- A Random Walk Down Wall Street
Infobox Book
name = A Random Walk Down Wall Street
author =Burton Malkiel
genre =Finance
language = English
publisher =W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
release_date = 1973
pages = 456
isbn = ISBN 0 393 06245 7"A Random Walk Down Wall Street", written by
Burton Malkiel , a Princeton economist, is an influentialbook on the subject ofstock market s. Malkiel argues that asset prices typically exhibit signs ofrandom walk and that one can not consistently outperform market averages. The book is frequently cited by those in favor of theefficient market hypothesis . As of January 2008, there have been 23 editions. [ [http://worldcat.org/oclc/50919959 A random walk down Wall Street : the time-tested strategy for successful investing [WorldCat.org ] ] A practical popularization is "The Random Walk Guide to Investing: Ten Rules for Financial Success," (hardback: ISBN 978 0 393 05854 3) (paperback: ISBN 978 0 393 32639 0).On Investing Techniques
Malkiel examines some popular investing techniques, including
technical analysis andfundamental analysis in light of academic research studies of these methods. Through detailed analysis, he notes significant flaws in both techniques, concluding that, for most investors, following these methods will produce inferior results over passive strategies.Malkiel has a similar critique for methods of selecting actively managed mutual funds based upon past performance. He cites studies indicating that actively managed mutual funds vary greatly in their success rates over the long term, often underperforming in years following their success, thereby reverting toward the
mean . Malkiel suggests that given the distribution of fund performances, it is statistically unlikely that an average investor would happen to select those fewmutual fund s which will outperform their benchmark index over the long term.Critiques
Some have questioned Malkiel's thesis, citing the performance of successful adherents of
fundamental analysis includingPeter Lynch andWarren Buffett , and successful technical analysis adherents, as evidence of the effectiveness of these investing methods.There are several possible responses to these critiques. Malkiel's book and the thesis are geared toward typical investors. Professional investors, such as Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch, typically have much greater access to information, allowing for superior investment ability over individual investors. For example, Peter Lynch describes how he routinely had access to CEOs and high level officers of companies as he contemplated investing Fidelity's
Magellan Fund funds into these companies, and would glean unique insights about the companies' prospects from these visits. [cite book | author=Peter Lynch; John Rothchild | title=Beating the Street | publisher=Simon & Schuster | location=New York | year=1993 | id=ISBN 0-671-75915-9] The result of Buffett and Lynch's success may be due to superior information, financial power, or business relationships—situations that do not apply to typical investors. Thus, there may be little reason to think that average investors could duplicate these results by applying common investing techniques on their own. Moreover, even with superior information, many professional investors still underperform their benchmark indices.From a probability perspective, some very small number of adherents of both investing strategies will, by chance, be successful multiple years in a row. It is possible that some of the success of certain famous investors is due largely to chance, and that they are simply statistical
outliers . Due toselection bias , public attention focuses disproportionately on the successful investors, ignoring the much larger group of unsuccessful investors.References
External links
* [http://www.amazon.com/Random-Walk-Down-Wall-Street/dp/0393315290 A Random Walk Down Wall Street in Amazon.com]
* [http://www.wwnorton.com/catalog/spring00/malkiel2.htm A Random Walk Down Wall Street—Excerpts]
* [http://www.bainvestor.com/Random-walk-down-wall-street.html Review on Bainvestor.com]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.