[cite web | title=Strong feelings over Pakistan rape laws | work= | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6152520.stm | accessdate=Nov 18 | accessyear=2006 ] The three chief architects of the bill are reported to be former Attorney General Makhdoom Ali Khan who was responsible for it taking legal shape, Javed Ahmad Ghamidi and the Chairman of the Council of Islamic Ideology Muhammad Khalid Masud.]The new Women's Protection Bill brings rape under the Pakistan Penal Code, which is based on civil law, not Sharia (Islamic law). The Bill removes the right of police to detain people suspected of having sex outside of marriage, instead requiring a formal accusation in court. Under the changes, adultery and non-marital consensual sex is still an offence but now judges would be allowed to try rape cases in criminal rather than Islamic courts. That does away with the need for the four witnesses and allows convictions to be made on the basis of forensic and circumstantial evidence.Fact|date=September 2008
The amendments change the punishment for someone convicted of having consensual sex outside marriage to imprisonment of up to five years and a fine of Rs10,000. Rape would be punishable with 10 to 25 years of imprisonment but with death or life imprisonment if committed by two or more persons together, while adultery would remain under the Hudood ordinance and is punishable with stoning to death. It is the change in the punishment for fornication and rape which is the major source of controversy. Fact|date=September 2008
The Bill also outlaws statutory rape i.e. sex with girls under the age of 16. The Islamic code bans sex with girls before puberty.Fact|date=September 2008
Controversy
Under the Hudood Ordinance, it has been claimed that women were routinely jailed for adultery on flimsy evidence, often when a former husband refused to recognize a divorce. It is alleged that the legislation led to thousands of women being imprisoned without being proved whether they were actually guilty. This risk of imprisonment, it is contended, has kept many women from trying to bring their attackers to justice. The Commission of Inquiry on Women, headed by Justice Nasir Aslam Zahid, had recommended the repeal of the Hudood Ordinances in 1997, as did the National Commission on the Status of Women in 2002. [ [http://www.hrcp-web.org/NCSW_Report.cfm NATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN'S REPORT ON HUDOOD ORDINANCES 1979] ] The Women's Protection Bill is intended to amend Hudood Ordinance in order to address these issues.
On the other hand, the laws have been fiercely criticized by Islamist groups in Pakistan.[ [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6152520.stm Strong feelings over Pakistan rape laws ] ] Justice (retired) Taqi Usmani, a former judge of the Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan and the Sharia Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, has written a paper in which he claimed that these allegations were baseless and were not according to the facts. [Mufti Taqi Usmani (retired judge), [http://www.hudoodordinance.com/taqi-usmani-article-english.htm The Reality of ‘Women Protection Bill’] ] In addition, he cited a study by Charles Kennedy, pertinent portion of which states:]"Women fearing conviction under Section 10(2) frequently bring charges of rape under 10(3) against their alleged partners. The FSC finding no circumstantial evidence to support the latter charge, convict the male accused under section 10(2)….the women is exonerated of any wrongdoing due to reasonable doubt rule."(Charles Kennedy: The Status of Women in Pakistan in Islamization of Laws page 74) [Mufti Taqi Usmani (retired judge), [http://www.hudoodordinance.com/taqi-usmani-article-english.htm The Reality of ‘Women Protection Bill’] ]
Consequently, this issue is one of the widely debated ones both by politicians and by religious scholars, often only representing a single point of view. Liberal politicians and women's' rights activists have welcomed the reforms as progress - but say they do not go far enough. The Religious political parties however are against the Bill calling it un-Islamic. They argue that the bill goes against articles 2a and 227 of the constitution of Pakistan, which state respectively that "Islam will be the state religion" and "No laws will be passed which are repugnant to the Koran and sunnah." The government has called the legislation "historic" and says that it does not go against the tenets of Islam.Fact|date=September 2008
ee also
* Pervez Musharraf
* Zia ul-Haq
* Hudood Ordinance
*Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal
External links
* [http://www.pakistani.org/pakistan/legislation/2006/wpb.html Text of Protection of Women (Criminal Laws Amendment) Act, 2006 a.k.a. Women's Protection Bill]
References