Affirming a disjunct

Affirming a disjunct

The logical fallacy of affirming a disjunct also known as the fallacy of the alternative disjunct occurs when a deductive argument takes either of the two following forms:

:A or B:A :Therefore, it is not the case that B

:A or B:B:Therefore, it is not the case that A

The fallacy lies in concluding that one disjunct must be false because the other disjunct is true; in fact they may both be true. A similar form that is valid has the second premise (rather than the conclusion) be a negation. The valid form is known as disjunctive syllogism.

The following argument is a clear case of this fallacy:

:It will rain somewhere tomorrow or the sun will shine somewhere tomorrow.:It will rain somewhere tomorrow. (It will rain here according to the weather forecast).:Therefore, it is not the case that the sun will shine somewhere tomorrow.

This inference is obviously invalid. The sun is almost always shining somewhere on earth. Both of the premises are clearly true while the conclusion is clearly false.

The following example is trickier:

:Two is an even number or two is an odd number.:Two is an even number.:Therefore, it is not the case that two is an odd number.

This argument seems to be valid because there is another use of the word "or" in ordinary language that would seem more appropriate. If the disjunction is exclusive, that is to say, the "or" implies that only one of the disjuncts is perfectly true, then the argument is valid. However, the meaning of "or" is stipulated in propositional logic in order to avoid equivocation, and this argument is "invalid". In this case, the "or" is said to be inclusive, in that it stipulates that one or both of the disjuncts is true. A similar argument that is in fact valid will have the implied assumption explicitly stated, as follows:

:Two is an even number or two is an odd number.:Two is an even number.:"No number can be both even and odd.":Therefore, it is not the case that two is an odd number.

ee also

* Exclusive disjunction
* Logical disjunction
* Syllogistic fallacy

External links

* [http://www.fallacyfiles.org/afonedis.html Fallacy files: affirming a disjunct]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно сделать НИР?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Affirming the consequent — Affirming the consequent, sometimes called converse error, is a formal fallacy, committed by reasoning in the form: If P, then Q. Q. Therefore, P. An argument of this form is invalid, i.e., the conclusion can be false even when statements 1 and 2 …   Wikipedia

  • Non sequitur (logic) — Non sequitur (Latin for it does not follow ), in formal logic, is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises.[1] In a non sequitur, the conclusion could be either true or false, but the argument is fallacious because… …   Wikipedia

  • List of fallacies — For specific popular misconceptions, see List of common misconceptions. A fallacy is incorrect argumentation in logic and rhetoric resulting in a lack of validity, or more generally, a lack of soundness. Contents 1 Formal fallacies 1.1… …   Wikipedia

  • Fallacy — In logic and rhetoric, a fallacy is usually incorrect argumentation in reasoning resulting in a misconception or presumption. By accident or design, fallacies may exploit emotional triggers in the listener or interlocutor (appeal to emotion), or… …   Wikipedia

  • List of philosophy topics (A-C) — 110th century philosophy 11th century philosophy 12th century philosophy 13th century philosophy 14th century philosophy 15th century philosophy 16th century philosophy 17th century philosophy 18th century philosophy 19th century philosophy220th… …   Wikipedia

  • Denying the antecedent — Denying the antecedent, sometimes also called inverse error, is a formal fallacy, committed by reasoning in the form: If P, then Q. Not P. Therefore, not Q. Arguments of this form are invalid. Informally, this means that arguments of this form do …   Wikipedia

  • Outline of logic — The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to logic: Logic – formal science of using reason, considered a branch of both philosophy and mathematics. Logic investigates and classifies the structure of statements and… …   Wikipedia

  • Logical disjunction — Disjunction redirects here. For separation of chromosomes, see Meiosis. For disjunctions in distribution, see Disjunct distribution. Venn diagram of the logical disjunction of A and B …   Wikipedia

  • Ambiguity — Sir John Tenniel s illustration of the Caterpillar for Lewis Carroll s Alice s Adventures in Wonderland is noted for its ambiguous central figure, whose head can be viewed as being a human male s face with a pointed nose and pointy chin or being… …   Wikipedia

  • False dilemma — A false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, the either or fallacy, fallacy of false choice, black and white thinking, or the fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses) is a type of logical fallacy that involves a situation in which only two alternatives …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
… Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”