- Judgment in Berlin
"Judgment in Berlin" is a 1984 book by
federal judge Herbert Jay Stern about a hijacking trial in theUnited States Court forBerlin in 1979, over which he presided.From the end of
World War II in Europe in May 1945 until the reunification ofGermany in October 1990, Berlin was divided into four sectors: the American Sector, the French Sector, the British Sector, and the Soviet Sector, each named after the occupying power. The Soviet sector, informally calledEast Berlin , was effectively governed as a part ofEast Germany , then a member of theWarsaw Pact , and the American, French, and British Sectors, collectively calledWest Berlin , were effectively governed as parts ofWest Germany , a member ofNATO . Seldom did the American government exercise power directly in the American sector, except as it affected American military forces stationed in Berlin. In particular, the judgeship of the United States Court for Berlin was vacant except during the trial over which Judge Stern presided.In 1978, after prodigious diplomatic efforts,
NATO had convinced theWarsaw Pact states to sign an international convention on hijacking, in which each signatory state promised to punish hijackers who land in their territory. On30 August 1978, Hans Detlef Alexander Tiede and Ingrid Ruske, both East Germans, used astarting pistol (not an actual gun) to hijack a Polish passenger aircraft fromGdansk bound for East Berlin'sSchönefeld Airport and diverted it instead to theU.S. Air Force base at Tempelhof Airport in West Berlin. The West German government was very reluctant to prosecute Tiede and Ruske because of the West German policy of supporting the right of East Germans to flee oppression in theGDR . However, the NATO members did not want to lose the hijacking treaty on which they had worked for so long. Consequently the case was prosecuted in the never-before-convened United States Court for Berlin.Over the prosecutor's objections, Judge Stern ruled that the defendants were entitled to be tried by a jury, a procedure abolished in Germany in 1924. The case against Tiede's co-defendant Ingrid Ruske was dismissed because she had not been notified of her
Miranda rights before signing a confession. Tiede was acquitted on three charges, including hijacking and possession of a firearm, but convicted of taking a hostage. He was sentenced to time served — about nine months.A significant subtext in the book is Judge Stern's refusal to accept assertions made by representatives of the
United States Department of State that, as the authority appointing the judge for the United States Court for Berlin, it also had the right to control the Judge's decision, i.e., tell Stern what to decide. The "time served" sentence, writes Stern, was the only method by which he could protect Tiede from theState Department .In 1988, Judge Stern's book became the basis of a movie with the same name starring
Martin Sheen andSean Penn .External links
*imdb title|id=0095415|title=Judgment in Berlin
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.