- 1st Combat Evaluation Group
Infobox Military Unit
unit_name= 1st Combat Evaluation Group
caption= 1st Combat Evaluation Group emblem
dates= 1961-1993?
country=United States
allegiance= United States of America
branch=United States Air Force
type=
role=
size=
command_structure=USAF Group
current_commander=
garrison=Air Force Base
ceremonial_chief=
colonel_of_the_regiment=
nickname=
patron=
motto=
colors=
march=
mascot=
battles=
anniversaries=The
United States Air Force 's 1st Combat Evaluation Group was an evaluation unit located atBarksdale AFB ,Louisiana .History
The 1st Combat Evaluation Group was activated on
1 Aug 1961 atBarksdale AFB ,Louisiana . The 1CEVG brought under one commander the functions of two formerStrategic Air Command (SAC) units, the3908th Strategic Standardization Group and the1st Radar Bomb Scoring Group . Since its inception, the group's mission has been to provide command level standardization/evaluation of SAC aircrews, radar scoring of simulated bombing activity by SAC aircraft and any contingency warfare support required by HeadquartersStrategic Air Command and HeadquartersUnited States Air Force . In 1986, the 1CEVG acquired an additional mission to help address the command's need to emphasize tactical employment of SAC aircraft. The group continued to meet the changing needs of SAC aircrews through standardization/ evaluation, radar bomb scoring, and now, tactics development/employment. The 1CEVG conducted worldwide operations using 13 detachments.Official History
"Source: [http://www.1stcombatevaluationgroup.com/ About us]
RADAR BOMB SCORING HISTORICAL SUMMARY
"'RBS COMES OF AGE "'During
World War II , alliedbomber crews soon discovered thatradar was an indispensable aid forstrategic bombing . The British employed their bomber forces primarily at night. Thus a means of sighting independent of visibility was required. The American forces also required such a system even though they bombed in daylight. The weather in Europe was so consistently bad during the winter months thatstrategic bombing could only be accomplished with a radar system. The British were the pioneers in developing such systems while theindustrial complex of the U.S. refined and improved their initial efforts.When
victory in Europe seemed assured, military efforts focused in the Pacific. Here it became clear that training procedures for radar bombing were in their infant stages and severely lacking. To correct this, staff work began to develop a training system which would improve crew proficiency in radar bombing through better scoring techniques. Under the jurisdiction of the Army Air Force Tactical Center, an experimental station was established inJacksonville, Florida to test the training system. These tests proved the value of radar bomb scoring as a means of improving bombing training. Soon thereafter, theSecond Air Force took actions to establish a radar bomb scoring station atKansas City, Missouri , and later, a scoring detachment atFort Worth, Texas . HQ Second Air Force originally had jurisdiction over this operation but as it grew in size and scope, it became clear that a formal organization was needed to control and manage the new training detachment. This need gave birth to the organization of which you are part now.On
6 June 1945 , the 206th Army Air Force Base Unit (RBS) ( 206th AAFBU), was activated atColorado Springs, Colorado under the command of Colonel Robert W. Burns. He assumed operational control of the twoSCR-584 radar detachments located at Kansas City and Fort Worth, Texas. New detachments were also established atDenver ,Chicago ,Omaha ,Albuquerque , and Los Angeles] . On24 July 1945 , the 206th was redesignated the 63rd AAFBU (RBS) and three weeks later was moved toMitchell Field, New York , and placed under the command of theContinental Air Command . On5 March 1946 , the organization moved back to Colorado Springs and on 8 March of the same year was re-designated the 263rd AAFBU.With the activation of the
8th Air Force the demand for radar bomb scoring training increased greatly. The 263rd was relieved from assignment to15th Air Force and assigned directly to HeadquartersStrategic Air Command . The increase in RBS activity could be seen in the statistics for RBS runs over the years. During 1947 a total of 2,499 runs were scored as compared to 880 runs scored in 1946. During 1948, 12,084 runs were scored. This number increased to 28,049, a tremendous gain over previous years and became a real measure of the effectiveness and popularity of this type training.On
21 July 1948 , the 263rd was redesiganted the 3903rd Radar Bomb Scoring Squadron with an effective date of1 August 1948. On19 January 1951 , this squadron was redesignated the 3903rd Radar Bomb Scoring Group. At this point the Group commanded 12 detachments reporting to three radar bomb scoring squadrons.THE KOREAN CONFLICT
During the
Korean Conflict RBS Detachments provided a service unique in military annals. Three detachments from the 3903rd Radar Bomb Scoring Squadron were used for tactical air support of USAF aircraft in direct action against enemy forces. These detachment provided radar controlled ground direction to aircraft engaged in bombing targets at critical locations. Mobile vans and specially trained crews directedB-26 , C47, B-29, P-80, andF-84 aircraft onall-weather mission s against enemy airfields, troop concentrations, key buildings, and other difficult targets.These units also worked closely with ground forces in
Korea from their arrival the last week in August 1950 to their departure in early October 1951. During the next three years the Group underwent various organizational shuffles, but none to match the activities on 10 August 1954.A NEW NAME, SAME MISSION
On
10 August 1945 , the 3903rd Radar Bomb Scoring Group, its three squadrons, and all detachments were discontinued. Simultaneously, the 1st Radar Bomb Scoring Group was activated. This new organization absorbed all personnel and equipment of the 3903rd. By March 1956 the Group consisted of 28 detachments. The numbers of missions scored increased as the size of the organization grew. For example, in 1956 the Group recordeed 140,919 attacks against sites. Of these some 127,070 were successfully scored.The next several years brought few organizational or other changes to the Group. The personnel assigned continued to provide the Command sophisticated and effective radar bomb scoring training.
On 1 August 1961, a major organizational change came to fruition when the Department of the Air Force activated the 1st Combat Evaluation Group at Barksdale AFB, Louisiana. With this action the 1st Radar Bomb Scoring Group and the 3908th Strategic Evaluation Group were merged into one organization. This new organization then had the dual mission of providing radar bomb scoring services as well as standardization and evaluation services. This is the organization of which you are a part today.
VIETNAM
With the advent of B-52
bombing inSoutheast Asia in 1965, it soon became apparent that a requisite number of suitable offset aiming points were not available.Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara stated: We are faced with very, very heavy jungle in certain portions of South Vietnam, jungle so heavily that is impossible to find a good aiming point in it. We know some of these jungles are used by theVietcong for base camps and for storage areas…. You can imagine that without an ability to find an aiming point, There is only one way of bombing it and that is with a random pattern…With the force we had (B-52s) trained as it was in pattern bombing…the military commanders felt-and I believe this was a proper use of the weapons-that these strikes would destroy certain of the Viet Cong base areas, and, as a matter of fact, they did…There is no other way of doing it. We propose to continue. In October 1965 the Air Force began further modification of its B-52 force to increase the internal loading from 27 to 84 of the 500 or 750-pound bombs. In March 1966 the modified bombs went into operation. Concurrent with the deployment of the modified B-52, the Air Force installed Combat SkySpot; a ground directed bombing system, in South Vietnam. The system employed existing (1CEVG) mobile ground radar control units and permitted Military Assistance Commander Vietnam (MACV) considerably more latitude because the selection of targets would no longer depend on nearby, prominent geographical features; they had only to be within range of Combat SkySpot equipment.Using radar, 1CEVG personnel would direct the bombers along a designated route to a bomb drop point, providing in route corrected headings and speed as needed. Then, at the proper moment, the pilot received a signal to release his bombs. Combat SkySpot not only provided flexibility in targeting, but its accuracy soon surpassed that of the previously used radar synchronous bombing. In time, practically all combat areas of Southeast Asia were within range of one or more of the growing number of Combat SkySpot facilities. Six 1CEVG personnel lost their lives during the construction phase when they were ambushed and killed near
Dong Ha Marine Combat Base while conducting a site location survey. Within 1CEVG headquarters today a memorial room has been established to honor the memory of those lost in combat.The original name for Combat SkySpot was simply SkySpot in 1965. In October of that year the name was changed to Combat Proof. In January 1967 the name was again changed to its final designation, Combat SkySpot.
On
15 August 1973 , with the cessation of bombing in Southeast Asia, the last Combat SkySpot sortie was flown. In the seven years and six months of Combat SkySpot operations, 1CEVG personnel manned ground radar sites on a 24-hour per day basis in such locations asBien Hoa ,Binh Thuy ,Pleiku ,Thuy ,Dalat ,Hue ,Phu Bai ,Son Tray ,Da Nang ,Quang Tri , andDong Ha South Vietnam. In Thailand, the locations included, Nakhon Phanom, Udon Thani, and Ubon Ratchathani.The Combat SkySpot mission was not limited to all-weather weapons delivery however. These sites also directed Commando Vault missions, the deployment of helicopter landing sites zones by releasing 10,000 and
15,000-pound bomb s from C-130 Hercules aircraft in support of ground forces. Further, Combat SkySpot sites aided in search and rescue missions and provided navigation fixes for a variety of aircraft.During the 90-month period of service in Southeast Asia, Combat SkySpot crews directed 75 percent of the B-52 strikes in that conflict. Under Combat SkySpot over 300,000 USAF, Navy and Marine sorties were controlled. Additionally, Combat SkySpot members were responsible for more than 150,000 tactical air strikes.
In August 1966, the Third Air Division gave the 1st Combat Evaluation Group the Top Three Award for their outstanding contribution to the war effort through the Combat SkySpot program.
In 1967, a
top secret U.S. Air Force operation code named "PONY EXPRESS " was undertaken. The operation was to airlift 150 tons of equipment by helicopters to LIMA SITE-85. The equipment was to upgrade the Site's original navigation equipment with a more elaborate system using the latest radar. This equipment would enable American aircraft to bomb North Vietnam and Laos at night, and in all types of weather.Lima Site-85 was destroyed in March of 1968 with eleven U.S. Air Force personnel still listed asMIA /Laos .TODAY
The following years saw few dramatic changes within the Group. The focus of the Group turned to the development and acquisition of the new and improved radar bomb scoring equipment. In 1977, for example, the Multiple Threat Emitter System (MUTES) prototype underwent initial operational evaluation. Efforts to improve TLQ-11 jamming capabilities were underway the following year. In October 1978 the MUTES was officially welcomed into the SAC training program.
Into 1979 Group members continued to work on new equipment with the completion of a prototype study and the advent of conceptual tests for a new radar receiver, the
Threat Reaction Analysis Indicator System (TRAINS). This new radar receiver would analyze how the crews and their equipment reacted to ground-based threats such as air-to-air missile systems. The development of SEEK SCORE, an improved radar scoring system, was also underway.Into the 1980’s the personnel of the 1st Combat Evaluation Group continued to provide the best radar bomb scoring services in existence. This, combined with the development and acquisition of new and sophisticated equipment, plays a major role in the readiness of the Strategic Air Command and the security of the United States.1CEVG became known as the
99 Electronic Combat Range Group (99ECRG) around 1990 - which was subsequently disbanded in 1995.Major Command *
Strategic Air Command (1 Aug 1961 -)Air Division None - reported directly to DCO, SAC Hq., Offutt AFB, Neb.
*1st Strategic Aerospace Division (???-???)Re-designations
* Radar Calibration Det (218 NY) Myitkyina, Burma WWII
* Fighter Control Squadron Philippines WWII
* Radar Bomb Scoring Group (SAC) Carswell AFB, Texas 10 August 1954 - 21 July 1961; CO: Lt Col (then Colonel) Otis Parks [http://www.mobileradar.org/unit_1_75.html#skyspot]
* 1st Combat Evaluation Group (1 Aug 1961 -????)
*99 Electronic Combat Range Group (99ECRG) around 1990 - which was subsequently disbanded in 1995 [http://www.strategic-air-command.com/patches/mystery-solved2.htm]ubordinate Units
*Det 1 - LaJunta,
Colorado
*Det 2 -Holbrook AFS ,Arizona
*Det 3 - Statesboro Georgia
*Det 4 - Bahn, Germany
*Det 4 - Harrison,Arkansas
*Det 5 - Wilder,Idaho
*Det 6 - Bayshore,Michigan
*Det 7 - Ashland,Maine
*Det 8 - Richmond,Kentucky
*Det 9 - Osan AB, ROK
*Det 10 - Hastings, Nebraska
*Det 11 - Watertown,New York
*Det 12 - Hawthorne,Nevada
*Det 14 - Bismarck,North Dakota
*Det 16 - Powell,Wyoming
*Det 17 - Havre,Montana
*Det 18 - Forsyth,Montana
*Det 19 - Dickinson,North Dakota
*Det 20 - Conrad,Montana
*Det 21 - Belle Fourche,South Dakota
*Det 24 -Andersen AFB ,Guam
*Det 25 -Ubon RTAFB ,Thailand Locations
*
Barksdale AFB ,Louisiana (1 Aug 1961 -????)See also
Operation Menu References
* Strategic Air Command. (1988) SAC Unit Mission and History Summaries. Omaha, Nebraska: HQ SAC.
External links
* [http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/CrossTalk/2007/10/0710Jost.pdf ConOps] for evolution of Radar Bomb Scoring System to ground directed radar guided bombing, by Alan C. Jost of
Raytheon . Accessed 2008-08-16
* [http://www.1stcombatevaluationgroup.com 1st Combat Evaluation Group]
* [http://www.zianet.com/jpage/airforce/ Joe's USAF Blue Book]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.