Silent Spring

Infobox Book
name = Silent Spring
title_orig =
translator =


image_caption = The Book-of-the-Month Club edition, with included endorsement by William O. Douglas
author = Rachel Carson
cover_artist =
country = United States
language = English
series =
subject = Environmentalism
genre =
publisher = Houghton Mifflin
release_date = September 1962
media_type = Hardcover/paperback
pages =
isbn =
preceded_by =
followed_by =

"Silent Spring" is a book written by Rachel Carson and published by Houghton Mifflin in September 1962. The book is widely credited with helping launch the environmental movement. [Josie Glausiusz. (2007), Better Planet: Can A Maligned Pesticide Save Lives? "Discover Magazine". Page 34.]

When "Silent Spring" was published, Rachel Carson was already a well-known writer on natural history, but had not previously been a social critic. The book was widely read (especially after its selection by the Book-of-the-Month Club and an endorsement by Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas), spending several weeks on the "New York Times" best-seller list, and inspired widespread public concerns with pesticides and pollution of the environment. "Silent Spring" facilitated the ban of the pesticide DDT [ [http://iaspub.epa.gov/trs/trs_proc_qry.navigate_term?p_term_id=6719&p_term_cd=TERM EPA reference: DDT] . Retrieved 2007-11-04.] in 1972 in the United States.

The book documented detrimental effects of pesticides on the environment, particularly on birds. Carson said that DDT had been found to cause thinner egg shells and result in reproductive problems and death. She also accused the chemical industry of spreading disinformation, and public officials of accepting industry claims uncritically.

"Silent Spring" has made many lists of the best nonfiction books of the twentieth century. In the Modern Library List of Best 20th-Century Nonfiction it was at #5, and it was at #78 in the conservative National Review. [ [http://www.nationalreview.com/100best/100_books.html The 100 Best Non-Fiction Books of the Century] . National Review. Retrieved on 2007-11-04.] Most recently, Silent Spring was named one of the 25 greatest science books of all time by the editors of "Discover Magazine". [ [http://discovermagazine.com/2006/dec/25-greatest-science-books/article_view?b_start:int=1&page=2 "25 Greatest Science Books of All Time"] . "Discover Magazine", Retrieved on 2007-11-04.]

A follow-up book, "Beyond Silent Spring", [ [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v8n68q671283064r "Beyond Silent Spring: Integrated Pest Management and Chemical Safety. Edited by H.F. van Emden and D.B. Peakall"] . SpringerLink. Retrieved on 2007-11-04.] co-authored by H.F. van Emden and David Peakall, was published in 1986.

Thesis

The book stated that uncontrolled pesticide use led to the deaths of animals and especially birds, but also humans. Its title was meant to evoke a spring season in which no bird songs could be heard, because they had all died from pesticides. Its title was inspired by a poem by John Keats, "", which contained the lines "The sedge is wither'd from the lake, And no birds sing." [Peter A. Coates. (October 2005), [http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/eh/10.4/coates.html "The Strange Stillness of the Past: Toward an Environmental History of Sound and Noise"] . "Environmental History", Volume 10, Issue 4. Retrieved on 2007-11-04. ]

Support

History professor Gary Kroll commented, "Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" played a large role in articulating ecology as a 'subversive subject'— as a perspective that cut against the grain of materialism, scientism, and the technologically engineered control of nature." [Gary Kroll, [http://onlineethics.org/CMS/profpractice/exempindex/carsonindex/kroll.aspx "Rachel Carson-"Silent Spring"] : A Brief History of Ecology as a Subversive Subject". Onlineethics.org: National Academy of Engineering. Retrieved 2007-11-04.]

According to "Time" magazine in 1999, within a year or so of its publication, "all but the most self-serving of Carson's attackers were backing rapidly toward safer ground. In their ugly campaign to reduce a brave scientist's protest to a matter of public relations, the chemical interests had only increased public awareness."

Carson had made it clear she was not advocating the banning or complete withdrawal of helpful pesticides, but was instead encouraging responsible and carefully managed use, with an awareness of the chemicals' impact on the entire ecosystem. However, some critics asserted that she was calling for the elimination of all pesticides. [Murphy, Priscilla Coit. "What a Book Can Do: The Publication and Reception of Silent Spring". Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2005. ISBN 978-1-55849-582-1]

In response to the publication of "Silent Spring" and the uproar that ensued, U.S. President John F. Kennedy directed his Science Advisory Committee to investigate the Carson's claims. Their investigation "vindicated" Carson's work, and lead to an immediate strengthening of the regulation of chemical pesticides. [ [http://audubonmagazine.org/books/editorchoice0709.html Audubon Magazine ] ] [ [http://www.nrdc.org/health/pesticides/hcarson.asp NRDC: The Story of Silent Spring ] ]

Criticism

Even before Silent Spring was published by Houghton Mifflin in 1962, there was strong opposition to it. According to "Time" in 1999:

Carson was violently assailed by threats of lawsuits and derision, including suggestions that this meticulous scientist was a "hysterical woman" unqualified to write such a book. A huge counterattack was organized and led by Monsanto, Velsicol, American Cyanamid — indeed, the whole chemical industry — duly supported by the Agriculture Department as well as the more cautious in the media.

In the 1960s, biochemist and former chemical industry spokesman Robert White-Stevens stated, "If man were to follow the teachings of Miss Carson, we would return to the Dark Ages, and the insects and diseases and vermin would once again inherit the earth." [Dorothy McLaughlin. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/nature/disrupt/sspring.html "Fooling with Nature: "Silent Spring" Revisited"] . PBS Frontline. Retrieved 2007-11-04. ]

Industry and agribusiness advocates continue to criticize "Silent Spring". In a 2005 essay, "The Harm That Pressure Groups Can Do", British politician Dick Taverne was damning in his criticism of Carson:

Carson didn't seem to take into account the vital role (DDT) played in controlling the transmission of malaria by killing the mosquitoes that carry the parasite (...) It is the single most effective agent ever developed for saving human life (...) Rachel Carson is a warning to us all of the dangers of neglecting the evidence-based approach and the need to weight potential risk against benefit: it can be argued that the anti-DDT campaign she inspired was responsible for almost as many deaths as some of the worst dictators of the last century. [Taverne, Dick "The Harm That Pressure Groups Can Do", collected in "Panic Nation", 2005, edited by Stanley Feldman and Vincent Marks, ISBN 1-84454-122-3.]

However, DDT has never been banned for anti-malaria use, [ [http://www.pops.int/ Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants(POPs) ] ] and Carson argued in "Silent Spring" that:

No responsible person contends that insect-borne disease should be ignored. The question that has now urgently presented itself is whether it is either wise or responsible to attack the problem by methods that are rapidly making it worse. The world has heard much of the triumphant war against disease through the control of insect vectors of infection, but it has heard little of the other side of the story—the defeats, the short-lived triumphs that now strongly support the alarming view that the insect enemy has been made actually stronger by our efforts. Even worse, we may have destroyed our very means of fighting. ...

What is the measure of this setback? The list of resistant species now includes practically all of the insect groups of medical importance. ... Malaria programmes are threatened by resistance among mosquitoes. ...

Practical advice should be 'Spray as little as you possibly can' rather than 'Spray to the limit of your capacity' ..., Pressure on the pest population should always be as slight as possible.

In the 2000s, Carson and "Silent Spring" have come under increasing attack from authors who argue that restrictions placed on DDT have caused needless death, and more generally that environmental regulation unnecessarily restricts economic freedom. [Lytle, Mark Hamilton. "The Gentle Subversive: Rachel Carson, Silent Spring, and the Rise of the Environmental Movement". New York: Oxford University Press, 2007 ISBN 0-19-517246-9] Examples of recent criticism include:
(a) Rich Karlgaard, " [http://blogs.forbes.com/digitalrules/2007/05/but_her_heart_w.html But Her Heart Was Good] ", Forbes.com, May 18, 2007. Accessed September 23, 2007.
(b) Keith Lockitch, " [http://capmag.com/article.asp?ID=4965 Rachel Carson's Genocide] ", "Capitalism Magazine", May 23, 2007. Accessed May 24, 2007
(c) Paul Driessen, " [http://www.washingtontimes.com/commentary/20070428-100957-5274r.htm Forty Years of Perverse 'Responsibility,'] ", "The Washington Times", April 29, 2007. Accessed May 30, 2007.
(d) Iain Murray, " [http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MjhkYTlmYjljMmJlMzU5Y2IxOGM3ZWM3YzZkNzFiNGE "Silent" Alarmism: A Centennial We Could Do Without] ", "National Review", May 31, 2007. Accessed May 31, 2007.] For example, the conservative magazine "Human Events" gave "Silent Spring" an "honorable mention" in its list of the "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries," [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries] , accessed August 24, 2007] and in 2002, to mark its 40 anniversary, Reason Magazine published an essay by economist Ronald Bailey, a former fellow with the libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute. [ [http://www.reason.org/bailey.shtml "Ron Bailey bio"] ] Bailey argued that the book had a mixed legacy:

The book did point to problems that had not been adequately addressed, such as the effects of DDT on some wildlife. And given the state of the science at the time she wrote, one might even make the case that Carson's concerns about the effects of synthetic chemicals on human health were not completely unwarranted. Along with other researchers, she was simply ignorant of the facts. But after four decades in which tens of billions of dollars have been wasted chasing imaginary risks without measurably improving American health, her intellectual descendants don't have the same excuse. [ [http://www.reason.com/news/show/34823.html "Silent Spring at 40"] , Ronald Bailey, "Reason", June 12, 2002]

Some environmentalists consider this latter day criticism of "Silent Spring" and Rachel Carson and concomitant push for DDT to be an industry sponsored strategy to discredit the environmental movement. [ [http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3186 "Rachel Carson, Mass Murderer?: The creation of an anti-environmental myth."] Aaron Swartz, "Extra!", September/October, 2007] [ [http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/06/29/rachel_carson/ "Rachel Carson's Birthday Bashing"] , Kirsten Weir, [http://www.salon.com Salon.com] , June 29, 2007.] [David Roberts, " [http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/5/23/17433/0674 My one and only post on the Rachel Carson nonsense] " Grist.com, May 24, 2007. Accessed September 23, 2007.] [In this context, some draw attention to the fact that both the Reason Foundation and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, both criticial of "Silent Spring", have received substantial funding from corporations in regulated industries. ( [http://www.ewg.org/node/7978?title=George W. Bush's Anti-Environmental Advisors] , [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/23/AR2006052301305.html?title=The Tempest] ).] For example, Monica Moore of Pesticide Action Network has argued that "Renewed promotion of DDT and attacks on those who would limit its use isn’t about malaria, or even DDT. It is a cynical 'better living through chemistry' campaign intended to discredit the environmental health movement, with support from the Bush administration and others who seek nothing less than the dismantling of health and environmental protections." [Monica Moore, " [http://panna.org/magazine/fall2006/index.html First Words] ", "PAN Magazine", Fall 2006. Accessed September 23, 2007] .

ee also

* Bioaccumulation
* Biomagnification
* Our Stolen Future
* Toxins

References

ources

*Carson, Rachel. "Silent Spring" (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962), Mariner Books, 2002, ISBN 0-618-24906-0
**"Silent Spring" initially appeared serialized in three parts in the June 16, June 23, and June 30, 1962 issues of "The New Yorker" magazine
*Graham, Frank. "Since Silent Spring" (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1970), Fawcett 1976 reprint: ISBN 0-449-23141-0
*"Silent Spring Revisited", American Chemical Society, 1986: ISBN 0-317-59798-1, 1987: ISBN 0-8412-0981-2
*Litmans, Brian and Jeff Miller, "Silent Spring Revisited: Pesticide Use And Endangered Species", Diane Publishing Co., 2004, ISBN 0-7567-4439-3 (67 p.)
* Lear, Linda. "Rachel Carson: Witness for Nature." New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1997, Owl Books paperback 1998: ISBN 0-8050-3428-5
* Murphy, Priscilla Coit, "What A Book Can Do: The Publication and Reception of Silent Spring", University of Massachusetts Press, 2005, ISBN 1-55849-476-6
*United States Environmental Protection Agency [http://www.epa.gov/pbt/pubs/ddt.htm "What is DDT?"] retrieved April 26, 2006
* [http://www.nsc.org/library/chemical/ddt.htm 'DDT Chemical Backgrounder', "National Safety Council"] Retrieved May 30 2005
*"Report on Carcinogens", Fifth Edition; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program (1999).

External links

* [http://rcbookclub.blogspot.com/ Rachel Carson Online Book Club]
* [http://www.rachelcarsoncouncil.com/ The Rachel Carson Council]
* [http://www.mindfully.org/Pesticide/Rachel-Carson-Silent-Spring.htm "New York Times" report of chemical industry's campaign] July 22, 1962
* [http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/10/05/reviews/carson-spring.html?_r=1&oref=slogin "New York Times" book review] September 23, 1962
* [http://info-pollution.com/spring.htm Jim Norton, "Silencing "Silent Spring"]
* [http://www.nrdc.org/health/pesticides/hcarson.asp Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC): The Story of Silent Spring] — NRDC
* [http://www.mansionbooks.com/BookDetail.php?bk=210 Photos of the first edition of Silent Spring]