Tarski-Vaught test

Tarski-Vaught test

The Tarski-Vaught test (sometimes called Tarski's criterion) is a result in model theory which characterizes the elementary substructures of a given structure using definable sets. It is often used to determine whether a substructure of a structure is elementary, and is particularly useful in the construction of elementary substructures. Formally,

:For a given first-order language mathcal{L}, let mathcal{N} be a structure with domain N, and mathcal{M} be a substructure of mathcal{N} with domain M (written mathcal{M}subseteqmathcal{N}). Then mathcal{M} is an elementary substructure of mathcal{N} (written mathcal{M}) if and only if for every nonempty Asubseteq N definable in mathcal{N} with parameters from M, A contains an element of M.

More generally, the Tarski-Vaught test can be applied to any set of formulas Φ closed under taking subformulas. In this case it says that all formulas in the set are absolute for mathcal{M}subseteqmathcal{N} if and only if whenever φ in the set Φ is of the form exists xpsi(x,y_1,...,y_n) and "y""i" are in "M" then :mathcal{N}vDash(exists xin N psi(x,y_1,...,y_n))implies: mathcal{N}vDash(exists xin Mpsi(x,y_1,...,y_n)).Roughly speaking, this means that whenever "N" contains an element with some property definable by formulas from Φ then "M" contains an element with this property. The Tarski-Vaught theorem for elementary embeddings is the special case of this when Φ consists of all formulas; for technical reasons it is sometimes useful to allow Φ to consist of just a finite number of formulas (often all subformulas of a given formula).

Proof

First suppose mathcal{M}. Let Asubseteq N be nonempty and definable in mathcal{N} using varphi(x,x_1,ldots,x_n) with parameters b_1,ldots,b_nin M. We must prove Acap M eemptyset. Since A eemptyset, we have:mathcal{N}modelsexists xvarphi [b_1,ldots,b_n] (Note that the bracket notation here is used to indicate the assignment of specific values to the free variables of the formula.) But then, by definition of an elementary substructure,: mathcal{M}modelsexists xvarphi [b_1,ldots,b_n] Thus there exists an ain M such that mathcal{M}modelsvarphi [a,b_1,ldots,b_n] . Again by definition of elementary substructure, mathcal{N}modelsvarphi [a,b_1,ldots,b_n] , so ain A. Thus Acap M eemptyset as desired.

Conversely, suppose every nonempty subset of N definable in mathcal{N} with parameters from M contains an element of M. We prove mathcal{M} by induction on formulas. The atomic and boolean cases are immediate from definitions since mathcal{M}subseteqmathcal{N}. Suppose the result holds for psi(x,x_1,ldots,x_n) and consider exists xpsi. Since Msubseteq N, it is immediate that for any a_1,ldots,a_nin M, if mathcal{M}modelsexists xpsi [a_1,ldots,a_n] , then mathcal{N}modelsexists xpsi [a_1,ldots,a_n] . Suppose now mathcal{M} otmodelsexists xpsi [a_1,ldots,a_n] for some a_1,ldots,a_nin M. Thus for all ain M,:mathcal{M} otmodelspsi [a,a_1,ldots,a_n] so by the induction hypothesis, for all ain M,:(*) mathcal{N} otmodelspsi [a,a_1,ldots,a_n] Now consider the set Asubseteq N defined in mathcal{N} by psi(x,x_1,ldots,x_n) using parameters a_1,ldots,a_n. If there exists bin N such that mathcal{N}modelspsi [b,a_1,ldots,a_n] , then A eemptyset. By our hypothesis then, there exists an ain Acap M. But this contradicts (*). Thus mathcal{N} otmodelsexists xpsi [a_1,ldots,a_n] . It follows that mathcal{M} as desired. Q.E.D.

References

*Slaman, Theodore A. and W. Hugh Woodin. "Mathematical Logic: The Berkeley Undergraduate Course". Spring 2006.


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно сделать НИР?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Robert Lawson Vaught — (April 4 1926, Alhambra, California – April 2 2002) was a mathematical logician, and one of the founders of model theory. LifeVaught was a bit of a musical prodigy in his youth, in his case the piano. He began his university studies at Pomona… …   Wikipedia

  • Morley's categoricity theorem — Vaught s test redirects here. Not to be confused with the Tarski–Vaught test. Categorical theory redirects here. Not to be confused with Category Theory. In model theory, a branch of mathematical logic, a theory is κ categorical (or categorical… …   Wikipedia

  • List of mathematics articles (T) — NOTOC T T duality T group T group (mathematics) T integration T norm T norm fuzzy logics T schema T square (fractal) T symmetry T table T theory T.C. Mits T1 space Table of bases Table of Clebsch Gordan coefficients Table of divisors Table of Lie …   Wikipedia

  • Model theory — This article is about the mathematical discipline. For the informal notion in other parts of mathematics and science, see Mathematical model. In mathematics, model theory is the study of (classes of) mathematical structures (e.g. groups, fields,… …   Wikipedia

  • Löwenheim–Skolem theorem — In mathematical logic, the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem, named for Leopold Löwenheim and Thoralf Skolem, states that if a countable first order theory has an infinite model, then for every infinite cardinal number κ it has a model of size κ. The… …   Wikipedia

  • Elementary substructure — In model theory, given two structures mathfrak A 0 and mathfrak A, both of a common signature Sigma, we say that mathfrak A 0 is an elementary substructure of mathfrak A (sometimes notated mathfrak A 0 preceq mathfrak A [Monk 1976: 331 (= Def. 19 …   Wikipedia

  • Definable set — In mathematical logic, a definable set is an n ary relation on the domain of a structure whose elements are precisely those elements satisfying some formula in the language of that structure. A set can be defined with or without parameters, which …   Wikipedia

  • List of mathematical logic topics — Clicking on related changes shows a list of most recent edits of articles to which this page links. This page links to itself in order that recent changes to this page will also be included in related changes. This is a list of mathematical logic …   Wikipedia

  • logic, history of — Introduction       the history of the discipline from its origins among the ancient Greeks to the present time. Origins of logic in the West Precursors of ancient logic       There was a medieval tradition according to which the Greek philosopher …   Universalium

  • Liste de théorèmes — par ordre alphabétique. Pour l établissement de l ordre alphabétique, il a été convenu ce qui suit : Si le nom du théorème comprend des noms de mathématiciens ou de physiciens, on se base sur le premier nom propre cité. Si le nom du théorème …   Wikipédia en Français

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”