Causes for Liberation of French colonies in India

Many interrelated political, cultural, socio-economic and geographical factors contributed to the liberation of French Establishments in India.

Geographical and cultural divergence

Geographical and cultural divergence in the French India made the French weak in keeping their hold these colonies.

*Pondichéry:
**Location: Southern region of Madras Presidency.
**Language: Tamil.
**Culture: There the culture and way of life of people was typical Tamil lifestyle.
**External factors: Then was the time, when the Tamil people in Madras Presidency were very powerful at Centre and State governments in Indian Union. They used to have large impact on local pondicherians.
**Views: There was a mixed proportion of "nationalist and francophile sentiments" prevailing in Pondichéry.
**Sphere of Influence: Pondichéry and its neighbouring communes were completely under the sphere of influence of Pondichéry.

*Chandernagore:
**Location: West Bengal State.
**Language: Bengali.
**Culture: There the culture and way of life of people was typical Bengali lifestyle.
**External factors: Bengal unit of Indian National Congress used to show large influence on Chandernagore.
**Views: Since Bengal Presidency was one of the birthplaces for Indian Nationalism, Chandernagore used to have "strong feelings of Indian nationalism and predominant anti-French sentiments".
**Sphere of Influence: It was completely out of sphere of influence of Pondichéry.

*Karikal:
**Location: 132 km to the south of Pondichéry in Madras Presidency.
**Language: Tamil.
**Culture: There the culture and way of life of people was typical Tamil lifestyle. It was the only colony in French India which does not have much of cultural and linguitic differences w.r.t Pondichéry.
**External factors: The changes political movements in Pondichéry and Madras State used to have very impact on Karikal.
**Views: From a long time, Karikal used to have "anti-French sentiments" prevailed in them.
**Sphere of Influence: It was completely underr sphere of influence of Pondichéry.

*Mahé:
**Location: It was located along the Malabar coast of Arabian sea in Madras Presidency.
**Language: Malayalam.
**Culture: There the culture and way of life of people was typical Malayali lifestyle.
**External factors: Keralite Congress politicians in Madras Presidency used to influence Mahé.
**Views: Mahé used to have "strong impact of nationalist feelings".
**Sphere of Influence: It was largely out of sphere of influence of Pondichéry.

*Yanaon:
**Location: Along the coast of Godavari in northern region of Madras Presidency.
**Language: Telugu.
**Culture: There the culture and way of life of people was typical Andhra lifestyle.
**External factors: Andhra State politics had no impact on pro-French Yanam.
**Views: Yanaon used to have "extremely dominant pro-French atmosphere". It was the only colony which had very high francophile population in native people.
**Sphere of Influence: It was largely out of sphere of influence of Pondichéry.

Decolonization phenomenon

Decolonization was a global phenomenon which was predominant colonial world between 1940 and 1960s. Many colonies thought of having independence from colonial empires. Nationalism and Socialism had played very important role in achieving this in many colonies globally.

Pre-Independence factors

*Insignificance in population and area: This was one of very dominant causes for liberation of French colonies in India.
** Insignificance in territorial size: The insignificance in area compared with the Indian Union. The total area of the settlements was well under 2,000 square miles, that of the Union (excluding Kashmir) well over 1,000,000 square miles.
** Insignificant in population size: The insignificance in population compared with Indian Union. The total population of the settlements was less than 1,000,000 that of the Union over 360,000,000.

* Lack of clearcut frontiers with India: Very few of the settlements had clear-cut frontiers with India. There were many enclaves entirely surrounded by Indian territory, especially in Pondicherry region.

* Economic Factors: The very economic existence of the settlements depended on Indian goodwill.

* Lack of military resistance: If India wished to annex the settlements forcibly there was very little that France could do to stop her.

The above four factors are most important factors that existed in 1947 which ultimately led to merger of French colonies in India.

Post-Independence factors

After independence, the factors that lead to merger are,
* Indian Nationalism: With the Independence of India in 1947, there was rise of Indian nationalism in the people of the colonies in India. This was clearly seen by the rise of nationalist local parties in those regions. Their increasing dominance in the politics of French India created an anti-French feeling in people.

* Shift of Socialists: This was the most important Post-independent cause, probably the sole cause that led ultimately to the liberation of French colonies in India. The members of Inde française parti socialiste (French India Socialist Party) known as Socialists have shifted they stance towards pro-Merger nationalist groups. This gave a catastrophic and devastating effect to the French rule in India. The switch of Edouard Goubert towards pro-Merger camp became the death knell to the French sovereignty in its colonies.

Immediate Causes for liberation

Governor's interference

A momentous event in the freedom movement of Pondichéry occurred on 18 March 1954, when the members of the executive council and mayor of Pondichéry and seven adjoining communes proclaimed their decision to merge with Indian Union without a referendum. All the communes in Karikal also followed suit. This decision was to be confirmed by the Representative Assembly and when the French India Socialist Party was preparing to move the merger resolution, the French Governor scuttled it by postponing the session. Provoked by this, the Socialists planned to capture the outlying communes one by one and move to Pondichéry. Accordingly, the leaders of the French India Socialist Party hoisted the Indian National Flag atop the Nettapakkam police station on the last day of March in 1954.

Result of Governor General's interference,
*Capture of Nettapacom commune.
*Capture of Mannadipet and Bahour communes.
*Formation of Provisional government at Nettapacom.

Kandamangalam Conference

The conclusion of Consul General,Sri Kewal Singh on the night of 11 April 1954 at the conference at Kandamangalam, that "For real liberation of colonies one should attack any of the big four French settlements", Since the French authorities are making fun of petty provisional government at Nettapacom. Since Yanam is small in area and population, he requested Monsieur Dadala for a plan for its liberation which resulted not only the Coup d'État de Yanaon but also the ultimate liberation of French colonies in India.

Result of conclusion at Kandamangalam conference,
*Coup d'État de Yanaon under Dadala Raphael Ramanayya on Sunday, 13 June 1954. Yanaon liberated by Indian Military.
*Picketing by Mahajana Sabha under I. K. Kumaran at Mahé, 16 June 1954. Mahé liberated, it was handed over by its Administrator to people.

Date of events

Active Members involved in Liberation

* V Subbaih
* Edouard Goubert, Maire de Pondichéry
* Sellane Naicker,
* Sri Kewal Singh, Consul General
* Venkatasubba Reddiar, Conseil municipal de nettapacom
* I. K. Kumaran
* C. E. Bharathan
* Mangalat Raghavan
* Dadala Raphael Ramanayya
* Kamichetty Venugopala Rao Naidou, Membre du assemblée représentative de Yanaon
* Yerra Jagannatha Rao
* Yerra Satyanarayana (George Babu)
* Madimchetty Satianandam, Maire de Yanaon

ee also

* Municipal Administration in French India
* Dadala Raphael Ramanayya
* Coup d'État de Yanaon
* Pondicherry
* Coup d'état
* Karikal
* Mahé
* Yanaon

References

*"My Struggle for freedom of French Provinces in India" autobiography written by Sri Dadala Raphael Ramanayya

External links

* [http://meaindia.nic.in/treatiesagreement/1956/chap133.htm Indian Ministry for External Affaires - 1956 Treaty of Cession]
* [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1955.tb02588.x/ THE FRENCH AND PORTUGUESE SETTLEMENTS IN INDIA]
* [http://www.links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0362-8949(19500322)19%3A6%3C62%3ATFOFI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-%23 Future of French India, by Russel H. Fifield (Associate Professor of Political Science at University of Michigan]