- Capital punishment in the Republic of China
Capital punishment is a legal form ofpunishment in theRepublic of China (Taiwan ). Before 2000, Taiwan had a relatively high execution rate [http://fju.lawbank.com.tw/room-reply.asp?tpid=395&tid=128] when some strict laws were still in effect in the harsh political environment. However after some controversial cases during the 1990s plus former PresidentChen Shui-bian 's attitude towards abolition, the number of executions dropped significantly since 2002, with only three executions in 2005 and none since 2006.Crimes eligible for death penalty
Under military law
The (陸海空軍刑法) of the Republic of China rules the following crimes eligible for death penalty on ROC military personnels: [ [http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Query4B.asp?FullDoc=%A9%D2%A6%B3%B1%F8%A4%E5&Lcode=F0120001 編章節 - 條文內容 ] ] :
*
Treason (Article 14,15)
*Collaboration (Article 17,18)
*Espionage (Article 19,20)
*Defection (Article 24)
*Malfeasance (Article 26,27)
*Disclosure of intelligence or secrets (Article 31)
*Desertion (Article 41,42)
*Disobeying orders (Article 47,48)
*Mutiny (Article 49,50)
*Hijacking (Article 53)
*Destroying military supplies and equipment (Article 58)
*Stealing and sellingammunition (Article 65)
*Fabricating orders (Article 66)Under civilian law
The
Republic of China Criminal Code () rules the following offenses eligible for death penalty, although none of them carries mandatory death penalty [ [http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/newsdetail.asp?no=1C0000001 法規 ] ] :
*Treason (Article 101)
*Espionage (Article 103,104,105,107)
*Hijacking (Article 185-1)
*Murder (Article 271,272)
*Robbery with murder,rape , orarson (Article 332)
*Piracy (Article 333,334)
*Kidnap ping (Article 347,348)Article 63 of the Criminal Code also rules that death penalty cannot be imposed on juvenile offenders aged under 18 or senile offenders aged above 80 for any offenses.
Other special laws which rule non-compulsory capital offenses:
*Unauthorized manufacture, trafficking or selling ofheroin ,opium ,morphine orcocaine (Act for the Control of Drug Abuse, Article 4) [ [http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Query4A.asp?FullDoc=all&Fcode=C0000008 ±ø¤å¤º®e ] ]
*Unauthorized manufacture, trafficking or selling offirearm weapons (Act for the Control of Weapons, Article 7) [ [http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Query4A.asp?FullDoc=all&Fcode=D0080047 條文內容 ] ]
*Seriouscounterfeit ing which disturbs financial order(Act for the Punishment of Counterfeiting, Article 3) [ [http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Query4A.asp?FullDoc=all&Fcode=C0000003 條文內容 ] ]Defunct laws
The following two laws gave certain offenses a mandatory death penalty. More than half of the executed 658 people mentioned earlier lost their lives because of these laws:
*Act for the Control and Punishment of Rebellion (, rescinded in May 1991 [ [http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Query4A.asp?FullDoc=all&Fcode=C0000010 條文內容 ] ] ) which imposed a mandatory death sentence on treason, espionage and defection. Enacted in 1949 when the
Kuomintang just fled to Taiwan, this law was applicable to both military and common courts and played an important role during the white terror period. Related information about some people executed according to this law was not publicized because they werecourt-martial led. For example,Bo Yang andShih Ming-teh were both sentenced to death by this law, however they were finally givenlife imprisonment due to worldwide political pressure during trial.*Act for the Control and Punishment of Banditry (, rescinded in January 2002 [ [http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/NewsDetail.asp?no=1C0000005 法規 ] ] ) which ruled mandatory death penalty on kidnapping, piracy, or robbery along with murder, rape, or arson. Originally enacted as a short-term special law by the Kuomintang government during the
Second Sino-Japanese War period, the law was extended for long time due to all sorts of accidental mishaps.Execution process
A ROC judicial execution requires the final sentence from the
Supreme Court of the Republic of China and the death order signed by the Minister of Justice. After the Supreme Court issues a final death sentence, the case will soon be transferred to the Ministry of Justice, waiting for the Minister of Justice to rule a final secret execution date. Generally the Ministry of Justice will allow some time for the condemned person to meet his or her family, arrange religious activities, and even get married before the execution. Should any new evidence or procedural flaw which may influence the verdict is discovered during this period, the condemned prisoner may plea to the Ministry of Justice, which may then delay the death warrant, if or when the Solicitor General of Supreme Prosecutors' Office makes a special appeal to Supreme Court for retrial. However such cases are very rare: to date only one condemned prisoner finally escaped the judicial death in this way. [ [http://www.jrf.org.tw/newjrf/RTE/myform_detail.asp?id=1448 財團法人民間司法改革基金會 Judicial Reform Foundation ] ] ThePresident of Republic of China can also awardclemency , but so far only PresidentChiang Kai-Shek ever exercised this legal right on an individual prisoner once in 1957. [http://www.deathpenalty.org.tw/read.php?id=46&class=10] PresidentLee Teng-hui also ruled out two nationwide commutations in 1988 [ [http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Newsdetail.asp?NO=1C0010017 法規 ] ] and 1991 [ [http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Newsdetail.asp?NO=1C0010018 法規 ] ] in which two sentences were commuted from death tolife imprisonment .The death order from the Minister of Justice will be received and performed by High Prosecutors' offices so executions are carried out inside the
detention center s of the five cities having High Court:Taipei ,Taichung , Tainan,Kaohsiung andHualien . Like Japan, Taiwanesedeath row inmates are kept in detention centers but not prisons, and are kept under harsher conditions than general prisoners. They are imprisoned every 2 persons per cell (or sole imprisonment for misbehaving or very violent inmates),handcuff ed andfetter ed all day long (although since late 2006 the Ministry of Justice is experimenting with unfettering death row inmates who behave themselves), only allowed to leave the cell half an hour a day for exercise, but are allowed to read censored newspapers and books as well as practice religious activities with permitted religious personnel.Executions are carried out by
handgun shooting aimed at theheart from the back, or aimed at thebrain stem under theear if the prisoner consents toorgan donation . The execution time used to be 6AM, but was changed to 9PM in 1995 to reduce officials' workload. Executions are performed in secret: nobody will be informed beforehand, including the condemned. Before the execution alast meal will be served and the prisoner will be prompted for anylast words . The condemned prisoner will then be injected with stronganaesthetic to leave him or her completely senseless, and the shooting quickly takes the prisoner's life. After execution the High Prosecutors' Office in charge will announce the execution in detail. Although the Ministry of Justice has studied other methods includinghanging andlethal injection since early 1990s, execution by shooting (performed by localbailiff s ormilitary police men) is the only execution method used in Taiwan to date (including military executions).ROC military sentences and executions are administered only by the Ministry of National Defense and have no connection with the Ministry of Justice. Military sentences and executions are carried out in the military courts and prisons across the island as well as
Penghu ,Kinmen and Matsu. Unlike the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of National Defense does not compile detailed information concerning this issue so the real situation is unclear.Execution statistics
Unlike Singapore, ROC's Ministry of Justice annually publishes detailed statistics on this year's executions, including the executed person's name, age, sex, crime, nationality, education, etc. The detailed numbers of executions since 1987 are listed below [ [http://www.jrf.org.tw/mag/mag_02s2.asp?SN=1104 司改會著作.法案-司改雜誌-政策宣示三年 實際作為形同牛步 廢除死刑不該只是口號 ] ] [http://www.deathpenalty.org.tw/read.php?id=99&class=40] :
The execution tally was at its height in late 1980s and early 1990s when the martial law was just lifted and the social order suddenly disintegrated. The strict Act for the Control and Punishment of Banditry took many prisoners' lives at that time.
Among the executed were a small number from the
People's Republic of China , thePhilippines ,Thailand ,Malaysia andSingapore . They were executed in Taiwan for kidnapping, murder, or drug trafficking offenses [http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8F%8D%E5%85%B1%E7%BE%A9%E5%A3%AB] [ [http://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/p03_01_printpage.asp?expno=263 大法官解釋_友善列印 ] ] [ [http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/8/11/n118390.htm 卓長仁,姜洪軍昨槍決 高喊「中華民國萬歲」 ] ] .Controversial death sentences
There are accounts in which the organs were retrieved from the executed prisoners while they were still medically alive. [ [http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/3/2/n53185.htm 台灣死囚捐器官擬放寬 神經學會反彈 ] ] [ [http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2002/new/dec/3/today-c7.htm 綜合新聞 ] ] Torture also exists in the investigation process, and seriously compromises the credibility of the verdicts. [ [http://web.amnesty.org/report2004/twn-summary-eng Amnesty International | Working to Protect Human Rights ] ]
The Hsichih Trio case
In March 1991 a Hsichih couple Wu Ming-han (吳銘漢) and Yeh Ying-lan (葉盈蘭) were found robbed and brutally murdered inside their apartment. In August 1991 the police seized their neighbor Wang Wen-hsiao (王文孝), a youngster who was then serving in the
ROC Marines Corps, based on a Wang's bloodyfingerprint found at the scene. Wang confessed to the murder after they discovered his housebreaking andburglary , but the police doubted how he alone could have killed two adults so easily and brutally. After torture Wang confessed another three 1972-born youngsters who lived in the same community, Su Chien-ho (蘇建和), Chuang Lin-hsun (莊林勳) and Liu Bin-lang (劉秉郎) asaccomplice s. These four young men further confessed theygang rape d Yeh Ying-lan during their action, but theautopsy after murder did not check Yeh's genitals because her body was badly wounded and by the time they were seized, Yeh's body was already buried and decomposed.Wang Wen-hsiao was
court-martial ed and speedily executed in January 1992. The other threedefendant s were prosecuted by the "Act for the Control and Punishment of Banditry" which ruled compulsory death penalty for their crimes, if found guilty. During trial the defendants repeatedly claimed they were forced to make fake confessions under torture and they were not guilty, but the judges did not believe them.In February 1995 the
Supreme Court of the Republic of China condemned the defendants to death. Originally, the three would have been shot within short time, but then Minister of JusticeMa Ying-jeou refused to sign their death warrants and returned the whole case back to Supreme Court in hope of a retrial, due to shortcomings such as:*The only two pieces of evidence to prove the defendants' guilt was Wang Wen-hsiao's confessions and the
NT$ 24 dollars found in Chuang Lin-hsun's home which was consideredbooty . The evidence was too weak: Wang Wen-hsiao was executed too early to witness the case, and NT$ 24 dollars was a tiny amount.
*All four defendants claimed they have been tortured without lawyer present during police interrogation, but the judges did not investigate this point thoroughly. Wang Wen-hsiao's brother Wang Wen-chung (王文忠) even claimed Hsichih police originally asked his brother to confess as an accomplice, but he had refused.
*There was no way to prove if Yeh Ying-lan was raped.Between 1995 and 2000 Ma Ying-jeou and his 3 successors filed several retrial requests to the Supreme Court, but all of them were rejected. Meantime this case drew the attention of
Amnesty International and was widely broadcast throughout the world, nicknamed as "the Hsichih Trio" [ [http://www.tahr.org.tw/site/english/sjh.html The Case of Su Chien-ho, Liu Bin-lang, and Chuang Lin-hsun ] ] .After long time effort the Supreme Court finally ruled out a retrial on
May 19 ,2000 , just one day before former PresidentChen Shui-bian 's inauguration. InJanuary 13 ,2003 Taiwan High Court passed a verdict that they were not guilty and released them, but the victims' families were unwilling to accept this and kept onappeal ing. OnJune 29 ,2007 the Taiwan High Court once again found the trio guilty and condemned them to death, but surprisingly did not put them into custody because "the 3 defendants are already worldwide famous and will be identified in any place", the first such case in the ROC history. The case remains unsettled.Lu Cheng's case
Tainan native Lu Cheng (盧正), an unemployed former policeman, was charged with the kidnapping and murder of a local woman Chan Chun-tzu(詹春子) who along with her husband were both Lu's high school classmates in December 1997. The Supreme Court of the Republic of China condemned Lu to death in June 2000 but Lu's family pointed out several suspicious points [ [http://www.jrf.org.tw/reform/file_4_4a.htm 司改會觀察監督-檔案追蹤-890802盧正案新聞稿 ] ] :
*Like the Hsichih Trio, Lu Cheng was tortured by police for a long period and was forced to provide fake confessions.
*The judges intentionally ignored an apparentalibi that Lu Cheng was together with his juvenile niece at the exact time of the murder.
*The real kidnapper phoned the victim's husband during the crime. If Lu Cheng had committed the kidnapping, the victim's husband should have been able to identify Lu's voice.
*The verdict stated that the victim was strangled to death by Lu Cheng's shoelaces. However theautopsy showed the victim's strangulation burn did not match Lu's shoelaces.Despite these suspicious points, then Minister of Justice
Chen Ding-nan still gave order to Lu Cheng's execution onSeptember 7 2000 , just one day before that year'sMid-Autumn Festival . It was rumored that Lu Cheng remained sober after receiving five anesthetic injections at 3AM so the officials had to shoot him while he was conscious, and his eyes remained opened after his death, a sign of injustice according to Chinese tradition. Lu Cheng's family kept on protesting but there has been no concrete official response to date.Former President Chen Shui-bian's policy towards abolishing death penalty
These controversial cases apparently influenced the local judicial system. Chen Ding-nan publicly announced his intention to abolish the death penalty in May 2001 [ [http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/5/17/n89550.htm 陳定南將全力推動廢除死刑 ] ] and his views were further backed by President
Chen Shui-bian [ [http://www.epochtimes.com.au/b5/6/6/14/n1351147.htm 陳水扁:廢除死刑 台灣努力目標 ] ] [http://www.gov.tw/EBOOKS/TWANNUAL/show_book.php?path=8_012_027] .Although the right to abolish death penalty is held on theLegislative Yuan which is dominated by the opposingPan-blue coalition , as well as being more conservative on this issue, theDemocratic Progressive Party government informally gave amoratorium by not signing death warrants except for serious and noncontroversial significant cases. As a result, the number of executions have dropped significantly since 2002. In an October 2006 interview, Chen Ding-nan's successor Shih Mao-lin (施茂林) said he would not sign anydeath warrant for the 19 defendants who were already condemned to death by Supreme Court in near future, because their cases were still being reviewed inside the Ministry [http://news.sina.com.tw/society/udn/tw/2006-10-12/015212130360.shtml] .These conditions may remain in effect until Chen Shui-bian's tenure expires onMay 20 ,2008 .Arguing for and against the death penalty
Actress
Pai Ping-ping advocated in favor of retaining the death penalty after the murder of her daughter,Pai Hsiao-yen ." [http://www.chinapost.com.tw/editorial/taiwan%20issues/2008/04/25/153494/Taiwan-must.htm Taiwan must not abolish its death penalty] ." "China Post ".]References
External links
* [http://www.moj.gov.tw The Ministry of Justice of the Republic of China]
* [http://www.judicial.gov.tw The Judicial Yuan of the Republic of China]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.