A kolkhoz (audio-ru|колхо́з|ru-kolkhoz.ogg, IPA-ru|kɐlˈxos), plural "kolkhozy", was a form of
collective farmingin the Soviet Unionthat existed along with state farms ( sovkhoz, plural "sovkhozy"). The word is a contraction of "коллекти́вное хозя́йство", or "collective farm", while sovkhoz is a contraction of "советское хозяйство" (literally, "Soviet farm"). Kolkhozy and sovkhozy were the two components of the so-called "socialized farm sector" that began to emerge in Soviet agriculture after the October Revolutionof 1917 as an antithesis to individual or family farming. The 1920s were characterized by spontaneous and apparently voluntary emergence of collective farms, which included an updated version of the traditional Russian “commune”, the generic “farming association” ("zemledel’cheskaya artel’"), the association for joint cultivation of land(TOZ), and finally the kolkhoz. This peaceful and gradual shift to collective farming in the first 15 years after the October Revolution turned into a violent stampede during the forced collectivization campaign that began in 1928.
Kolkhoz as a pseudo-cooperative
Being a collective farm, a kolkhoz was legally organized as a production cooperative. The Standard Charter of a kolkhoz, which since the early 1930s had the force of law in the USSR, is a model of cooperative principles in print. It speaks of the kolkhoz as a “form of agricultural production cooperative of peasants that voluntarily unite for the purpose of joint agricultural production based on ... collective labor.” It asserts that “the kolkhoz is managed according to the principles of socialist self-management, democracy, and openness, with active participation of the members in decisions concerning all aspects of internal life”. ["Standard Kolkhoz Charter", Agropromizdat, Moscow (1989), pp. 4,37 (Russian).]
Yet in practice, the collective farm that emerged after Stalin’s collectivization campaign did not have many characteristics of a true cooperative, except joint ownership of non-land assets by the members(the land in the Soviet Union was nationalized in 1917) and remuneration in proportion to labor and not capital from residual profits. Thus, the basic principle of voluntary membership had been violated by the very process of forced collectivization; members did not retain a right of free exit, and those who managed to leave could not take their share of land and assets with them (neither in kind nor in cash-equivalent form); the role of the “sovereign” general assembly and the “democratically elected” management in fact reduced to rubber-stamping the plans, targets, and decisions of the district and provincial authorities, who together with imposition of detailed work programs also nominated the preferred managerial candidates [V.I. Semchik , "Cooperation and the Law", Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1991) (Russian).] [E.V. Serova, "Agricultural Cooperation in the USSR", Agropromizdat, Moscow (1991) (Russian).] . The kolkhozy very rapidly metamorphosed from cooperatives to a mere offshoot of the state sector (although notionally they continued to be owned by their members). As a result, there were many instances since mid-1930s of kolkhozy changing their status to sovkhozy or vice versa, depending on current taxation policies and other discriminatory practices applicable to workers in the two categories of farms. The faint dividing lines between collective and state farms were obliterated almost totally in the late 1960s, when Khrushchev’s administration authorized a guaranteed wage to kolkhoz members, similarly to sovkhoz employees, thus in fact recognizing their actual status as hired hands rather than authentic cooperative members. The guaranteed wage provision was actually incorporated in the 1969 version of the Standard Charter.
The question of internal organization was important in the new kolkhozy. The most basic measure was to divide the workforce into a number of groups, generally known as brigades, for working purposes. `By July 1929 it was already normal practice for the large kolkhoz of 200-400 households to be divided into temporary or permanent work units of 15-30 households.' [R W Davies, "The Soviet Collective Farm 1929-1930" ((Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1980), p.59.] The authorities gradually came down in favour of the fixed, combined brigade, that is the brigade with its personnel, land, equipment and draught horses fixed to it for the whole period of agricultural operations, and taking responsibility for all relevant tasks during that period. The brigade was headed by a brigade leader ("brigadir"). He was usually a local man (few were women).
After the kolkhoz amalgamations of 1950 the territorial successor of the old village kolkhoz was the "complex brigade" (brigade of brigades), a sub-unit of the new enlarged kolkhoz.
Brigades could be subdivided into smaller units called zvenos (links) for carrying out some or all of their tasks.
Kolkhoz life during Stalin
In a kolkhoz, a member, called "kolkhoznik" ("колхо́зник", feminine "колхо́зница"), was paid a share of the farm’s product and profit according to the number of workdays, while a sovkhoz employed salaried workers. In practice, many Kolkhoz did not pay their "members" much at all. In 1946, 30 percent of Kolkhoz paid no cash for labor at all, 10.6 paid no grain, and 73.2 percent paid 500 grams of grain or less per day worked. ["Exile and Discipline: The June 1948 campaign against Collective Farm shirkers" by Jean Levesque, p. 13] In addition the kolkhoz was required to sell their crop to the State which fixed prices for the grain. These were set very low and the difference between what the State paid the farm and what the State charged consumers represented a major source of income for the Soviet government. In 1948 the Soviet government charged wholesalers 335 rubles for 100 kilograms of
rye, but paid the kolkhoz roughly 8 rubles.Caroline Humphrey, "Karl Marx Collective: Economy, society and religion in a Siberian collective farm", Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983), p. 96.] Nor did such prices change much to keep up with inflation. Prices paid by the Soviet government hardly changed at all between 1929 and 1953 meaning that the State did not pay one half or even one third of the cost of production.
Members of kolkhoz were allowed to hold a small area of private land and some animals. The size of the private plot varied over the Soviet period but was usually about convert|1|acre|ha. Before the
Russian Revolution of 1917a peasant with less than convert|13.5|acre|ha was considered too poor to maintain a family. [Leonard E. Hubbard, "The Economics of Soviet Agriculture", Macmillan, London (1939), p. 233.] However, the productivity of such plots is reflected in the fact that in 1938 3.9 percent of total sown land was in the form of private plots, but in 1937 those plots produced 21.5 percent of gross agriculture output. [Roy D. Laird, "Collective Farming in Russia: A Political Study of the Soviet Kolkhozy", University of Kansas Publications, Lawrence, Kansas (1958), p. 120.]
Members of the kolkhoz were required to do a minimum number of days work per year on both the kolkhoz and on other government work such as road building. In one kolkhoz the requirements were a minimum of 130 days a year for each able-bodied adult and 50 days per boy aged between 12 and 16. That was distributed around the year according to the agricultural cycle. [Fedor Belov, "The History of a Soviet Collective Farm", Praeger, New York (1955), p. 87.] If kolkhoz members did not perform the required minimum of work, the penalties could involve confiscation of the farmer's private plot, a trial in front of a People's Court that could result in three to eight months of hard labour on the kolkhoz, or up to one year in a corrective
labor camp. [Fedor Belov, "op. cit.", pp. 110-11.]
In both the kolkhoz and sovkhoz, a system of internal passports prevented movement from rural areas to urban areas. Until 1969 all children born on a collective farm were forced by law to work there as adults unless they were specifically given permission to leave. [Caroline Humphrey, "op. cit.", p. 14.] [Leonard E. Hubbard, "op. cit.", p. 275.] In effect, farmers became tied to their sovkhoz or kolkhoz in what may be described as a system of "neo-serfdom", in which the Communist bureaucracy replaced the former landowners. [Merle Fainsod, "How Russia is Ruled", Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., revised edition (1970), p. 570.]
collectivisation in the USSRand agriculture in the Soviet Unionfor general discussion of Soviet agriculture.
Basic statistics for the USSR
Kolkhozes and sovkhozes in the USSR: number of farms, average size, and share in agricultural production Source: "Statistical Yearbook of the USSR", various years, State Statistical Committee of the USSR, Moscow.
The disappearance of the kolkhoz after 1991
dissolution of the Soviet Unionin December 1991, the former Soviet republics became independent states that pursued, with varying degrees of vigor and resolve, a general policy of transition from the Soviet centrally planned economyto a market economy. Farm restructuring was one of the components of the transition agenda in the New Independent States, all of which adopted laws (typically called "Law on Enterprises and Entrepreneurship" in the various native languages) that allowed new corporate forms of farming to emerge (in addition to family farms). These corporate farms could organize as partnerships, limited-liability companies, joint-stock societies, or agricultural cooperatives, and the traditional kolkhozy and sovkhozy — collective and state farms — were generally required to re-register in one of the new corporate forms as chosen by the general assembly of their members or workers. This legal requirement led to massive "external restructuring" of kolkhozy and sovkhozy through re-registration in new corporate forms. The number of kolkhozy and sovkhozy declined rapidly after 1992, while other corporate forms gained in prominence. Still, field surveys conducted in CIS countries in the 1990s generally indicated that, in the opinion of the members and the managers, many of the new corporate farms behaved and functioned for all practical reasons like the old kolkhozy.Z. Lerman, C. Csaki, and G. Feder, "Agriculture in Transition: Land Policies and Evolving Farm Structures in Post-Soviet Countries", Lexington Books, Lanham, MD (2004), Chapter 4.] Formal re-registration only "changed the sign on the door" and did not produce radical internal restructuring of the traditional Soviet farm, although this was badly needed for improving productivity and efficiency of the former Soviet farms.
Number of kolkhozes and all corporate farms in Russia, Ukraine, and Moldova 1990-2005"Source":
*For Russia, "Agriculture in Russia", statistical yearbook, State Statistical Committee, Moscow, various years.
*For Ukraine, [http://www.iamo.de/dok/sr_vol38.pdf "Rethinking Agricultural Reform in Ukraine"] , IAMO, Halle, Germany.
*For Moldova, land balance tables, State Land Cadastre Agency, Chisinau, various years.
Kolkhozy have disappeared completely in
Transcaucasianand Central Asian states. In Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan the disappearance of the kolkhoz was part of an overall individualization of agriculture, with family farms displacing corporate farms in general. In Central Asian countries, corporate farms persist, but no kolkhozy remain. Thus, in Turkmenistan, a presidential decree of June 1995 summarily "reorganized" all kolkhozy into "peasant associations" (Turkmen: daikhan berleshik). In Tajikistan, a presidential decree of October 1995 initiated a process of conversion of kolkhozy into share-based farms operating on leased land, agricultural production cooperatives, and dehkan (peasant) farms. [ [http://www.sdietajikistan.info/research.html Murat Aminjanov, "How many farms are there in Tajikistan?"] , Policy Brief 3, European Commission "Support for the Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Agricultural Policy in Tajikistan" Project, Dushanbe (October 2007).] However, contrary to the practice in all other CIScountries, one-third of the 30,000 peasant farms in Tajikistan are organized as "collective dehkan farms" and not family farms. These collective dehkan farms are often referred to as "kolkhozy" in the vernacular, although legally they are a different organizational form and the number of "true" kolkhozy in Tajikistan today is less than 50. Similarly in Uzbekistan the 1998 Land Code renamed all kolkhozy and sovkhozy "shirkats" (Uzbek for agricultural cooperatives) and just five years later, in October 2003, the government's new strategy for land reform prescribed a sweeping reorientation from "shirkats" to peasant farms, which since then have virtually replaced all corporate farms.
Countries outside the USSR
Landwirtschaftliche Produktionsgenossenschaft, LPG - GDR
*Rolnicza Spółdzielnia Produkcyjna, RSP -
Zveno (Soviet collective farming)- working subunit of the brigade in a collective farm
Sovkhoz-- Soviet state farm
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.