2004 Financial buildings plot

The 2004 Financial buildings plot was a plan led by Dhiren Barot to attack a number of targets in the U.S. and the United Kingdom which is believed to have been approved by al-Qaeda.

The evidence against the plotters consisted of home videos, written notes, and files on computers. At the time of the arrests the group had no funding, vehicles, or access to bomb-making equipment. [cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6122270.stm|date=6 November 2006|title=Prosecution case against al-Qaeda Briton|publisher=BBC News|accessdate=2006-11-08]

All eight suspects have pleaded guilty. One of the men, Dhiren Barot, pleaded guilty early on and was sentenced to 40 years in jail. The trials of seven co-defendants began in April and May 2007. [cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,2070672,00.html|date=May 2 2007|title=Trial begins over plan to bomb British and US targets|publisher=The Guardian|accessdate=2007-05-08]

The plot and evidence

The plots which were uncovered were in the form of proposals found on a laptop seized in Pakistan, and notebooks and videos found in the possession of the suspects after their arrests, and in deleted files on a hard disk.

Although Barot had been under surveillance since 15 June 2004, a counter-terrorism source admitted that there was little or no admissible evidence against him at the time of his arrest on 3 August.cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1941988,00.html|date=8 November 2006|title=Most senior al-Qaida terrorist yet captured in Britain gets 40 years for plotting carnage|first=Rosie|last=Cowan|publisher=The Guardian|accessdate=2006-11-08]

At the time of the arrests, the law required terrorist suspects to be charged or released within 14 days. Due to the difficulty in framing charges against the arrested which required time-consuming searches through hard disks to find evidence for the plots that were planned, the government proposed that this time limit be extended to 90 days.Fact|date=February 2007

There is strong skepticism in several quarters as to whether any of these plots could have gone ahead without arousing suspicion, or were even superficially viable.cite web|url=http://p10.hostingprod.com/@spyblog.org.uk/blog/2006/11/dhiren_barot_life_sentence_for_impractical_movie_plot_terrorist_plans.html| date=8 November 2006|title=Dhiren Barot - life sentence for impractical "movie plot" terrorist plans?|accessdate=2006-11-08|publisher=Spyblog] cite web|url=http://www.blairwatch.co.uk/node/1440|date=8 November 2006|title=Today's Boiling Over With Anger Moment/Barot Case|author=Tom|publisher=Blairwatch|accessdate=2006-11-08]

The plan to blow up financial buildings in the U.S.

This was a plan formulated by Barot while he was in New York posing as a student in 2000 and 2001 prior to the September 11 attacks, of which he apparently had no foreknowledge.

Barot's targets were the International Monetary Fund and World Bank buildings in Washington, DC, the New York Stock Exchange and Citigroup buildings in New York City and the Prudential building in Newark, New Jersey.

He wrote a series of detailed reports describing the importance of the targets, the outlines of the buildings, and the logistics of mounting an explosive attack. He also visited and filmed them from the street in a series of short clips that were discovered in the middle of a copy of the movie Die Hard. The images of this evidence have been posted on the web. [cite web|url=http://www.met.police.uk/pressbureau/rhyme/index.htm|title=Operation Rhyme|publisher=Metropolitan Police|accessdate=2006-11-08]

The plans appeared to have been shelved after the successful al-Qaeda attacks on those cities on September 11. [cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1941187,00.html|date=7 November 2006|title=Buried inside a Bruce Willis video, the evidence of a plot to kill thousands|first=Rosie|last=Cowan|publisher=The Guardian|accessdate=2006-11-08]

The gas limos project

The most detailed plan was to pack three stretch limousines with commercially available gas canisters and park them in an underground carpark (where a truck bomb wouldn't have fit) for the purpose of inflicting "mass damage and chaos".cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1941675,00.html|date=7 November 2006|title='Mass damage and chaos'|publisher=The Guardian|accessdate=2006-11-08]

No targets were given, but there were indications that hotels and mainline train stations were being considered.

No terrorist bomb makers have succeeded in using commercial gas cylinders to collapse a building.

The dirty bomb using smoke detectors project

Barot's proposals for his dirty bomb project were inspired by a road accident in France involving a truck carrying 900 smoke detectors, which caused concern over possible exposure to the radio-active material contained in them.

Barot formulated a plan involving 10,000 smoke detectors either set on fire or placed on top of an explosive device, and worked out a budget requiring £50,000 for material (£5 for each smoke detector) and £20,000 for storage. Back of the envelope calculations suggest that this would have the volume of four telephone boxes and contain only trace quantities of radio-activity.

According to expert evidence supplied by the prosecution during his trial, it could have contaminated as many as 500 people but was unlikely to have caused any deaths.cite news|http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6044938.stm|publisher=BBC News|title=Man admits UK-US terror bomb plot|date=12 October 2006|accessdate=2006-10-13]

The plot to blow up trains under the Thames

There was also a plan to set timed explosives on the London Underground in order to cause the river to flood the lines.The likely quantity of explosive required to rupture many metres of reinforced concrete and bedrock widely enough to allow water to flow into the tunnel system at any significant rate is so large as to make this a very unrealistic plan.Fact|date=February 2007

The arrests

A group of fourteen men, called the "Luton cell", were arrested in the UK in the Luton area on 3 August 2004.cite web|url=http://www.spy.org.uk/spyblog/2004/08/terrorist_suspects_arrested_to.html|title=Terrorist suspects arrested too soon ?|date=17 August 2004|accessdate=2006-10-12|author=spyblog] Barot was arrested while having his hair cut in a barber shop in north London.

It is believed that the timing of the arrests was driven by the leaking of the identity of Muhammad Naeem Noor Khan, an alleged Al Qaeda double agent and computer expert, to The New York Times the previous day. [cite news|url=http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2004/08/10/leak_of_qaeda_suspect_name_criticized/|title=Leak of Qaeda suspect name criticized|first=Charlie|last=Savage|coauthors=Bryan Bender|date=10 August 2004|publisher=The Boston Globe|accessdate=2006-10-12]

The charges

On 17 August 2004, two weeks later, eight men, Dhiren Barot, Mohammed Naveed Bhatti, Abdul Aziz Jalil, Omar Abdul Rehman, Junade Feroze, Zia Ul Haq, Qaisar Shaffi, and Nadeem Tarmohammed, were handed various charges of conspiracy to murder; conspiracy to commit a public nuisance by the use of radioactive materials, toxic gases, chemicals and or explosives; and possessing a document or record of information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1285707,00.html|publisher=The Guardian|date=18 August 2004|title=Anti-terror investigation: the full charges|accessdate=2006-10-12] Barot has been seen a leader of the group, identified as the individual called "Britani" who "Osama bin Laden had sent to the United States 'to case potential economic and "Jewish" targets in New York City' for possible attack." [ Britain Charges 8 In Alleged Terror Plot, Plan Targeted U.S. Financial Buildings, John Mintz and Kamran Khan, Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7913-2004Aug17.html, August 18 2004, accessed October 12 2006] Five of the men were released without charge. Matthew Monks was charged with possession of a prohibited weapon, thought to be a Brocock air pistol, and released on bail. [cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3575106.stm|title=Terror suspects appear in court|date=18 August 2004|publisher=BBC News|accessdate=2006-10-12]

The group had no funding, vehicles or bomb-making equipment,cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1920900,00.html|title=Man admits plotting UK and US terror strikes|date=12 October 2006|publisher=The Guardian|accessdate=2006-10-12] however the incriminating documents included reconnaissance plans of the buildings in the U.S., two notebooks containing information on explosives, poisons, chemicals and related matters, and an extract of the Terrorist's Handbook, all classed as "information likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism" under the Terrorism Act 2000.

On 12 April 2005, the U.S. authorities brought charges against three of the men, Dhiren Barot (also known as Esa al-Hindi), Nadeem Tarmohamed, and Qaisar Shaffi. The indictment accused Barot of being at a jihad training camp in Afghanistan in 1998 and of doing surveillance of targets in the U.S. between 2000 and 2001 while posing as a student. It accused all three men of conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction to damage and destroy buildings used in interstate and foreign commerce. When pressed by reporters on the lack of any allegations of a connection to al Qaeda in the indictment in spite of earlier reports that tied Barot directly to the September 11, 2001 attacks [cite news|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5738292/site/newsweek/|title=Bin Laden’s Mystery Man|date=20 August 2004|first=Michael|last=Isikoff|coauthors=Mark Hosenball|publisher=Newsweek|accessdate=2006-10-13] , Deputy Attorney General James Comey said, "I didn't say there is no connection to al Qaeda. I said we have not alleged a connection to al Qaeda in this indictment." [cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/04/12/terror.indictment/index.html|title=U.S. indicts three in alleged terror plot Case linked to 2004 terror alerts in New York, Washington|date=13 April 2005|first=Kelli|last=Arena|coauthors=Kevin Bohn|publisher=CNN|accessdate=2006-10-12]

The conviction

On 12 October 2006, Barot pleaded guilty in a UK court to "conspiring to murder people in terrorist campaigns in Britain and the US." The prosecutor said that evidence had been found on a computer after his arrest which showed plans to carry out explosions designed to kill as many innocent people as possible at the U.S. buildings.cite news|http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6044938.stm|publisher=BBC News|title=Man admits UK-US terror bomb plot|date=12 October 2006|accessdate=2006-10-13]

The sentencing

On 7 November, Barot was sentenced to life and told he must serve at least 40 years in jail. [cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6123236.stm|title=Al-Qaeda plotter jailed for life|date=7 November 2006|accessdate=2006-11-08|publisher=BBC News] He remains locked-down for 19 hours a day in Belmarsh Prison [UK Parliament|date=7 December 2006|place=Westminster Hall Debates|speaker=Patrick Mercer|column=168|url=http://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?gid=2006-12-07a.168.0|title=Terrorism (Detention and Human Rights)]

References