- Sonnet 23
sonnet|23
As an unperfect actor on the stage,
Who with his fear is put beside his part,
Or some fierce thing replete with too much rage,
Whose strength's abundance weakens his own heart;
So I, for fear of trust, forget to say
The perfect ceremony of love's rite,
And in mine own love's strength seem to decay,
O'ercharg'd with burthen of mine own love's might.
O! let my looks be then the eloquence
And dumb presagers of my speaking breast,
Who plead for love, and look for recompense,
More than that tongue that more hath more express'd.:"O! learn to read what silent love hath writ:":"To hear with eyes belongs to love's fine wit."Shakespeare 's Sonnet 23 is one of the sequence addressed to a well-born young man. It is of special interest because of its use of a metaphor drawn from acting, a figure that has led to much attention for what the poem might reveal about Shakespeare's attitude towards his profession.Paraphrase
Like an unprepared actor whose fear prevents him from speaking his part, or like a fierce animal whose passion incapacitates him, so I, for fear of trust (an ambiguous phrase), forgot to say what I should to you, as your lover. I am, as it were, weakened by the very strength of my own love. Please let my speechless words (that is, my books) plead for me, as they are more truly eloquent than I, even if I were more eloquent than I am. I beg you to learn to read the signs of love, as love itself will give you the intuition to do.
ource and analysis
Hermann Isaac notes parallels to the central dilemma of the poem ranging from
Petrarch , the Renaissance locus for love-conceits, through Wyatt andEdmund Spenser , toWalter Raleigh andSamuel Daniel . The reference to acting has struck some critics as relevant to the author's biography.George Steevens , an advocate of early composition, argued that Shakespeare might have derived the image from watching performances of traveling troupes in Stratford; Malone suggested that the image implies familiarity with acting, not spectating. However, the image is not unique to Shakespeare and need not be taken as personal."For fear of trust" has drawn different, though not neceessarily contradictory, glosses.
Nicolaus Delius has it "from want of self-confidence," with whichEdward Dowden substantially agrees; Thomas Tyler adds "for fear that I shall not be trusted," and Beeching agrees that "the trust is active.""Dumb presagers" is sometimes seen as a continuation of the acting metaphor; a
dumb show often preceded each act of Elizabethan plays. Fleay suggests a more specific indebtedness to Daniel's "Complaint of Rosamond", 19.The principal interpretive issue relates to "books" in line 9. George Sewell and
Edward Capell , among others, supported emendation to "looks," principally because the syntactical connection with "presagers" seems to require a word in line 9 that can evoke future time. Both words fit into the trope of the lover struck dumb by his love, and hoping to use his books (or looks) to make himself understood. Editors from Malone to Booth and William Kerrigan have defended thequarto reading, and most modern editors generally retain "books."Original text
The original text from 1609
Quarto ::As an vnperfect actor on the ſtage,:Who with his feare is put beſides his part,:Or ſome fierce thing repleat with too much rage,:Whoſe ſtrengths abondance weakens his owne heart;:So I for feare of truſt,forget to ſay,:The perfect ceremony of loues right,:And in mine owne loues ſtrength ſeeme to decay,:Ore-charg'd with burthen of mine owne loues might::O let my books be then the eloquence,:And domb preſagers of my ſpeaking breſt,:Who pleade for loue,and look for recompence,:More then that tonge that more hath more expreſt.::O learne to read what ſilent loue hath writ,::To heare wit eies belongs to loues fine wiht.References
*Alden, Raymond. "The Sonnets of Shakespeare, with Variorum Reading and Commentary". Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1916.
*Baldwin, T. W. "On the Literary Genetics of Shakspeare's Sonnets". Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1950.
*Booth, Stephen. "Shakespeare's Sonnets". New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.
*Dowden, Edward. "Shakespeare's Sonnets". London, 1881.
*Hubler, Edwin. "The Sense of Shakespeare's Sonnets". Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952.External links
* [http://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/Sonnets/c1v.jpgFacsimile of Sonnet 23 from 1609 Quarto]
* [http://www.shakespeares-sonnets.com/xxiiicomm.htm Analysis]
* [http://www.cliffsnotes.com/WileyCDA/LitNote/id-169,pageNum-26.html CliffsNotes]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.