- Sault Ste. Marie language resolution
The Sault Ste. Marie language resolution was a government motion passed on
January 29 ,1990 bySault Ste. Marie City Council , the governing body of the city of Sault Ste. Marie,Ontario ,Canada , which resolved that English was the sole working language of city government. The resolution ignited a national controversy which made the city a flashpoint in theMeech Lake Accord debate.The Sault Ste. Marie resolution was not the first of its kind in Ontario, but Sault Ste. Marie was the largest municipality to pass such a resolution and bore the brunt of the controversy.
Background
Sault Ste. Marie was originally founded by French-speaking missionaries in 1623 but had become overwhelmingly English-speaking by the twentieth century.
In response to a French-language education controversy which began in 1987 when a group of francophone families lobbied to have a new French school opened in the city, the Sault Alliance for the Preservation of English Language Rights (SAPELR) was formed and began circulating petitions to have this resolution passed by council. The group worked in concert with the
Alliance for the Preservation of English in Canada (APEC), a lobby group which was concurrently campaigning against the provincial government'sFrench Language Services Act . (See alsoFranco-ontarian .) Although that law dealt only with provincial government services, APEC's strategy was to convince municipalities that they would be required to provide services in French, regardless of cost or benefit, in an attempt to convince the municipalities to pass this type of resolution. As a result of the schooling controversy, the SAPELR petition quickly garnered over 25,000 signatures.The resolution was widely seen as retaliation for Quebec Premier
Robert Bourassa 's move to override the Supreme Court of Canada ruling that declared parts of Bill 101 unconstitutional. Bill 101 had declared French as the only official language of Quebec.Text of the resolution ["Crosswords: Language, Education and Ethnicity in French Ontario", Monica Heller, p. 79]
"Whereas the City of Sault Ste. Marie is composed of many different ethnic groups, languages and cultures;"
"And whereas the City of Sault Ste. Marie has always shown respect for each of these cultures by providing preferential treatment for none;"
"And whereas the City of Sault Ste. Marie has throughout its history had one common working language for all of its written and oral communications, which is English;"
"And whereas the preferred common language of commerce, business, trade, science and normal everyday activities is English;"
"Now therefore be it resolved that the Corportion of the City of Sault Ste. Marie in the interests of maintaining goodwill, harmony and sound and responsible fiscal management continue as it has in the past to accept the use of English as the official language of communication with its citizens and with all levels of government, thereby demonstrating the concept of equality for each ethnic, cultural and language group in its jurisdiction."
"And further resolved in accordance with the Provisions of the Municipal Act of Ontario Part VII and more specifically Section 104a of Said Act the Council of the Corporation of the City of Sault Ste. Marie declares English to be the official language of the said Corporation."
Resolution passes
On
January 27 ,1990 , the city's daily newspaper, the "Sault Star ", reported that council would debate the language resolution two days later. This triggered the attention of the national media, and with reporters from all across Canada in town to cover the debate, the resolution passed council 11-2.Controversy
Many political figures, including
Brian Mulroney ,Jean Chrétien and Ontario premierDavid Peterson , who had strongly condemned Premier Bourassa's use of the notwithstanding clause, expressed their opposition to the city's move. Both Peterson and his successor as premier,Bob Rae , refused to meet with mayorJoe Fratesi on several subsequent occasions, even to discuss unrelated matters.In particular, the resolution was seen as a slap in the face to
Quebec , where it was widely viewed as racist. (OneEnvironment Canada meteorologist sent out a weather report for Sault Ste. Marie in which the forecast called for "a chance of flurries andNazi s", leading to her suspension.) Council defended the resolution, suggesting that Quebec's language laws and its refusal to abide by the Supreme Court ruling also constituted racism.Council was also criticized for seemingly turning its back on the city's own history; although in modern times francophones are only a small percentage of the city's population, the city's history is intimately connected to early
French Canadian missionary andvoyageur exploration of theGreat Lakes area. Some commentators also jokingly suggested that the resolution would require the city to change its name to St. Mary's Falls.Even entertainers weighed in on the controversy; on their 1991 album "Road Apples",
The Tragically Hip criticized the resolution in the song "Born in the Water":Smart as trees in Sault Ste. Marie
I can speak my mother tongue
Passing laws, just because
And singing songs of the English unsung
How could you do it?
How could you even try?
When you were born in the water
And you were raised up in the sky?Aftereffects
Fratesi, who was viewed by Sault Ste. Marie voters throughout the controversy as standing up for the city's interests, was re-elected mayor in a landslide in 1991. He later became embroiled in a
conflict of interest controversy in 1995 when he applied for the job of chief administrative officer of the city, while still sitting as mayor. [cite book|last=Sims|first=Harvey|title=The Best Man for the Job: Joe Fratesi and the Politics of Sault Ste. Marie|year=2001|publisher=ECW Press|location=Toronto|id=ISBN 1-55022-454-9]Quebec Premier Bourassa later passed
Bill 86 , which amended that province's language laws in accordance with the Supreme Court ruling, so the controversy died down.On
June 30 ,1994 , a court ruling struck down the English-only resolution as "ultra vires " the council's authority. On August 9, 1999, a resolution was brought forward under a new city council to strike down the resolution. The city's solicitor advised that the resolution was out of order given that a court had already struck down the resolution. Attempting to do what it could, the council then unanimously passed the following resolution:"Moved by Councillor Derik Brandt"
"Seconded by Councillor Sam Lepore"
"Whereas the "language resolution" was struck down by the courts because it was beyond the City’s authority; and
"Whereas it is not legally possible to rescind a resolution that has already been struck down by the courts;
"Be It Resolved that a notation be added to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of City Council of January 29, 1990 to include the following beside item 5(e); N.B. "This resolution was struck down by the courts on June 30, 1994 and therefore has no effect."The effect of the resolution was to amend the minutes containing the English-only resolution to note that the resolution had been struck down.
However, as recently as 2007, "The Gazette" in
Montreal referred to the town of Hérouxville, then embroiled in a controversy aroundreasonable accommodation of immigrants, as Quebec's "own Sault Ste. Marie". [Don MacPherson, [http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=d6859802-d798-46c5-81ae-4710aec5d7a4&p=1 "The town of Herouxville is our own Sault Ste. Marie"] , "The Gazette",January 30 ,2007 .]References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.