- Stars and Stripes trilogy
"The Stars and Stripes Trilogy" is a collection of three
alternate history novels written byHarry Harrison .etting
All three books work supposedly around the POD (Point of Divergence) of British involvement in the
American Civil War after theTrent Affair . This happens when Prince Albert dies prematurely rather than playing his historic role in resolving the crisis. The Queen blames the Americans. She authorizes her ministers to do anything necessary to ensure that they pay for it.There is another unexplained difference - the Duke of Wellington is still alive, though he remarks he has been 'living on borrowed time' since his illness in 1852. In our world, 1852 was the date of his death. This seems to date the PoD to before 1852, without the
Butterfly Effect changing intermediate occurrences, such as the course of theCrimean War .Historical accuracy
The series has been heavily criticised mainly for errors found throughout the story and its heavy favoritism to America. Others consider action occurring in the story to be unrealistic with the
Royal Navy acting as chronically bad navigators, Mexican guerillas defeatingGurkhas in close combat, the United States and Confederate States easily making peace, characters adopting latetwentieth century attitudes towards race, to the United States being able to easily taking the war to theBritish Isles .It is true that the "The Stars and Bars" was mistaken for the US flag in battle, and that uniforms were often mixed. But Confederates would surely have questions why red-coated British troops were attacking them when they were supposed to be allies. Confusions mostly happen when both units think they are fighting the actual enemy.
It was also normal at the time to demand a surrender before starting the fight, which again would have revealed the error with no great harm done. And even if they fought the wrong troops, invading Britons should have regarded
Biloxi, Mississippi as friendly territory and have supposed that they were freeing it from Union occupation.Factual errors include
Texas being described as having no slaves while it was a major proponent for slavery. And misquotingGeneral Lee about his famous quote about war being terrible.William Tecumseh Sherman is also shown as being a staunchabolitionist when in fact Sherman wasracist and had no problems withslavery .Fact|date=June 2007Colored units are fighting as part of the Union army in 1861. Though they had fought in the War of Independence, they were refused when the first volunteer units were formed in the North. Only in July 1862 did Congress pass two acts allowing the enlistment of African Americans. (See
Military history of African Americans .)In the alternate history,
John Stuart Mill comes to the USA to advise on the abolition of slavery. Some of what he wrote on the subject is quoted. His more anti-Confederate remarks are not. He said::Secession may be laudable, and so may any other kind of insurrection; but it may also be an enormous crime. It is the one or the other, according to the object and the provocation. And if there ever was an object which, by its bare announcement, stamped rebels against a particular community as enemies of mankind, it is the one professed by the South. (Mill, "The Contest in America".)
Harrison also uses Mill to heavily plagiarize
Robert Heilbroner 's economic work,The Worldly Philosophers . Mill's exposition to Lincoln regarding the contemporary social and economic status of Europe is taken almost word for word from chapter 6, "The Inexorable System of Karl Marx," in Heilbroner's book.The books have shown sloppy research in historical matters and on the conduct of
War fare around the period. [See External links, below]In one of the alternate-history campaigns, Grant goes back the way he came after learning of a strong enemy force ahead. The real General Grant never retreated, looking for a way round when he could not go forward. His autobiography describes how he had aversion to retracing his steps even as a child. [*Grant, Ulysses S., [http://www.gutenberg.net/etext/4367 "Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant"] ]
Later, Grant is seen fighting at the front line and leading his troops. Civil War generals very seldom did that: it was the job of captains and maybe colonels. Generals stayed behind the lines and coordinated the battle, occasionally going to the front to observe or encourage. Even this cost lives that made a difference to the war:
Stonewall Jackson was accidentally shot by his own men while observing,Albert Sidney Johnston was killed by the enemy while encouraging his troops at the battle of Shiloh.Books
*Stars and Stripes Forever (1998)
*Stars and Stripes in Peril (2000)
*Stars and Stripes Triumphant (2002)ee also
*
Stars and Stripes Forever (disambiguation)
*"Tunnel Through the Deeps " - another alternate-history novel by Harrison
*"A Rebel In Time " - another novel by Harrison set in the American Civil WarReferences
External links
*" [http://www.geocities.com/littlegreenmen.geo/SASF.htm Military errors] " - criticism of the book at [http://www.geocities.com/littlegreenmen.geo/ Bryn Monnerys Frontpage] . Also includes details of how to use for
Wargaming .
*" [http://www.wideopenwest.com/~jenkins/ironclads/ssreview.htm A Naval Review] " - another criticism of the book, at " [http://www.wideopenwest.com/~jenkins/ironclads/ironclad.htm Ironclads and Blockade Runners Of the American Civil War] "
*" [http://www.wargames.co.uk/RandomS/Library/Warrior.htm Warrior Vs Monitor] " - a look at what would have really happened if Monitor fought Warrior at [http://www.wargames.co.uk/RandomS/Library/Warrior.htm] .
* [http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/5123 "The Contest in America"] byJohn Stuart Mill - a small download
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.