- Paul McHugh
Paul McHugh (b. 1958,
Gisborne ) is aNew Zealand academic lawyer. He teaches at theUniversity of Cambridge where he is a Reader in Law and Fellow ofSidney Sussex College (since 1984). [http://www.landecon.cam.ac.uk/staff/profiles/pmchugh.htm Profile at the University of Cambridge] ] He is the Visiting Ashley McHughNgāi Tahu Professor atVictoria University of Wellington .Education
McHugh graduated LL.B.(Hons I) from
Victoria University of Wellington (1979), LLM (Saskatchewan, 1980), and obtained his PhD at Cambridge with his dissertation "The aboriginal rights of the New Zealand Maori at common law" (which was awarded a Yorke Prize in 1988).Career
McHugh's work has primarily been in the field of common-law aboriginal rights, a topic on which he has published extensively. His work on the doctrine of aboriginal title in New Zealand argued that there remained unextinguished
Māori rights around the coastline. The High Court accepted and cited his work in the Te Weehi case (1986), leading to a series of cases in which New Zealand courts applied Māori customary law, recognising it as the basis for Māori rights and exemption from the regulatory regime of the Fisheries Act 1988. In 1991 McHugh published the Māori Magna Carta, which for the first time explained and analysed the range of laws specifically affecting the Māori in light of theTreaty of Waitangi .In the 1990s his work began incorporating a comparativist dimension, culminating in the publication in 2004 of "Aboriginal societies and the common law: a history of sovereignty, status and self-determination". ["Indigenous Law Journal" 4, 241–51 (2005)] The book picks up themes of his work in the previous decade, particularly the intellectual influence of
John Pocock (Johns Hopkins University ) and R. A. Sharp (Auckland, writer of "Justice and the Maori" (1990 and 1997)). In particular McHugh argues for the historicisation not just oflegal doctrine , but of the notion of law itself, so that the history of the common law's encounter with tribal societies becomes also an expression of the change in the nature and modalities of legal thought. Further, the first half of the book considers the notion of sovereignty and how it developed in the Crown's dealings with non-Christian and tribal peoples from the medieval period. The second half of the book considers the modern history of aboriginal rights, once they had been admitted into what he calls the 'common-law rights-place' as a result of key court judgments. All common-law jurisdictions (Canada in 1973; theUnited States in 1978; New Zealand in 1986–91; andAustralia in 1992 and 1996) experienced the impact of major court judgments dramatically reconfiguring state relations with the tribes. Thrust into the rights-place aboriginal peoples have had to develop thelegalism of life inside that habitat. This has presented issues of what McHugh terms 'rights-management' (governance) and '-integration'.In a series of papers from 1995, McHugh began considering the
historiographical properties of legal thought and method and legal process, with Andrew Sharp initiating a debate in New Zealand and Australia that has been continued by other academics and writers such as John Pocock (reproduced in his collection of essays "The discovery of islands" in 2005), W. H. Oliver, Bain Attwood and Giselle Byrnes. The essay collection "Histories Power and Loss" brings this work together, anchored by Pocock's essay.McHugh has also considered the constitutional basis of Crown relations with Māori outside of a claims-centred mode of engagement, a commissioned paper for the NZ Department of Justice published with another, on a similar theme by
Ken Coates as "Aboriginal Identity and Relations in North America and Australasia". [Two major essays, edited by P Sarr and accompanied by short commentaries in "Kokiri Ngatahi: Living Relationships - The Treaty of Waitangi in the New Millennium" (Wellington: Victoria University Press, 1998, pp 107–86).] This paper, with its argument for the recognition of Crown and tribe in ongoing relations from which exit is not possible and finality and closure illusory, influenced the move towards more 'relational' approaches in the public sphere where Māori issues were to be seen in terms of living relationships rather than a sequence of problems to be eliminated. The language of closure and exit that dominatedPākehā (European) discourse of Māori claims was predicated upon an outcome – Māori mergence into a culturally undifferentiated populace – that would never happen and which, in any event, was contrary to the Treaty itself (and, he might have added, the plain demographic pattern which strengthens rather than diminishes Polynesian profile).He has also written of the nature of constitutional memory and its manifestation in the New Zealand setting, ["Tales of constitutional origin and Crown sovereignty in New Zealand" (2002), "University of Toronto Law Journal", 52, 69–99)] as well as argued for a more sophisticated historiography of New Zealand legal history, a 'tradition' that he believes has yet to take root.
In 2004–06 he returned to common law aboriginal title in the wake of the
New Zealand foreshore and seabed controversy when the Court applied common law principles following the arguments pioneered in his published work in the 1980s [See "Aboriginal title in New Zealand courts" (1984), "University of Canterbury Law Review", 2, 235–65; and "The legal status of Maori fishing rights in tidal water" (1984), "Victoria University of Wellington Law Review" 52, 247–7.] He appeared as an independent witness before theWaitangi Tribunal (2004) and the Select Committee hearings (2005) and toured the country (under theaegis of theNew Zealand Law Society ) explaining the legal position. He has also been retained by the Canadian Department of Justice as an independent witness in several major land claims.Family
His mother was Pauline Mary McHugh (died 1991). His father was Ashley George McHugh (died 1999), who became Deputy Chief Judge of the Māori Land Court and later chaired the Waitangi Tribunal's hearing of the Ngāi Tahu Claim (see
Treaty of Waitangi claims and settlements ). As of 2006, hiscivil partner is Andrew Hardwick, a film producer.Notes and references
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.