- Witherspoon v. Illinois
SCOTUSCase
Litigants=Witherspoon v. Illinois
ArgueDate=April 24
ArgueYear=1968
DecideDate=June 3
DecideYear=1968
FullName=Witherspoon v. Illinois
USVol=391
USPage=510
Citation=
Prior=
Subsequent=
Holding=
SCOTUS=1967-1969
PerCuriam=yes
Concurrence=
Dissent=
LawsApplied=Ill. Rev. Stat., c. 38 s. 743, U.S. Const. amends. VIII, XIV
Overruled="Gregg v. Georgia ", ussc|428|153|1976 "Witherspoon v. Illinois", 391 U.S. 510 (
1968 ), was a U.S. Supreme Court case where the court was asked to decide whether a statestatute providing the state unlimited challenge for cause ofjuror s who might have any objection to thedeath penalty . The court decided that the statute, in effect, gave too much bias in favor of the prosecution.The Court said, Cquote|Whatever else might be said of capital punishment, it is at least clear that its imposition by a
hanging jury cannot be squared with the Constitution. The State ofIllinois has stacked the deck against the petitioner. To execute this death sentence would deprive him of his life without due process of law.The decision in this case would cause the
Supreme Court of California to order a retrial on the penalty phase in the1972 case of "California v. Anderson ", and when the case was heard for the third time, would find the imposition of the Death Penalty was unconstitutional on the grounds of the penalty being Cruel and Unusual in violation of the State Constitution. The decision would become national in scale when the U.S. Supreme Court also in 1972 ruled in "Furman v. Georgia " that all death penalty cases were in violation of the 8th Amendment's prohibition on Cruel and Unusual punishment.ee also
*
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 391 External links
* [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=391&page=510 Full text opinion from Findlaw.com]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.