Fallacy of four terms

Fallacy of four terms

The fallacy of four terms (Latin: "quaternio terminorum") is the logical fallacy that occurs when a categorical syllogism has four terms.

Valid categorical syllogisms always have three terms:

:Major premise: All fish have fins.:Minor premise: All goldfish are fish.:Conclusion: All goldfish have fins.

Here, the three terms are: "goldfish," "fish," and "fins."

Using four terms invalidates the syllogism:

:Major premise: All fish have fins.:Minor premise: All goldfish are fish.:Conclusion: All humans have fins.

The premises don't connect "humans" with "fins", so the reasoning is invalid. Notice that there are four terms: "fish", "fins", "goldfish" and "humans". Two premises aren't enough to connect four different terms, since in order to establish connection, there must be one term common to both premises.

In everyday reasoning, the fallacy of four terms occurs most frequently by equivocation: using the same word or phrase but with a different meaning each time, creating a fourth term even though only three distinct words are used:

:Major premise: Nothing is better than eternal happiness.:Minor premise: A ham sandwich is better than nothing.:Conclusion: A ham sandwich is better than eternal happiness.

The word "nothing" in the example above has two meanings, as presented: "nothing is better" means the thing being named has the highest value possible; "better than nothing" means the thing being described has only marginal value. Therefore, "nothing" acts as two different words in this example, thus creating the fallacy of four terms.

Another example of equivocation, a more tricky one:

:Major premise: The hand touches the pen.:Minor premise: The pen touches the paper.:Conclusion: The hand touches the paper.

This is more clear if you use "is touching" instead of "touches." It then becomes clear that "touching the pen" is not the same as "the pen," thus creating four terms: "the hand" "touching the pen", "the pen", "touching the paper." A correct form of this statement would be:

:Major premise: The hand touches the pen.:Minor premise: All that touches the pen, touches the paper.:Conclusion: The hand touches the paper.

Now the term "the pen" has been eliminated, leaving three terms.

The fallacy of four terms is a syllogistic fallacy. Types of syllogism to which it applies include statistical syllogism, hypothetical syllogism, and categorical syllogism, all of which must have exactly three terms.

External links

* [http://www.fallacyfiles.org/fourterm.html Fallacy files: Fallacy of four terms]
* [http://atheism.about.com/library/glossary/general/bldef_fourterms.htm Atheismweb: Fallacy of four terms]
* [http://onegoodmove.org/fallacy/four.htm Fallacy of the Four Terms (quaternio terminorum)]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • four-term fallacy — The fallacy committed when the middle term of a syllogism has a different sense in each premise (i.e. the syllogism really has four terms instead of the necessary three). For example: ‘All men are wolves, all wolves live in the arctic, therefore… …   Philosophy dictionary

  • Deductive fallacy — A deductive fallacy is defined as a deductive argument that is invalid. The argument itself could have true premises, but still have a false conclusion.[1] Thus, a deductive fallacy is a fallacy where deduction goes wrong, and is no longer a… …   Wikipedia

  • Syllogistic fallacy — Syllogistic fallacies are logical fallacies that occur in syllogisms. They include: Any syllogism type (other than polysyllogism and disjunctive): *fallacy of four terms Occurring in categorical syllogisms: *affirmative conclusion from a negative …   Wikipedia

  • Fallacy — In logic and rhetoric, a fallacy is usually incorrect argumentation in reasoning resulting in a misconception or presumption. By accident or design, fallacies may exploit emotional triggers in the listener or interlocutor (appeal to emotion), or… …   Wikipedia

  • fallacy — Any error of reasoning. Reasoning may fail in many ways, and a great variety of fallacies have been distinguished and named. The main division is into formal fallacies in which something purports to be deductively valid reasoning but is not, and… …   Philosophy dictionary

  • Naturalistic fallacy — The naturalistic fallacy is often claimed to be a formal fallacy. It was described and named by British philosopher G. E. Moore in his 1903 book Principia Ethica. Moore stated that a naturalistic fallacy is committed whenever a philosopher… …   Wikipedia

  • List of literary terms — The following is a list of literary terms; that is, those words used in discussion, classification, criticism, and analysis of literature.: See also: Glossary of poetry terms, Literary criticism, Literary theory CompactTOC8 name=Contents… …   Wikipedia

  • Nirvana fallacy — The nirvana fallacy is the logical error of comparing actual things with unrealistic, idealized alternatives. It can also refer to the tendency to assume that there is a perfect solution to a particular problem. A closely related concept is the… …   Wikipedia

  • Glossary of poker terms — The following is a glossary of poker terms used in the card game of poker. It supplements the Glossary of card terms. Besides the terms listed here, there are thousands of common and uncommon poker slang terms. This is not intended to be a formal …   Wikipedia

  • "Human genetic diversity: Lewontin's fallacy" (scientific paper) — Infobox Multi Locus Allele Clusters   In a haploid population, when a single locus is considered (blue), with two alleles, + and …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”