Boll Weevil Eradication Program

Boll Weevil Eradication Program

The Boll Weevil Eradication Program is a program sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) that has sought to eradicate the boll weevil in the cotton-growing areas of the United States. It is one of the world's most successful implementations of integrated pest management. The program has enabled cotton farmers to reduce their use of pesticides by between 40 to 100 percent, and increase their yields by at least 10%, since its inception in the 1970s. The USDA estimated in 2006 that nationwide eradication of the boll weevil was expected by 2009. [ [http://www.aphis.usda.gov/publications/plant_health/content/printable_version/fsbollweevil.pdf USDA – Boll Weevil Eradication] ]

History

Since its migration from Mexico in the late 19th century, the boll weevil had been the single most destructive cotton pest in the US, and possibly the most destructive agricultural pest in the US. The cost of its crop depredations has been estimated at $300 million per year. [ [http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-14987730.html Boll weevil economic impacts] ] The control measures used have included a wide range of pesticides, including calcium arsenate, DDT, toxaphene, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, malathion, and parathion. In 1958, the National Cotton Council garnered the Congressional support to create the USDA Boll Weevil Research Lab.

In 1959 J. R. Brazzel and L. D. Newsom published a paper outlining the winter dormancy (diapause) behavior of the boll weevil . Brazzel published the results of his first diapause control insecticide treatment trial in 1959, finding that methyl parathion treatments in the fall significantly reduced the overwintering population, especially when combined with plowing of the stalks into the ground. More sophisticated trapping and monitoring devices were developed over the next decade. Further progress was made when the male boll weevil pheromone was identified in the 1960s; the insects could be lured into traps baited with this pheromone, further reducing their reproduction, and enhancing the monitoring system.

The first full-scale eradication trial began in 1978 in southern Virginia and northern North Carolina. After its initial success, the USDA's APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service) agency established an eradication plan. The cost of the program would be borne both by APHIS (30%) and by the producer (70%). Since the weevil can travel long distances in a short period of time, it was important to implement the program on a regional basis. Expansion of the program usually required cotton producers within the area of proposed expansion to pass a referendum with at least a two-thirds majority. Some states passed legislation to help growers pay their share of program costs.

The program was extended into the southeast and southwest during the 1980s. It is now operational in large portions of Mississippi, Tennessee, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas, as well as in northern Mexico. The states of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Kansas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California have effectively eliminated the weevil problem.

Operation

USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) provides technical support and limitedFederal funds. The state departments of agriculture provide regulatory support, and USDA’sCooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Services help in disseminating program information.

Three main techniques are employed over a 3- to 5-year period: pheromone traps for detection, cultural practices to reduce the weevil’s food supply, and malathion treatments. During the first year, applications of malathion are made every five to seven days starting in late summer. The frequency is reduced to every 10 days during the later part of the growing season until the first frost. The cotton stalks are shredded and plowed into the ground to eliminate their use as a winter shelter. During years 2 through 5, the automatic spraying is supplemented by an intensive trapping program (one trap per 1-2 acres), and malathion applications are made only in those fields where weevils are detected. This phase begins in late spring and continues until the first killing frost. The final phase of the program involves monitoring and trapping at a density of one trap per 10 acres, with spot spraying as required. The program has become more high-tech in recent years, employing GPS mapping technology and bar code readers that transmit trap data electronically.

In portions of its range, the program has been bolstered by the spread of the red imported fire ant, which attacks the larvae and pupae of the boll weevil. [ [http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/op/azinphos/bead_Cotton1.pdf US EPA - Cotton pesticide considerations] ]

Impacts

At one time, cotton growers applied more than 41 percent of all insecticides in agricultural use; they regularly sprayed their cotton as many as 15 times a season. In contrast, under this program, only two applications are made by the third year, and this number may be reduced to nearly zero when the nationwide program is completed. The benefit-cost ratio is estimated by the USDA at 12:1, and the research that built the program will be used in other projects. The program may be used as a model for control of the sea lamprey infestation of the Great Lakes. [ [http://www.glsc.usgs.gov/publications.php?action=2003&abstract=1218%20(OP) Boll weevil eradication: a model for sea lamprey control? Journal of Great Lakes Research 2003] ]

The ecological benefits of the program are manifold; in addition to reducing pesticide use in the US, the fumigation of exported US cotton bales with methyl bromide has also been significantly reduced. Fewer pesticide applications enable other insects to survive, including those which naturally prey on the boll weevil.

References

In-line

External

* [http://www.aphis.usda.gov/publications/plant_health/content/printable_version/fsbollweevil.pdf USDA Program definition]
* [http://www.state.tn.us/agriculture/bollweevil/index.html Program in Tennessee]
* [http://www.cotton.org/tech/pest/bollweevil/ The US National Cotton Council]
* [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:S.2732: Boll Weevil Eradication Equity Act - 106th Congress - Program funding]
* [http://pubs.caes.uga.edu/caespubs/pubs/PDF/RB428.pdf Program in Georgia]
* [http://ceris.purdue.edu/napis/pests/bw/facts.txt Program history]
* [http://www.uni-hamburg.de/Wiss/FB/15/Sustainability/schneider/papers/bw_paper.pdf Program economic impacts]

External links

* [http://www.kfmb.com/stories/story.80583.html Boll weevil eradicated in Arkansas]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Boll weevil — For other uses, see Boll weevil (disambiguation). Boll Weevil Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia …   Wikipedia

  • Cotton — For other uses, see Cotton (disambiguation). Cotton Hi …   Wikipedia

  • Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food, and Forestry — Official logo of the Department Agency overview Formed November 16, 1907 …   Wikipedia

  • List of Oklahoma state agencies — This is an incomplete list of Oklahoma state agencies. The state agencies make up the machinery of government for the state. All agencies are within one of the three branches of the government of Oklahoma. Executive branch agencies are organized… …   Wikipedia

  • Maurice Lukefahr — Maurice James Lukefahr, a pioneer researcher in the fields of host plant resistance and environmental control of cotton insect pests, died in Elsa, Texas in 2002.[1] Contents 1 Early career 2 Host Plant Resistance 3 …   Wikipedia

  • Red imported fire ant — Taxobox name = Red imported fire ant regnum = Animalia phylum = Arthropoda classis = Insecta ordo = Hymenoptera familia = Formicidae tribus = Solenopsidini genus = Solenopsis species = S. invicta binomial = Solenopsis invicta binomial authority …   Wikipedia

  • Mating disruption — (MD) is a pest management technique designed to control certain insect infestations. Specifically, mating disruption involves the use of synthesized sex pheromones to disrupt the reproductive cycle of insects. Contents 1 Mechanism 2 Advantages of …   Wikipedia

  • Agriculture in Haiti — Agriculture continued to be the mainstay of the economy of Haiti in the late 1980s; it employed approximately 66 percent of the labor force and accounted for about 35 percent of GDP and for 24 percent of exports in 1987 (see fig. 14). The role of …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”