Back rank checkmate

Chess diagram small|=
tright|
=
| | |rl| | |kd| |=
| | | | |pd|pd|pd|=
| | | | | | | |=
| | | | | | | |=
| | | | | | | |=
| | | | | | | |=
| | | | | | | |=
| | | | | | | |=
Back rank checkmate. White has just moved the rook to d8 from another square on the d-file.Chess diagram small|=
tleft|
=
| | | |ql| | |kd|=
pd|pd|pd| | | |pd|pd|=
| | |pd| | | | |=
| |bd| |pd| | | |=
| | | |pl| | | |=
| | |pl| |pl| |pl|=
pl|pl|pl| | |pl| | |=
rl| | | | |rl|kl| |=
Back rank mate after 22.Qxe8#.White captured the black rook on e8 with his queen. In chess, a back rank checkmate is a checkmate delivered by a rook or queen along a back rank (that is, the row on which the pieces (not pawns) stand at the start of the game) in which the mated king is unable to move up the board because the king is blocked by friendly pieces (usually pawns) on the second rank. A typical position is shown to the right harvcol|Burgess|2000|p=18.

Introduction

Back rank mates occur quite often in games at fairly low levels, as it occurs out of carelessness. This is due to the fact that beginners typically lack the skill to realize that such a fate could occur based on the laws of the game. At higher levels of play, though the mate itself does not occur very often, play is often affected by the possibility of it - the fact that a player has to spend time guarding against the mate may leave him vulnerable to other tactical ideas.

Chess diagram|=
tleft|
=
rd| |rd| | | |kd| |=
pd| | | | |pd|pd|pd|=
|pd|bd| | | | | |=
qd| | | | | | | |=
| |ql| | | | | |=
|pl| |rl| | | | |=
pl| |bl| | |pl|pl|pl|=
| | |rl| | |kl| |=|Back rank mates are often guarded against simply by virtue of a friendly rook or queen protecting the back rank. However, it may be possible for the attacking side to deflect one of these pieces away from defensive duties. In the example shown to the left, for example, White to move can play 1.Qxc6 when black cannot reply 1...Rxc6 because of 2.Rd8+ Rxd8 3.Rxd8# with a back rank mate. Black therefore loses his bishop for no compensation-and Black has no good continuation because of the threat to chew up more material with Qxa8 or Qxc8. For example, 1. ... Qa6 2.Qxa8! Rxa8 3.Rd8+ Rxd8 4.Rxd8#. Examples such as this, where a rook cannot leave the back rank because of mate threats, are relatively common in chess.

Back rank threats can be guarded against more permanently by moving one of the pawns in front of the king to give the king a "flight square" (such a move is sometimes said to "give the king some "luft"). If it were Black to play in the example to the left, he could counter White's threat with (among other moves) 1...g6, giving the king a square on g7 to which he could safely move. Note, however, that 1...h6 in this example would not do the job, as after the d3 rook moves the h7 square is guarded by the white bishop.

It should be noted that it is often not a good idea to play such pawn moves unless there is a pressing need to do so, as they can represent a loss of time. In many chess openings, however, they are often played for some other purpose, before any back rank threats have emerged (...h6 is often played to bother a white bishop on g5, for example. Also see Fianchetto).

Example from game by Capablanca

Chess diagram|=
tright
Bernstein-Capablanca, 1914
=
| | |rd| | |kd| |=
pd| | | | |pd|pd|pd|=
|qd| | | | | | |=
| | | | | | | |=
| | | | | | | |=
| |rl| |pl| | | |=
pl| | | |ql|pl|pl|pl|=
| | | | | |kl| |=
Position after White's 29th move.One of José Raúl Capablanca's most famous games featured a variety of back rank threats at the end. It was an exhibition game played in Moscow in 1914 against Ossip Bernstein (Capablanca had the black pieces). The position shown to the right was reached after white's 29th move. Capablanca now played 29...Qb2! The simplest point is that 30.Qxb2 is not possible because of the back rank mate 30...Rd1#, but there are several related ideas: for example, 30.Qe1, apparently defending the threatened rook, loses to 30...Qxc3 (if 31.Qxc3 then ...Rd1+ 32.Qe1 Rxe1#); 30.Rc2 fails to 30...Qb1+ 31.Qf1 Qxc2; and 30.Qc2 loses to 30...Qa1+ 31.Qc1 Rd1+ 32.Qxd1 Qxd1#. After 30.Rc8 it looks like white may turn the tables as 30...Rxc8? allows 31.Qxb2 to win a queen for a rook, however Capablanca has 30...Qa1+(or Qb1+) when instead white loses a rook after 31.Qf1 Qxf1+ 32.Kxf1 Rxc8.

Note that had Capablanca played for the back rank mate more directly with 29...Qb1+ 30.Qf1 Rd1? (30...Qxa2 would be sensible), he would himself have lost to the back rank mate 31.Rc8+ Rd8 32.Rxd8#.

References

*citation
last=Burgess |first=Graham |authorlink = Graham Burgess
title=The Mammoth Book of Chess
publisher=Carroll & Graf
year=2000
edition = 2nd
id=ISBN 978-0-7867-0725-6
* Citation
surname1=Hooper|given1=David|authorlink1=David Vincent Hooper
surname2=Whyld|given2=Kenneth|authorlink2=Kenneth Whyld
title=The Oxford Companion to Chess
year=1992
edition=second
publisher=Oxford University Press
ID=ISBN 0-19-866164-9

External links

* [http://www.chessdryad.com/education/magictheater/backrank/brmate_01.htm How to Play Chess:Back-rank mate] audio.