aggravated assault and attempted murder." It was reported that "even their relatives [were] at a loss to understand" the adoption.

In March 2001, a grand jury indicted Knoller and Noel.Chiu, Alexis. Grand Jury Indicts Two in Fatal S.F. Dog Mauling. 2nd-Degree Murder, Manslaughter Among Charges Husband, Wife Face. "San Jose Mercury News", March 28, 2001.] Knoller was indicted for second-degree murder and involuntary manslaughter, Noel was indicted for involuntary manslaughter, and "both also face [d] felony charges of keeping a mischievous dog."

The trial by jury, which began in January 2002, "was moved to Los Angeles because of extensive publicity in the Bay Area."Chmielewski, Dawn C. Testimony Is Challenged - The Prosecutor Disputes Details from Marjorie Knoller, Saying She has Been Inconsistent in Her Accounts in Court and to the S.F. Grand Jury About Efforts to Save Diane Whipple. "San Jose Mercury News", March 13, 2002.] Among other aspects, the trial was notable for:
* The participation of Kimberly Guilfoyle as "second chair" to lead prosecutor James Hammer.^(p.211)
* Opening arguments by Knoller's defense attorney Nedra Ruiz in which she "kicked the jury box, yelled and got down on her hands and knees to re-enact what she described as Knoller's attempts to protect Whipple from the dog attack."Van Derbeken, Jaxon. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2002/04/10/BA161543.DTL Knoller picks new attorney for appeal. Flamboyant trial lawyer Ruiz replaced by veteran Riordan.] "San Francisco Chronicle", April 10, 2002.]
* Knoller's testimony, which included claims that she "attempt [ed] to protect Whipple," that "she... kicked on a neighbor's door for help," and that "12 of 13 incidents recounted by earlier witnesses of attacks by the couple's dogs" had not occurred. Prosecutor Hammer attempted "to puncture holes" in this testimony.
* "National and international press" coverage (e.g., in "Japan, England, and Australia"), with a "media circus" atmosphere, and a "flood" of talk in Internet chat rooms about the case.^{(pp.287-289,293)}

The jury convicted Knoller and Noel on all counts in March 2002. Knoller became "the first person ever to be convicted of murder in a dog-mauling case in California." Jurors interviewed after the trial said that Knoller's testimony was "not believable."

In April 2002, Knoller replaced her attorney Nedra Ruiz with attorney Dennis Riordan.Van Derbeken, Jaxon. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/06/18/MN142223.DTL Dog-maul verdict reversal a 'travesty,' prosecutor says. Knoller escapes second-degree murder conviction.] "San Francisco Chronicle", June 18, 2002.] A San Francisco Superior Court judge, in a June 2002 ruling, overturned Knoller's second-degree murder conviction because he could not "say, as a matter of law, that her [Knoller's] conduct was such that she subjectively knew on Jan. 26 that a human being was likely to die." Prosecutor Hammer called the decision a "travesty."^(p.307)

Noel was sentenced in June 2002 "to the four-year maximum term" for involuntary manslaughter. He was sent to Deuel Vocational Institution but was later moved to Oregon because of "concerns that his having represented inmates and prison guards in California might jeopardize his safety."Zamora, Jim Herron. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/01/01/BAGBD423DJ1.DTL Knoller likely to be freed from prison. Parole may begin today in dog-maul case.] "San Francisco Chronicle", January 1, 2004.]

Knoller was sentenced in July 2002 to four years in prison for involuntary manslaughter and "was transferred within hours" to Valley State Prison for Women (VSPW). [Webby, Sean. Judge Sentences S.F. Woman to 4 Years for Fatal Mauling - Maximum Term for Neighbor's Death. "San Jose Mercury News", July 16, 2002.] In September 2003 Knoller was "still serving her time" at VSPW when Noel was sent from Oregon to High Desert State Prison and then paroled to Solano County.Matier, Phillip, and Andrew Ross. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/09/10/BA295078.DTL Robert Noel, of killer-dog case fame, to get out of prison. Former attorney will serve 2-year parole in Solano County.] "San Francisco Chronicle", September 10, 2003.]

During her time at VSPW, Knoller "refused to work." [ Curtis, Kim. Owner of Killer Dog to be Released - Served About Half of Four-Year Term. "San Jose Mercury News", September 11, 2003.] The January 1, 2004, "Los Angeles Times" stated that Knoller served all "16 months of [her] four-year sentence" at VSPW, which "is typical for inmates who avoid trouble in prison and receive credit for time served in jail before sentencing." [Malnic, Eric. Owner of Killer Dogs to Go Free; The woman convicted in the fatal S.F. mauling will be paroled to the Southland. Her husband was paroled to Northern California. "Los Angeles Times", January 1, 2004.] The January 1, 2004, "San Francisco Chronicle" stated that Knoller was to be released from VSPW to "serve three years' parole somewhere in Southern California." According to newspaper reports on January 3, 2004, however, Knoller was actually released from Central California Women's Facility on January 1, 2004, and sent to Ventura County on parole. [Parrilla, Leslie Parolee in fatal dog-mauling case moves to Ventura County. "Ventura County Star", January 3, 2004.] [Cavanaugh, Andrea. Parolee's Plans Unknown - San Francisco Woman Convicted in Dog Mauling Sent to Ventura County. "Daily News of Los Angeles", January 3, 2004.] Booth, Claire. Knoller Paroled In Dog-Mauling Death - Sent To Southern California, She Must Find A Job But Can't Practice Law. "Contra Costa Times", January 3, 2004.] [Associated Press. Woman imprisoned in dog mauling case is released. "Daily Breeze" (Torrance, CA), January 3, 2004.]

The terms of Knoller's and Noel's paroles included:
* Not contacting Schneider.Goodyear, Charlie. Fairfield reluctant host for parolee. Killer-dog case figure to live there. "San Francisco Chronicle", September 13, 2003.]
* Not owning dogs.
* Not contacting each other. [Cason, Colleen. Ex-con lives a dog's life. "Ventura County Star", January 9, 2004.]

The office of California Attorney General Bill Lockyer had filed an April 2003 appeal of the Superior Court's June 2002 overturning of Knoller's second-degree murder conviction. In May 2005 the California 1st District Court of Appeal reinstated the jury's verdict of second-degree murder; Knoller's attorney Dennis Riordan said he would appeal the Court of Appeal's decision. [Egelko, Bob. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/05/06/BAGC8CL3OM1.DTL Jury's verdict reinstated in dog mauling. State appeals court overrules judge who reduced conviction.] "San Francisco Chronicle", May 6, 2005.]

After Knoller's and Noel's convictions in 2002, the State Bar of California had suspended their law licenses.Lagos, Marisa. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/07/BAGCBP4BR31.DTL Couple convicted in dog mauling lose licenses to practice law.] "San Francisco Chronicle", April 7, 2007.] In April 2007, it was reported that both Knoller and Noel had lost their law licenses. Knoller resigned her license in January 2007 [State Bar of California. [http://members.calbar.ca.gov/search/member_detail.aspx?x=158054 Marjorie Fran Knoller - #158054.] Accessed 2007 Dec 30.] , and Noel was disbarred in February 2007 [State Bar of California. [http://members.calbar.ca.gov/search/member_detail.aspx?x=68477 Robert Edward Noel - #68477.] Accessed 2007 Dec 30.] .

In May 2007 the Supreme Court of California sent the 2002 case back to the Superior Court "to consider restoring [the] jury's second-degree murder conviction."Egelko, Bob. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/06/01/BAGIPQ5KE51.DTL State's top court OKs dog maul murder charge. Judge ordered to reconsider owner's original conviction.] "San Francisco Chronicle", June 1, 2007.] The California Supreme Court "rejected both the lower-court standards and said Knoller, or any other defendant responsible for unintentional but fatal injuries, can be convicted of murder if they acted with 'conscious disregard of the danger to human life'." [ [http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/sfdogattack/caknoller53107opn.html California Supreme Court Sends Murder Conviction in S.F. Dog Attack Case Back To The Trial Court Using The Correct Test For Implied Malice.] "California v. Marjorie Knoller", May 31, 2007.]

On September 22, 2008, the San Francisco Superior Court re-instated Marjorie Knoller's conviction for second degree murder. [ [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080923/ap_on_re_us/fatal_dog_mauling Woman whose dogs mauled neighbor gets 15 to life] - Yahoo News] [ [http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202424717879 Knoller Gets 15 to Life in Dog-Mauling Case] - law.com] The court sentenced Knoller to serve 15 years to life in state prison, with credit for time served.

References

External links

* [http://news.findlaw.com/legalnews/documents/archive_k.html#sfdogattack FindLaw News Document Archive - Smith v. Knoeller, Noel, et. al ("San Francisco Dog Attack").] Accessed 29 Dec 2007.
* [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1535184/ Marjorie Knoller at the Internet Movie Database.] Accessed 29 Dec 2007.
* [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1535332/ Robert Noel at the Internet Movie Database.] Accessed 29 Dec 2007.
* Barry, David. [http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=89 Descent into Darkness. Two liberal San Francisco attorneys got involved in the Aryan Brotherhood. It cost them their freedom, and their souls.] "Intelligence Report", Southern Poverty Law Center, Summer 2002.