Ziklag

Ziklag is the Biblical name of a town that was located in the Negev region in the south of what was the Kingdom of Judah. Its exact location has not been identified with any certainty, though by the end of the 19th century, both Haluza (by the Wadi-Aslu to the south of Beersheba) and Khirbet Zuheiliqah (located to the north west of Beersheba and south southeast of Gaza city) had been suggested ["Jewish Encyclopedia"; "Easton's Bible Dictionary"] . "Ziklag" is generally agreed to be a significant corruption of the location's actual name [Cheyne and Black, "Encyclopedia Biblica"] ; Haluza was identified as the location on the basis of "Ziklag" being a corruption of "Halusah" (slightly clearer in the underlying Hebrew script than in English), meaning "fortress"; Khirbet Zuheiliqah was identified as the location on the basis of "Ziklag" being a corruption of "Zahaliku", which means "downward slopes" and is descriptive of Khirbet Zuheilikah's location [ibid] . The excavators of Tell Zeitah have suggested it as a possible location of Ziklag. [ See, for example, the introduction on the excavation's official [http://www.zeitah.net/overview.html website] .]

The Book of Genesis refers to an individual named "Casluhim" as the founder of the Philistines, though biblical scholars regard this as an eponym rather than an individual, and it is thought possible that the name is a corruption of "Halusah"; with the identification of Ziklag as Haluza, this suggests that Ziklag was the original base from which the Philistines captured the remainder of their territory [ibid] . It has also been proposed that Ziklag subsequently became the capital of the Cherethites [ibid] .

In the lists of cities of the Israelites by tribe given in the Book of Joshua, Ziklag appears both as a town belonging to the Tribe of Judah [Joshua 15:31] and as a town belonging to the Tribe of Simeon [Joshua 19:5] . Textual scholars believe that these lists were originally independent administrative documents, not necessarily dating from the same time, and hence reflecting the changing tribal boundaries ["Jewish Encyclopedia", "Book of Joshua", et passim] . The Books of Samuel claim that by the time of David, the town was under the control of Philistines, but subsequently was given by their king - Achish - to David, who at that time was seemingly acting as a vassal of the Philistines. Biblical scholars argue that the town was probably on the eastern fringe of the Philistines' territory, and that it was natural for it to be annexed to Judah when David became king ["Peake's commentary on the Bible"] . Since the compilation of the Book of Joshua is regarded by textual scholars as late, probably being due to the deuteronomist, it is possible that the tribal allocations given within it date from after this annexation rather than before [ibid] .

According to the Books of Samuel [1 Samuel 30] , while David was encamped with the Philistine army for an attack on the Kingdom of Israel, Ziklag was raided by Amalekites; the Amalekites burning the town, and capturing its population without killing them (scholars think this capture refers to enslavement [ibid] ). However, none of the archaeological sites which have been variously suspected to be Ziklag show any evidence of destruction during the era of David ["Biblical Archaeology Review", "Where is David's Ziklag", May-June 1993] .

In the narrative, when David's men discovered that their families had been captured, they became angry with David, but once David had sought divination from the ephod that Abiathar possessed, he managed to persuade them to join him in a pursuit of the captors, as the divination was favourable. Six hundred men went in pursuit, but a third of them were too exhausted to go further than the Besor gorge. They found an abandoned and starving slave, formerly belonging to one of the Amalekites who had raided Ziklag, and having given him fig cake, raisin cake, and water, persuaded him to lead them to the Amalekite raiders. The slave lead them to the camp of the captors, and found the captors holding a feast and celebrating, due to the size of their spoil; David's forces engaged in battle with them for a night and a day, and ultimately became victorious.

Textual scholars ascribe this narrative to the "monarchial source" of the Books of Samuel ["Jewish Encyclopedia", "Books of Samuel"] ; the "rival" source, known as the "republican source" (named this due to its negative presentation of David, Saul, and other kings) [ibid] , does not at first glace appear to contain a similar narrative. The same narrative position is occupied in the "republican source" by the story of Nabal [ibid] , who lived in the region south of Hebron (which includes the Negev) ["Peake's commentary on the Bible"] . There are some similarities between the narratives, including David leading an army in revenge (for Nabal's unwillingness to gift provisions to David), with 400 of the army going ahead and 200 staying behind [ibid] , as well as David gaining Abigail as a wife (though in the Ziklag narrative he "re-gains" her), as well as several provisions, and there being a jovial feast in the enemy camp (ie Nabal's property). However, there are also several differences, such as the victory and provisions being obtained by Abigail's peaceful actions rather than a heroic victory by David, the 200 that stayed behind doing so to protect the "baggage" rather than due to exhaustion, the main secondary character being the wife of the enemy (Nabal) rather than their former slave, David's forces being joined by damsels rather than rejoining their wives, and Nabal rather than the Amalekites being the enemy.

The Books of Samuel go on to mention that as a result the people taken by the Amalekites were released, and the spoil that the Amalekites had taken, including livestock, and spoil from attacks elsewhere, were divided among David's men, including the third that had remained at the Besor. This ruling, that even those left behind would get a share, is stated by the text to have been a response by David to those who believed only the two thirds of David's men that had battled with the Amalekites should get a reward. A similar ruling is given in the Priestly Code [Numbers 31:27] and Book of Joshua [Joshua 22:8] , and scholars believe that the these rulings are derived from the decision in regard to the Amalekite spoil, rather than vice versa ["Peake's commentary on the Bible"] .

According to the text, once back at Ziklag, David sent portions of the spoil to the various community leaders "within Judah"; the text gives a list of the locations of the recipients, but they are all just within the Negev [ibid] .

Notes