- Gaius Aurelius Cotta
Gaius
Aurelius Cotta (ca. 124 - 73 BC) was a Roman statesman and orator; not to be confused withGaius Aurelius L.f. Cotta who was Consul in 252 withPublius Servilius Q.f. Geminus .He was the uncle to
Julius Caesar through Caesar's mother,Aurelia Cotta . In 92 BC he defended his unclePublius Rutilius Rufus , who had been unjustly accused of extortion in Asia. He was on intimate terms with the tribune Marcus Livius Drusus, who was murdered in 91 BC, and in the same year was an unsuccessful candidate for the tribunate. Shortly afterwards he was prosecuted under the "lex Varia ", directed against all who had in any way supported the Italians against Rome, and, in order to avoid condemnation, went into voluntary exile.He did not return until 82 BC, during the dictatorship of
Lucius Cornelius Sulla . In 75 he was consul, and excited the hostility of the "optimates" by carrying a law that abolished the Sullan disqualification of the tribunes from holding higher magistracies; another law "de judiciis privatis", of which nothing is known, was abrogated by his brother Lucius Cotta. Cotta obtained the province ofGaul , and was granted a triumph for some victory of which we possess no details; but on the very day before its celebration an old wound broke out, and he was injured suddenly.According to
Cicero , Publius Sulpicius Rufus and Cotta were the best speakers of the young men of their time. Physically incapable of rising to passionate heights of oratory, Cotta's successes were chiefly due to his searching investigation of facts; he kept strictly to the essentials of the case and avoided all irrelevant digressions. His style was pure and simple. He is introduced by Cicero as an interlocutor in the "De oratore" and "De natura deorum" (iii.), as a supporter of the principles of the New Academy. The fragments of Sallust contain the substance of a speech delivered by Cotta in order to calm the popular anger at a deficient corn-supply.In Cicero's accounts it has been read that Cotta was hit by an artillery ballista as he was strolling through the streets of a Gallic village. Evidence shows a misfire from an artillery examination headed right toward him and the projectile impaled him through the back. To cover up the catastrophe the soldiers who fired the ballista claimed that Gallic
Druids committed the crime. But they were convicted and sentenced to death by lamping, an elaborate form of execution which involves the family members of the deceased hurling lamps at the criminals until they die.See Cicero, "De oratore", iii.3, "Brutus", 49, 55, 90, 92;
Sallust , "Hist. Frag.";Appian , "Bell. Civ." i.37.References
*1911
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
