- Savings and loan association
A savings and loan association, also known as a thrift, is a
financial institutionthat specializes in accepting savingsdeposits and making mortgage loans. The term is mainly used in the United States; similar institutions in the United Kingdom, Ireland and some Commonwealth countries include building societiesand trustee savings banks.
They are often mutually held (often called
mutual savings banksfact|date=September 2008), meaning that the depositors and borrowers are members with voting rights, and have the ability to direct the financial and managerial goals of the organization. It is possible for a savings and loan to be a joint stock companyand even publicly traded. This means, however, that it truly no longer is an association and depositors and borrowers no longer have any managerial control.
Early history of the savings and loan association
At the beginning of the 19th century,
bankingwas still something only done by those who had assets or wealththat needed safekeeping. The first savings bank in the United States, the Philadelphia Savings Fund Society, was established on December 20, 1816, and by the 1830s such institutions had become widespread. Savings and loans accepted deposits and used those deposits, along with other capital that was in their possession, to make loans. What was revolutionary was that the management of the savings and loan was determined by those that held deposits and in some instances had loans. The amount of influence in the management of the organization was determined based on the amount on deposit with the institution.
The overriding goal of the savings and loan association was to encourage savings and investment by common people and to give them access to a financial intermediary that otherwise had not been open to them in the past. The savings and loan was also there to provide loans for the purchase of large ticket items, usually homes, for worthy and responsible borrowers. The early savings and loans were in the business of "neighbors helping neighbors".
United Kingdom, the first savings bank was founded in 1810 by the Reverend Henry Duncan, Doctor of Divinity, the minister of RuthwellChurch in Dumfriesshire, Scotland. It is home to the Savings Bank Museum, in which there are records relating to the history of the savings bankmovement in Great Britain, as well as family memorabilia relating to Henry Duncanand other prominent people of the surrounding area. However the main type of institution similar to U.S. savings and loan associations in the United Kingdom is not the savings bank, but the building societyand had existed since the 1770s.
The savings and loan in the 20th century (in the U.S.)
The savings and loan association became a strong force in the early 20th century through assisting people with home ownership, through
mortgagelending, and further assisting their members with basic savingand investingoutlets, typically through passbooksavings accounts and term certificates of deposit.
The savings and loan associations of this era were famously portrayed in the 1946 film "
It's a Wonderful Life".
The earliest of mortgages were not offered by banks, but by
insurancecompanies, and they differed greatly from the mortgage or home loan that is familiar today. Most early mortgages were short term with some kind of balloon paymentat the end of the term, or they were interest-only loans which did not pay anything toward the principal of the loan with each payment. As such, many people were either perpetually in debt in a continuous cycle of refinancing their home purchase, or they lost their home through foreclosurewhen they were unable to make the balloon payment at the end of the term of that loan.
The US Congress passed the
Federal Home Loan Bank Actin 1932, during the Great Depression. It established the Federal Home Loan Bankand associated Federal Home Loan Bank Boardto assist other banks in providing funding to offer long term, amortized loans for home purchases. The idea was to get banks involved in lending, not insurance companies, and to provide realistic loans which people could repay and gain full ownership of their homes.
Savings and loan associations sprung up all across the United States because there was low-cost funding available through the Federal Home Loan Bank for the purposes of mortgage lending.
Savings and loans were given a certain amount of preferential treatment by the
Federal Reserveinasmuch as they were given the ability to pay higher interestrates on savings deposits compared to a regular commercial bank. The idea was that with marginally higher savings rates, savings and loans would attract more deposits that would allow them to continue to write more mortgageloans, which would keep the mortgage market liquid, and funds would always be available to potential borrowers.
However, savings and loans were not allowed to offer checking accounts until the late 1970s. This reduced the attractiveness of savings and loans to consumers, since it required consumers to hold accounts across multiple institutions in order to have access to both checking privileges and competitive savings rates.
In the 1980s the situation changed. The
United States Congressgranted all thrifts in 1980, including savings and loan associations, the power to make consumer and commercial loans and to issue transaction accounts. Designed to help the thrift industry retain its deposit base and to improve its profitability, the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act(DIDMCA) of 1980 allowed thrifts to make consumer loans up to 20 percent of their assets, issue credit cards, accept negotiable order of withdrawal(NOW) accounts from individuals and nonprofit organizations, and invest up to 20 percent of their assets in commercial real estate loans.
In 1982, the Garn-St Germain Depository Institutions Act was passed and increased the proportion of assets that thrifts could hold in consumer and commercial real estate loans and allowed thrifts to invest 5 percent of their assets in commercial loans until
January 1, 1984, when this percentage increased to 10 percent cite book |author=Mishler, Lon; Cole, Robert E. |title=Consumer and business credit management |publisher=Irwin |location=Homewood, Ill |year=1995 |pages=123-124 |isbn=0-256-13948-2 |oclc= |doi=] .
Savings and Loan Crisis, from 1986 to 1995, the number of US federally insured savings and loans in the United States declined from 3,234 to 1,645. [http://www.fdic.gov/bank/analytical/banking/2000dec/brv13n2_2.pdf] This was primarily, but not exclusively, due to unsound real estate lending. [http://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/history/vol2/panel3.pdf] The market share of S&Ls for single family mortgage loans went from 53% in 1975 to 30 % in 1990. [cite news |title= Housing Finance in Developed Countries An International Comparison of Efficiency, United States|url=http://www.fanniemaefoundation.org/programs/jhr/pdf/jhr_0301_ch6_USA.pdf | year=1992 |publisher= Fannie Mae|format=PDF]
"The following is a detailed summary of the major causes for losses that hurt the savings and loan business in the 1980s according to the United States League of Savings:"
# Lack of net worth for many institutions as they entered the 1980s, and a wholly inadequate net worth regulation.
# Decline in the effectiveness of
Regulation Qin preserving the spread between the cost of money and the rate of return on assets, basically stemming from inflation and the accompanying increase in market interest rates.
# Absence of an ability to vary the return on assets with increases in the rate of interest required to be paid for deposits.
# Increased competition on the deposit gathering and mortgage origination sides of the business, with a sudden burst of new technology making possible a whole new way of conducting financial institutions generally and the mortgage business specifically.
# A rapid increase in investment powers of associations with passage of the
Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act(the Garn-St Germain Act), and, more important, through state legislative enactments in a number of important and rapidly growing states. These introduced new risks and speculative opportunities which were difficult to administer. In many instances management lacked the ability or experience to evaluate them, or to administer large volumes of nonresidential construction loans.
# Elimination of regulations initially designed to prevent lending excesses and minimize failures. Regulatory relaxation permitted lending, directly and through participations, in distant loan markets on the promise of high returns. Lenders, however, were not familiar with these distant markets. It also permitted associations to participate extensively in speculative construction activities with builders and developers who had little or no financial stake in the projects.
# Fraud and insider transaction abuses were the principal cause for some 20% of savings and loan failures the past three years and a greater percentage of the dollar losses borne by the
# A new type and generation of opportunistic savings and loan executives and owners—some of whom operated in a fraudulent manner — whose takeover of many institutions was facilitated by a change in FSLIC rules reducing the minimum number of stockholders of an insured association from 400 to one.
# Dereliction of duty on the part of the board of directors of some savings associations. This permitted management to make uncontrolled use of some new operating authority, while directors failed to control expenses and prohibit obvious conflict of interest situations.
# A virtual end of inflation in the American economy, together with overbuilding in multifamily, condominium type residences and in commercial real estate in many cities. In addition, real estate values collapsed in the energy states —
Texas, Louisiana, Oklahomaparticularly due to falling oil prices — and weakness occurred in the mining and agricultural sectors of the economy.
# Pressures felt by the management of many associations to restore net worth ratios. Anxious to improve earnings, they departed from their traditional lending practices into credits and markets involving higher risks, but with which they had little experience.
# The lack of appropriate, accurate, and effective evaluations of the savings and loan business by public accounting firms, security analysts, and the financial community.
# Organizational structure and supervisory laws, adequate for policing and controlling the business in the protected environment of the 1960s and 1970s, resulted in fatal delays and indecision in the examination/supervision process in the 1980s.
# Federal and state examination and supervisory staffs insufficient in number, experience, or ability to deal with the new world of savings and loan operations.
# The inability or unwillingness of the
Bank Boardand its legal and supervisory staff to deal with problem institutions in a timely manner. Many institutions, which ultimately closed with big losses, were known problem cases for a year or more. Often, it appeared, political considerations delayed necessary supervisory actioncite book |author= Norman Strunk, Fred Case |title=Where deregulation went wrong:a look at the causes behind savings and loan failures in the 1980s|publisher= United States League of Savings Institutions |location= Chicago |year=1988|pages=15-16 | isbn=0929097327 9780929097329|oclc=18220698|doi=] .
The consequences of governmental acts and reforms
As a result, the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (
FIRREA) dramatically changed the savings and loan industry and its federal regulation. Here are the highlights of this legislation, signed into law August 9, 1989cite book |author= |title= FIRREA — It's Not a New Sports Car|publisher= The Credit World |location=|date= September-October 1989 |pages=20 |isbn= |oclc= |doi=] :
Federal Home Loan Bank Board( FHLBB) and the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation( FSLIC) were abolished.
Office of Thrift Supervision( OTS), a bureau of the Treasury Department, was created to charter, regulate, examine, and supervise savings institutions.
Federal Housing Finance Board( FHFB) was created as an independent agency to oversee the 12 federal home loan banks (also called district banks).
Savings Association Insurance Fund(SAIF) replaced the FSLICas an ongoing insurance fund for thrift institutions (like the FDIC, the FSLIC was a permanent corporation that insured savings and loan accounts up to $100,000). SAIF is administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Resolution Trust Corporation( RTC) was established to dispose of failed thrift institutions taken over by regulators after January 1, 1989. The RTC will make insured deposits at those institutions available to their customers.
FIRREAgives both Freddie Macand Fannie Maeadditional responsibility to support mortgages for low- and moderate-income families.
The characteristics of savings and loan associations
The most important purpose of these institutions is to make
mortgage loanson residential property. These organizations, which also are known as savings associations, building and loan associations, cooperative banks (in New England), and homestead associations (in Louisiana), are the primary source of financial assistance to a large segment of American homeowners. As home-financing institutions, they give primary attention to single-family residences and are equipped to make loans in this area.
Some of the most important characteristics of a savings and loan association are:
# It is generally a locally owned and privately managed home financing institution.
# It receives individuals' savings and uses these funds to make long-term amortized loans to home purchasers.
# It makes loans for the construction, purchase, repair, or refinancing of houses.
# It is state or federally chartered.
* [http://www.ots.treas.gov/ Office of Thrift Supervision]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.