- Parnall
Parnall was a British
aircraft manufacturer .History
Parnall and Sons of Mivart Street,
Eastville, Bristol was a wood-working firm in the period before theFirst World War . The demands of wartime aircraft production meant that many woodworking companies were contracted to build aircraft. Parnall received large orders from theAdmiralty to build aircraft designed by other manufacturers, principally theAvro 504 andShort Admiralty Type 827 (of which 20 were built).The company split in two in 1921, when
George Geach Parnall left the company and formed George Parnall & Co. Ltd., the original companyParnall & Sons moving toFishponds , Bristol, in 1923 to continue production of shop-fittings and aircraft components. In 1936 Parnall joined withHendy Aircraft andNash and Thompson to form Parnall Aircraft Ltd. In 1939 they stopped aircraft production to concentrate on aircraft components, particularlygun turret s.Aircraft
cout
The quality of workmanship and their enthusiasm for aircraft production was noted and so in 1916 they were approached for a design of their own to meet a requirement for a coastal defence aircraft. At that time the principal threat to Britain was seen as
Zeppelin attacks and a specially designed fighter was sought to counter this threat.Parnall's first aircraft, designed by
A. Camden Pratt was called the Scout, a large single-seater, two-baybiplane powered by a 230 hpSunbeam Maori , with an upward-firing gun mounted on the upper wing. It acquired nicknames including "Zeppelin Chaser" and "Zepp Straffer" but the design was not a success as it was too heavy; it is believed that only two flights were made.Panther
A batch of
Fairey Hamble Babies were built and then another enquiry came in for a shipboard reconnaissance plane. For this work theAdmiralty released the services ofHarold Bolas , an engineer who had been instrumental in designing flying-boat hulls. Bolas's first design for Parnall was the Panther; among its notable features was abirch plywood monocoque fuselage with the pilot and observer placed high, offering them an all-round view. The fuselage was hinged for shipboard stowage; forditching the plane had a hydrovane ahead of theundercarriage as well as air-bag floatation gear. Tests in 1918 were disappointing as performance was only marginally better than theSopwith 1½ Strutter which it was designed to replace, and only 312 aircraft were ordered from the firm.Around this time Parnall and Sons was acquired by W. & T. Avery Ltd. who considered prospects in the aircraft industry poor with the ending of hostilities. An attempt by the Admiralty to reduce the order led to a disagreement with the result that Parnall ceased aircraft manufacture and production passed to Filton where 150 were built during 1919 and 1920. In service the aircraft performed well being described as delightful to fly with none of the vices associated with large rotary engines, however deck landings on ships were hazardous in this period and the accident rate was high. Late production Panthers were fitted with oleo undercarriage and remained in service until 1926. Two aircraft were acquired by the
US Navy and 12 were supplied to Japan.Puffin
Despite this setback, the name Parnall was to reappear when George Geach Parnall formed a new company, George Parnall & Co. Ltd. with a handful of previous employees and opened the Coliseum Works in Park Row, Bristol in 1921. The first design, also by Bolas, was another naval aircraft: the Puffin. This was a large two seat, two bay amphibious biplane powered by a 450 hp
Napier Lion engine. The fuselage was mounted above a large central float which contained wheels that could be lowered through a vertical slot, large out-rigger floats were fitted on the lower planes. The observer was equipped with aScarff ring and had an uninterrupted field of fire as the fin and rudder were mounted beneath the fuselage. Three prototypes were built but production was not proceeded with.Plover
More successful was Bolas's next design, the Plover
naval fighter , a single bay wooden biplane powered by one 436hp Bristol Jupiter IV engine. With the pilot placed high for a good view over the short nose and close-cowled radial engine, it could almost have come from the Filton drawing boards. Amphibious wheeled floats were tested and one was fitted with anArmstrong Siddeley Jaguar radial. The Plover had a good performance but only six were built for service in 1923; the Royal Navy preferring theFairey Flycatcher despite its lower speed. One Plover was entered in the 1926King's Cup Air Race but failed to finish.Possum
Centrally-mounted engines powering wing-mounted airscrews was a concept that was explored with the large four-engined
Bristol Tramp , the twin-enginedBoulton Paul Bodmin and the next design to emerge from Parnall, the single engined "Possum". Both the Tramp and the Possum were triplanes with twin tractor airscrews driven by shafts from the fuselage. The Possum was officially described as a "postal aircraft" - a curious designation for an aircraft having gun positions in the nose and amidships. The centrally-located 450hp Napier Lion engine had side mounted radiators which could be retracted in flight to achieve additional streamlining. The Possum fared rather better than the Tramp, which never flew, and performed well, making a public appearance at the 1923Hendon Pageant. Despite having proved the practicality of its layout it was regarded as something of a curiosity by the pilots that flew it from Martlesham Heath inSuffolk . Experience revealed insufficient advantages to support any further development of this concept.Pixie
In 1923 the "
Daily Mail " and theDuke of Sutherland sponsored competitions designed to stimulate light aircraft development; Parnall entered a single seat low wing monoplane, the "Pixie", built in two forms with 13hp and 26hp Douglas engines. The Pixie won the £500 Abdulla Company prize for speed. The aircraft produced for the 1923Lympne Trials were unrealistic machines being too lightly-powered to be flown in even modest winds and in 1924 the Air Council announced another competition for higher powered two seaters. Bolas revised the Pixie to produce both amonoplane and a biplane with an upper wing called the Pixie III and Pixie IIIA respectively. Both were powered by 32hp Bristol Cherub III engines. Neither Pixie was successful in competition as both suffered forced-landings with engine trouble. The Pixie III was entered again in the 1926 Lympne Trials and finished fourth.Parnall Pixie IIIa G-EBJG is still in existence with the
Midland Air Museum , Coventry, England. The remains are in deep store and are not generally on view to the public without prior arrangement.Perch
Naval interest continued with Bolas' next design, the "Perch" fleet aircraft trainer. This was a dual role machine that could be used for training pilots in deck-landing techniques or, when fitted with floats, as a seaplane trainer. The aircraft was an equal-span biplane that featured side-by-side seating and a 220hp
Rolls-Royce Falcon engine set low in the nose to give the pilot an excellent view for landing. The Perch performed well but no production order was made.Gyroplane
In 1928 the
Cierva Autogyro Company contracted Parnall to design and build two machines to be designated C10 and C11 in the Cierva series, the C11 was later called the Parnall Gyroplane. The airframes were designed by Harold Bolas, the C10 was powered by anArmstrong Siddeley Genet while the C11 used a 120hp Airdisco. The C10 turned over on take-off at the airfield inYate and was taken toHamble for repair at which time it was modified to incorporate an engine-driven rotor-starting device. During these projects he worked with the inventor of autogyro,Juan de la Cierva .Peto
The "Peto" submarine-launched floatplane was amongst the most technically difficult tasks that Parnall took on. It was a two-seat reconnaissance float-biplane of very small overall dimensions designed to be folded and carried in the confines of a
submarine . Of mixed wood, fabric, aluminium and steel construction, it had unequal span, warren-braced rectangular wings and the first aircraft was powered by a 128hpBristol Lucifer engine and hadmahogany plywood "Consuta" type floats. Performance on test was generally satisfactory but modifications were put in hand and the machine was rebuilt with new wings, metal floats and a 169hp AS Mongoose engine. Tests both on the sea and in the air showed that Bolas had fully met the requirements and it was officially judged to be exceptionally good; it was successfully launched by catapult from the ill-fated submarine "M2" but the concept of submarine-carried aircraft died in theRoyal Navy after the loss of the "M2" which took one of the Petos with it.By the mid
1920s it was clear that an aircraft factory in the middle of a town was less than satisfactory where test flying was concerned, some of the aircraft having made their first flights from Filton. Accordingly a move was made toYate , then inGloucestershire , where hangars were built beside a grass aerodrome. Rumour has it that money was so tight that George would only allow a central strip for the runway to be mowed as he needed the profit from the hay crop! New aircraft continued to emerge at a steady rate and Harold Bolas designed two further naval types, the Pike and the Pipit.Pike
The "Pike" was a large three-seater reconnaissance float-biplane powered by a 471hp Napier Lion. The deep and narrow fuselage filled the gap between the back-staggered wings; the pilot's cockpit was located near the nose affording an excellent view. Defence was provided by a Scarf-mounted
Lewis gun in the observer's cockpit at the upper wing trailing edge while the pilot had a forward-firingVickers gun. Trials of the single prototype were carried out at Felixstowe during 1927 but the report was unfavourable; the handling in flight was considered poor, the pilot's cockpit was criticised for being cold and draughty and performance generally below specification. Neither the Pike nor its rival, the Short Sturgeon, were developed further.Pipit
The "Pipit" was an aircraft of a very different character, a fleet fighter biplane of very clean appearance, designed to specification 21/26 and powered by a 495 hp Rolls-Royce F.XI. Of metal construction with fabric covering, the Pipit had a number of innovative features including detachable panels giving easy access to the fuselage, a wide-track undercarriage and a retractable radiator.
Two prototypes were ordered, the first flying from Yate in mid 1928. Despite its promising appearance and engineering novelty the Pipit did not fly as well as expected, the elevator being criticised as heavy while the rudder was weak and the type was longitudinally unstable. Before much development flying could be done, however, the
tailplane failed due to flutter in a diving test on 20 September. The pilot landed the damaged aircraft but it was destroyed in the resulting somersault. The pilot sustained serious injuries.A second modified machine was built, powered by a Rolls-Royce F.XIIS, featuring a strut-braced tailplane, rigidly linked ailerons and a large elliptical horn balanced fin and rudder assembly designed to improve its effectiveness. It first flew in January 1929 and was an improvement over the earlier machine but the rudder was still unsatisfactory. On February 24 a test was made by a service test pilot; whilst investigating the rudder's properties in a series of dives, violent flutter developed and both the fin and rudder broke away. The machine became uncontrollable but luckily the pilot escaped by parachute below 1000 ft. It was the end for the Pipit and the incident left a stigma in official circles from which Parnall never really recovered.
Imp
Harold Bolas always maintained an interest in light aircraft and in 1927 produced a small, two-seater biplane: the "Imp". Powered initially by an uncowled
Armstrong Siddeley Genet II of 80hp, it was of striking appearance as it had a straight lower wing joined by wide chord struts without bracing wires to sharply swept upper wings. With the engine installation cleaned up, front cockpit faired over and a headrest fitted it flew into 8th place in the 1928 King's Cup race. At that time Parnall had thoughts of going into engine manufacture and collaborated with D.R.Pobjoy in the development of the 65hpPobjoy P air-cooled radial engine. This was test flown in the Imp, but Pobjoy decided to form his own company and his collaboration with Parnall ceased.Elf
The attractive "Elf" was Bolas's last design for Parnall. It was a two-seater, touring biplane in the
de Havilland Moth class using fabric-covered wooden construction and powered by an ADC Hermes I. It flew for the first time in 1929. A naval influence showed as it used Warren girder bracing with folding wings. A competent if somewhat uninspired performer, the prototype was sold toLord Apsley in 1932 but it was destroyed in a crash in 1934. Two more were built as Elf IIs with ADC Hermes II engines. One, sold in 1933, crashed due to fuel-pump failure two months later but the second went to Lord Apsley as a replacement for the crashed Elf I.In 1929 Harold Bolas, after some twelve years of trying to produce a winner for Parnalls, finally decided to leave for the USA. An enthusiastic and respected designer, he was highly regarded for the originality of his designs and was a skillful theoretician. He was not above test flying his own creations, suitably fortified after a visit to the nearby Railway Inn pub. One of his Elf biplanes survives to this day with the
Shuttleworth Trust , occasionally flying atOld Warden inBedfordshire .Prawn & Parasol
Bolas was succeeded by H.V. Clark who produced two interesting research aircraft, each built to test a specific aspect. The first was the "Prawn", a small single-engined, single-seater parasol flying-boat powered by a 65 hp
Ricardo -Burt engine. It was designed to assess the feasibility of mounting a flying boat's engine in the extreme bow thereby producing a low drag installation. To make this feasible a very small four bladed propeller was needed and the engine could be tilted up to 22 degrees upwards to avoid the spray over the nose. It never was a very practical idea and it seems that little was done with it.More useful was the "Parasol" of which two were built. This machine was a flying full scale aerodynamic test vehicle, it could test the effects seen in
wind-tunnel tests but without the effects of scale inherent in a tunnel. It was a two-seater, the observer occupying the front cockpit which was equipped with a dynamometer for measuring flight-loads on the variable incidence wings which featured slots, flaps and separated ailerons. To eliminate the effects of the propeller, theArmstrong Siddeley Lynx engine could be stopped in flight for gliding then restarted with a gas starter. A camera could be mounted on struts above the tailplane and this was used for photographing tufts ofwool that showed the airflow patterns over the wings.G.4/31
The inter-war years produced a series of requirements for "general purpose" aircraft; in those miserly times this was a cheap way of providing the Air Force with aircraft that, it was hoped, would be of some general use if hostilities arose.
Air Ministry Specification G.4/31 was no exception. Conceived as a replacement for theWestland Wapiti andFairey Gordon it initially called for day and night bombing capabilities, reconnaissance, torpedo and dive-bombing roles. Designs came from Handley Page,Vickers ,Fairey ,Armstrong Whitworth and Parnall with what was to be the final expressly military type, the un-named type G.4/31. This was a large angular biplane with gull-type upper wings, wheel spats, a good collection of interplane and fuselage struts and very generous tail surfaces. Power came from a 690 hp Bristol Pegasus I M3 in aTownend ring , there was a forward-firing gun for the pilot and the observer had a Scarf-mountedLewis gun . Flight tests were carried out during 1935 from Yate. It is believed the aircraft had handling problems for it was not delivered to Martlesham Heath until early in 1936, long after the competition had been decided in favour of theVickers Type 253 . The machine was used for armament trials until March 1937 when it was damaged in a crash and subsequently scrapped.Heck
In 1929 Parnall built a cabin monoplane called the "Hendy 302" to the design of
Basil B. Henderson who followed it with another monoplane, the advanced "Heck". 1935 marked a major change for Parnall when the firm acquired the assets of bothHendy Aircraft Ltd. and the armaments firm of Nash and Thompson. A new company called Parnall Aircraft was formed and the Heck passed to Parnall ownership, renamed theParnall Heck it set a new record for the run fromCape Town to England of 6 days, 8 hours and 27 minutes in November 1936. A three seat derivative with a fixed, spatted undercarriage, powered by a Gypsy Six was produced as the Parnall Heck 2C, six were built in expectation of sales but none were sold and the first four were therefore used as communications aircraft by Parnall in connection with their armaments activities. The fifth and sixth aircraft were used for test-flying theWolseley Aries radial engine andgun sight development work.The final Parnall aircraft was an open two-seater trainer derivative of the Heck to specification T.1/37 called the Parnall 382 or the Heck 3. It featured the Heck's advanced wing and had a speed range of 139 mph to 43 mph; it first flew in 1939. At Martlesham Heath it was pleasant to fly assessed as generally good as a trainer. Notwithstanding a few modifications no order was forthcoming. It was to be the last Parnall machine to fly, after which Parnall turned his attention to producing aircraft
gun turret s to ArchieFrazer Nash 's design in the Yate factory until the war ended.Washing machines
Thereafter Parnall became a through its
washing machine s and later the Jackson range of cookers.References
* [http://www.britishaircraft.co.uk/companypage.php?ID=22 British aircraft directory]
* [http://weldgen.tripod.com/id98.html Histories of Bristol companies - Parnell of Yate]ee also
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.