- U. G. Krishnamurti
Infobox Person
name = U.G. Krishnamurti
bgcolour = silver
image_size = 150px
caption =
birth_date =July 9 ,1918
birth_place =Masulipatam ,India
death_date =March 22 ,2007
death_place =Vallecrosia ,Italy
education =
occupation =philosopher ,public speaker ,author
title =
spouse =
parents =
children =
nationality =
website =Uppaluri Gopala Krishnamurti (July 9 ,1918 –March 22 ,2007 ), better known as U.G. Krishnamurti, or just U.G., was a speaker andphilosopher , often known as an "anti-guru " or as "the man who refused to be a guru" [ [http://www.lifepositive.com/Spirit/new-age-catalysts/krishnamurti.asp An Interview with U.G. at lifepositive.com] ] .Philosophy
I have no message for mankind.
This is how U.G. Krishnamurti often summed up his own insights, denying the value others thought they found in them. Whatever else statements without value for mankind may be, if we are to give to philosophy its usual and ordinary meaning, philosophy they are not. More in the nature of negations, his statements prompted others to label him at various times "anti-guru", "the
nihilist ofenlightenment ", and "a spiritual terrorist". [ [http://www.realization.org/page/topics/krishnamurti_u_g.htm U.G. quoted at website realization.org] .]He refused to be called a guru, vociferously opposed all notions of enlightenment and
spirituality , and attacked all aspects of human thought and thinking. He claimed no rights of ownership in his published words:My teaching, if that is the word you want to use, has no
copyright . You are free to reproduce, distribute, interpret, misinterpret, distort, garble, do what you like, even claim authorship, without my consent or the permission of anybody. [ Statement by U.G. that appears in all his published works.]U.G. emphasized the impossibility and non-necessity of any human change, radical or mundane. These assertions, he stated, cannot be considered as a "teaching", that is, something intended to be used to bring about a change. He insisted that the body and its actions are already perfect, and he considered attempts to change or mold the body as violations of the peace and the harmony that is already there. The psyche or self or mind, an entity which he denied as having any being, is composed of nothing but the "demand" to bring about change in the world, in itself, or in both. Furthermore, human
self-consciousness is not a thing, but a movement, one characterized by "perpetual malcontent" and a "fascist insistence" on its own importance and survival.U.G. also maintained that the reason people came to him (and to gurus), was in order to find solutions for their everyday real problems, and/or for solutions to a fabricated problem, namely, the search for spirituality and enlightenment. He insisted that this search is caused by the
cultural environment , which demandsconformity of individuals as it simultaneously places within them the desire to be special - the achievement of enlightenment thus viewed as a crowning expression of an individual's "specialness" and uniqueness. Consequently, the desire for enlightenment is exploited by gurus, spiritual teachers, and other "sellers of shoddy goods", who pretend to offer various ways to reach that goal. According to U.G., all these facilitators never deliver, and cannot ever deliver, since the goal itself (i.e. enlightenment), is unreachable. [ [http://www.lifepositive.com/Spirit/new-age-catalysts/krishnamurti.asp An Interview with UG at lifepositive] Also see [http://gatelessgate.wordpress.com/category/ugkrishnamurti/ Interview at GatelessGate online magazine] .]The articulation of his insights, at least in public, did not begin until U.G. was well into middle age. According to U.G., despite his life-long efforts to bring about
spiritual enlightenment , he underwent a life-altering series of personal experiences, which he collectively referred to as his "calamity ". (See sections below). According to U.G., "The so called self-realization is the discovery for yourself and by yourself that there is no self to discover. That will be a very shocking thing because it's going to blast every nerve, every cell, even the cells in the marrow of your bones." [ [http://www.ugkrishnamurti.org/ug/quotes_and_photos/album02/page01.html] .]Biography
Early life and India
He was born on July 9, 1918 in
Machilipatnam , a town in coastalAndhra Pradesh ,India , and raised in the nearby town ofGudivada . His mother died seven days after he was born, and he was brought up by his maternal grandfather, a wealthyBrahmin lawyer, who was also involved in theTheosophical Society . U.G. also became a member of the Theosophical Society during his teenage years. [U.G. in [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Mystique_of_Enlightenment/Part_One Mystique Of Enlightenment] , mentions having "inherited" his association with the Theosophical Society from his grandfather.] During the same period of his life, U.G. practiced all kinds of austerities and earnestly soughtmoksha or spiritual enlightenment. To that end, between the ages of fourteen and twenty-one, he undertook all kinds of spiritual exercise, determined to find out whether moksha was possible. Wanting to achieve that state, he had also resolved to prove that if there were people who have thus "realized" themselves, they could not behypocritical . [U.G. carried on at some length - in practically every published work - about what he perceived as the hypocricy of religious/spiritual people, his grandfather and other prominent Theosophists included.] As part of this endeavor, he searched for a person who was an embodiment of such "realization".He spent seven summers in the
Himalayas withSwami Sivananda studyingyoga and practicingmeditation . [U.G. would later also dismiss this period with Sivananda as a useless exercise.] During his twenties, U.G. began attending theUniversity of Madras , studying psychology, philosophy, mysticism, and the sciences, but never completed a degree, having determined that the answers of the West - to what he considered were essential questions - were no better than those of the East.In 1939, at age 21, U.G. met with renowned spiritual teacher
Ramana Maharshi . U.G. related that he asked Ramana, "This thing called moksha, can you give it to me?" - to which Ramana Maharshi purportedly replied, "I can give it, but can you take it?". This answer completely altered U.G.'s perceptions of the "spiritual path" and its practitioners, and he never again sought the counsel of "those religious people". Later U.G. would say that Maharshi's answer - which he perceived as "arrogant" - put him "back on track". [ [http://www.inner-quest.org/UG_R.htm Biographical details at inner-quest] ]In 1941, he began working for the Theosophical Society, in
C.W. Leadbeater 's library. [Eventually, U.G. was elected Joint General Secretary of the Indian Section. His association with the Society lasted until the early-mid 1950s, see [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Mystique_of_Enlightenment/Part_One Mystique Of Enlightenment] .] Shortly, he began an international lecture tour on behalf of the Society, visiting Norway, Belgium, Germany and the United States. Returning to India, he married a Brahmin woman named Kusuma Kumari in 1943, at age 25. [ [http://www.sentientpublications.com/authors/ug.php UG biography at sentientpublications] ]From 1947 to 1953, U.G. regularly attended talks given by
Jiddu Krishnamurti inMadras , India, eventually beginning a direct dialogue with him in 1953. [U.G. described one of their meetings as follows: "We really didn't get along well. Whenever we met we locked horns over some issue or other. For instance, I never shared his concern for the world, or his belief that his teaching would profoundly affect the thoughts and actions of mankind for the next five hundred years--a fantasy of the Theosophistoccultists . In one of our meetings I told Krishnamurti, "I am not called upon to save the world." He asked, "The house is on fire--what will you do?" "Pour more gasoline on it and maybe something will rise from the ashes", I remarked. Krishnamurti said, "You are absolutely impossible". Then I said, "You are still a Theosophist. You have never freed yourself from theWorld Teacher role. There is a story in the Avadhuta Gita which talks of the avadhut who stopped at a wayside inn and was asked by the innkeeper, 'What is your teaching?' He replied, 'There is no teacher, no teaching and no one taught.' And then he walked away. You too repeat these phrases and yet you are so concerned with preserving your teaching for posterity in its pristine purity"] cite book|last=Krishnamurti|first=U.G.|coauthors=Rodney Arms|edition=3rd ed|year=2001|title=Mystique of Enlightenment Part One|url=http://www.well.com/user/jct/mystiq.htm|accessdate=2007-09-05] U.G. related that the two had almost daily discussions for a while, which he asserted were not providing satisfactory answers to his questions. Finally, their meetings came to a halt. He described part of the final discussion:And then, towards the end, I insisted, "Come on, is there anything behind the
abstractions you are throwing at me?" And that chappie said, "You have no way of knowing it for yourself". Finish -- that was the end of our relationship, you see -- "If I have no way of knowing it, you have no way of communicating it. What the hell are we doing? I've wasted seven years. Goodbye, I don't want to see you again". Then I walked out.After the break with K. Jiddu, U.G. continued travelling, still lecturing. At about the same time he claims to have been "puzzled" by the continuing appearance of certain
psychic powers. In 1955, U.G. and his family went to the United States to seek medical treatment for his eldest son, and stayed there for 5 years.London period
He ultimately separated from his family and went to
London where he lived a bleak existence, alone and penniless, wandering the streets, often depending on the charity of others for survival. [U.G. had earlier inherited a considerable - for the time - sum of money from his grandfather. While in the US for his son's treatments, the last of that money had run out. See [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Mystique_of_Enlightenment/Part_One Mystique Of Enlightenment] .] While sitting one day in Hyde Park, he was confronted by a police officer who threatened to lock him up if he didn't leave the park. Down to his last fivepence , he made his way to theRamakrishna Mission of London where the residingSwami gave him money for a hotel room for the night. The following day, U.G. began working for the Ramakrishna Mission, an arrangement that lasted for a period of three months. Before leaving the mission he left a letter for the residing "Swamiji" telling him that he had become a new man. [ [http://ugbio.blogspot.com/2007/12/adrift-in-london-experiences-of-others.html from U.G. Krishnamurti biography, chapter: Adrift in London] ]About this time, Jiddu Krishnamurti was in London and the two Krishnamurtis renewed their acquaintance. Jiddu tried to advise U.G. on his recent marital troubles, but U.G. didn't want his help. Jiddu eventually persuaded him to attend a few talks he was giving in London, which U.G. did, but found himself bored listening to him. [Jiddu Krishnamurti had apparently taken an interest in U.G.'s family since the time they first met in person in 1953. See link [http://ug-k.blogspot.com/2007/04/locking-of-horns-inspiration-is.html U.G. Krishnamurti biography, chapter: Locking of horns] ]
In 1961, U.G. put an end to his relationship with his wife, who had recently been suicidal (she later underwent
shock therapy and died of an accident in 1963). Their marriage had been a largely unhappy affair, and by that time he described himself as being "detached" from his family emotionally as well as physically. He then left London and spent three months living inParis , using funds he had obtained by selling his unused return ticket to India, during which time he ate a different variety of cheese each day. Down to his last 150francs , he went toGeneva .Early Swiss period
After two weeks in Geneva, U.G. was unable to pay his hotel bill and sought refuge at the Indian
Consulate . He was listless, without hope, and described himself as "finished" - he requested that he be sent back to India, which the consular authorities refused to do at the state's expense. At that time, he met a Swiss woman named Valentine de Kerven, who worked at the consulate. Valentine and U.G. became close friends, and she provided him with a home inSwitzerland . It was the beginning of a life-long relationship.For the next few years, the questions regarding the subject of enlightenment - or anything else - did not interest him, and he did nothing to further his enquiry. But by 1967, U.G. was again concerned with the subject of enlightenment, wanting to know what that state was, which sages such as
Siddhārtha Gautama purportedly attained. Hearing thatJiddu Krishnamurti was giving a talk inSaanen , U.G. decided to attend. During the talk, Jiddu was describing his own state and U.G. thought that it referred to him (U.G.). He explained it as follows:When I Iistened to him, something funny happened to me -- a peculiar kind of feeling that he was describing my state and not his state. Why did I want to know his state? He was describing something, some movements, some awareness, some silence -- "In that silence there is no mind; there is action" -- all kinds of things. So, I am in that state. What the hell have I been doing these thirty or forty years, listening to all these people and struggling, wanting to understand his state or the state of somebody else, Buddha or
Jesus ? I am in that state. Now I am in that state. So, then I walked out of the tent and never looked back.He continues:
Then -- very strange -- that question "What is that state?" transformed itself into another question "How do I know that I am in that state, the state of Buddha, the state I very much wanted and demanded from everybody? I am in that state, but how do I know?"cite book|last=Krishnamurti|first=U.G.|coauthors=Rodney Arms|edition=3rd ed|year=2001|title=Mystique of Enlightenment Part One|url=http://www.well.com/user/jct/mystiq.htm|accessdate=2007-09-05]
Calamity
The next day, on his 49th birthday, U.G. was again pondering the question "How do I know I am in that state?" with no answer forthcoming. He later recounted that on suddenly realizing the question had no answer, there was an unexpected physical, as well as psychological, reaction. It seemed to him like "a sudden explosion inside, blasting, as it were, every cell, every nerve and every gland in my body." Afterwards, he started experiencing what he called "the calamity", a series of bizarre
physiological transformations that took place over the course of a week, affecting each one of his senses, and finally resulting in a deathlike experience. He described it this way:I call it calamity because from the point of view of one who thinks this is something fantastic, blissful and full of beatitude, love, or ecstasy, this is physical torture; this is a calamity from that point of view. Not a calamity to me but a calamity to those who have an image that something marvelous is going to happen.
Upon the eighth day:
Then, on the eighth day I was sitting on the sofa and suddenly there was an outburst of tremendous energy -- tremendous energy shaking the whole body, and along with the body, the sofa, the chalet and the whole universe, as it were -- shaking, vibrating. You can't create that movement at all. It was sudden. Whether it was coming from outside or inside, from below or above, I don't know -- I couldn't locate the spot; it was all over. It lasted for hours and hours. I couldn't bear it but there was nothing I could do to stop it; there was a total helplessness. This went on and on, day after day, day after day.
The energy that is operating there does not feel the limitations of the body; it is not interested; it has its own momentum. It is a very painful thing. It is not that ecstatic, blissful beatitude and all that rubbish -- stuff and nonsense! -- it is really a painful thing.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.