- SOS response
The SOS response is a postreplication
DNA repairsystem that allows DNA replicationto bypass lesions or errors in the DNA. The SOS uses the RecAprotein. The RecA protein, stimulated by single-stranded DNA, is involved in the inactivation of the LexArepressor thereby inducing the response. It is an error prone repair system.
During normal growth, the SOS genes are negatively regulated by LexA
repressor proteindimers. Under normal conditions, LexA binds to a 20-bp consensus sequence (the SOS box) in the operator region for those genes. Some of these SOS genes are expressed at certain levels even in the repressed state, according to the affinity of LexA for their SOS box. Activation of the SOS genes occurs after DNA damage by the accumulation of single stranded (ssDNA) regions generated at replication forks, where DNA polymeraseis blocked. RecA forms a filament around these ssDNA regions in an ATP-dependent fashion, and becomes activated. The activated form of RecA interacts with the LexA repressor to facilitate the LexA repressor's self-cleavage from the operator [Nelson, David L., and Michael M. Cox. Lehninger: Principles of Biochemistry 4th Edition. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 2005. page 1098.] .
Once the pool of LexA decreases, repression of the SOS genes goes down according to the level of LexA affinity for the SOS boxes. Operators that bind LexA weakly are the first to be fully expressed. In this way LexA can sequentially activate different mechanisms of repair. Genes having a weak SOS box (such as lexA, recA, uvrA, uvrB, and uvrD) are fully induced in response to even weak SOS-inducing treatments. Thus the first SOS repair mechanism to be induced is
nucleotide excision repair(NER), whose aim is to fix DNA damage without commitment to a full-fledged SOS response.
If, however, NER does not suffice to fix the damage, the LexA concentration is further reduced, so the expression of genes with stronger LexA boxes (such as sulA, umuD, umuC - these are expressed late) is induced. SulA stops
cell divisionby binding to FtsZ, the initiating protein in this process. This causes filamentation, and the induction of UmuDC-dependent mutagenic repair. As a result of these properties, some genes may be partially induced in response to even endogenous levels of DNA damage, while other genes appear to be induced only when high or persistent DNA damage is present in the cell.
The SOS response was discovered and named by
Miroslav Radmanin 1974. [Radman, M. 1974. Phenomenology of an inducible mutagenic DNA repair pathway in Escherichia coli: SOS repair hypothesis, p. 128-142. In L. Prokash, F. Sherman, M. Miller, C. Lawrence, and H. W. Tabor (ed.), Molecular and environmental aspects of mutagenesis. Charles C Thomas Publisher, Springfield, Ill]
Recent research has shown that the SOS pathway may be essential in the acquisition of bacterial mutations which lead to
antibiotic resistance. [ "Inhibition of Mutation and Combating the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance" Ryan T. Cirz, Jodie K. Chin, David R. Andes, Valérie de Crécy-Lagard, William A. Craig, Floyd E. Romesberg Plos Biology Volume 3, Issue 6, June 2005. [http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0030176] ] Researchers are now targeting these proteins with the hopes of creating drugs that prevent SOS repair which may increase the efficacy of antibiotics. ["A Molecular Target for Suppression of the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance: Inhibition of the Escherichia coli RecA Protein by N6-(1-Naphthyl)-ADP" Andrew M. Lee, Christian T. Ross, Bu-Bing Zeng, and Scott F. Singleton. J. Med. Chem., 48 (17), 5408 -5411, 2005. [http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/abstract.cgi/jmcmar/2005/48/i17/abs/jm050113z.html] ]
The SOS Response of "
(This link doesn't work anymore...)
Induction of lysis in lambda phage
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.