USS Triton (SS-201)

USS "Triton" (SS-201), a "Tambor"-class submarine, was the first submarine and third ship of the United States Navy to be named for Triton. Her keel was down on 5 July 1939 by the Portsmouth Navy Yard. She was launched on 25 March 1940 sponsored by Mrs. Ernest J. King, wife of Rear Admiral King, and commissioned on 15 August 1940 with Lieutenant Commander Willis A. "Pilly" Lent (Class of 1925) [Blair, "Silent Victory" (J. B. Lippincott Company (1975), p.907.] in command.

The new submarine held her shakedown training in the Caribbean Sea from 14 January 1941 to 26 March and then conducted training and minelaying exercises in the Portsmouth, New Hampshire - New London, Connecticut area. "Triton" departed Portsmouth on 1 July, transited the Panama Canal on 12 July, and arrived at San Diego, California, on 20 July. Nine days later, she and sister ship USS|Trout|SS-202 headed for Hawaii and arrived at Pearl Harbor on 4 August.

First patrol

Assigned to Submarine Division 62, [Commanded by Forrest M. O'Leary. Blair, p.83.] "Triton" made a training cruise to Midway from 30 August to 15 September, then participated in local and fleet operations in the Hawaiian area. On 19 November, the submarine headed west to conduct a practice war patrol and arrived off Wake Island on 26 November. On 8 December, she saw columns of smoke rising over the island but assumed it was caused by construction work being done ashore. That night, when she surfaced to charge her batteries, she was informed by radio Wake and Pearl Harbor had been bombed and was ordered to stay out of range of Wake's guns. The next morning, "Triton" observed the Japanese bombing the island. On the night of 10 December, she was surfaced, charging her batteries, when flashes of light from Wake revealed a destroyer or light cruiser on a parallel course. The submarine was silhouetted against the moon, and the enemy ship turned towards her. "Triton" went deep and began evasive action. When the Japanese ship slowed astern, the submarine came to convert|120|ft and fired four stern torpedoes—the first American torpedoes shot during World War II—on sonar bearings. [For which squadron commander Captain Al McCann was critical. Blair, p.120-1.] She heard a dull explosion 58 seconds later and believed one had hit the target, then went to convert|175|ft and cleared the area. (No sinking was recorded, and she was not credited with one.) [Blair, pp.120 and 901.] After their initial repulse on 11 December, the Japanese returned with two aircraft carrier, "Hiryū" and "Sōryū"; "Triton" was not informed, [Blair, p.123.] and made no attacks on them. Neither did she make any effort to evacuate the 350 Marines. [Blair, p.123.] On 21 December, the submarine was ordered to return to Hawaii, and she arrived back at Pearl Harbor on 31 December.

econd patrol

On 25 January 1942, "Triton" got underway for the East China Sea and her second war patrol, covering the sealanes to Dairen, Shanghai, and Korea. [Blair, p.208.] She was off Kyūshū on 17 February when she contacted a freighter. The submarine fired four torpedoes and scored one hit in the stern. The target stopped for a few minutes and then slowly got underway. That evening, "Triton" attacked another freighter with two torpedoes at a range of convert|1200|yd. One hit the Japanese cargo ship aft of her well deck, and the maru went dead in the water and began settling. Soon, several heavy explosions marked the end of "Shinyo Maru Number 5". Four days later, the submarine intercepted two cargo ships. She sank "Shokyu Maru" with two torpedoes but could not attack the second ship because of its speed and the appearance of a four-engine patrol plane. On the night of 27 February, the submarine was on the surface for a battery charge when she sighted a ship approximately three miles away. She closed to attack and fired two torpedoes. One torpedo hit, but haze over the water and smoke from the damaged ship prohibited a second attack. "Triton" made no further contacts and returned to Pearl Harbor on 17 March, where she was praised for an aggressive patrol, earning credit for two ships totalling 12,000 tons (reduced to 5,982 tons postwar), but criticized for excessive use of torpedoes, which were in extremely short supply. [Thanks to BuOrd's inadequate production. Blair, pp.69, 120-1, 208-9, and 907.]

Third patrol

"Triton" (now in the hands of C.C. Kirkpatrick, Class of 1931) ["the youngest skipper yet to get a command at Pearl Harbor". Blair, p.224.] got underway on 13 April to return to the East China Sea. Ten days later, the submarine contacted a 2,000-ton [Blair, p.225.] trawler near Marcus, astonishingly stopped and not blacked out. [Blair, p.225.] After missing with two torpedoes (at point blank range), [Blair, p.225.] she surfaced to engage with her deck guns, firing 19 rounds of three-inch (76 mm) and "a hurricane of small-arms", [Blair, p.225.] leaving the trawler a sinking wreck, giving "Triton" the first confirmed sinking of an enemy vessel by deck gun fire by an American submarine.

Amid shallow, glassy seas and poor sonar conditions, [Blair, p.225.] on 1 May, she sighted six freighters, in two columns, escorted by a single [Blair, p.225.] torpedo boat. She fired two torpedoes, and both hit the leading ship, "Taei Maru" (2,200 tons), which sank), [Blair, p.225.] then two more at the next freighter; both missed. She fired at a third cargoman but the torpedo ran deep; a second torpedo, set shallow and aimed at a different ship, [Blair, p.225.] broke the back of "Calcutta Maru" (5,300 tons), [Blair, p.225.] which promptly sank.

"Triton" contacted an escorted convoy on 6 May and fired two torpedoes at the trailing ship; one sank soon after leaving the tube, the other missed ahead. [Blair, p.225.] She next spotted a destroyer coming to the rear of the convoy, fired two more (both set shallow) at this same ship from convert|1200|yd, and went deep to elude. Her sonar heard two violent explosions; "Taigen Maru" (5,600 tons) had sunk. [Blair, p.225.] At that point, the submarine maneuvered around and ahead of the convoy to position for another attack. When she attained the desired position, she fired four torpedoes—two at the third ship and two at a fourth. "Triton" heard two explosions from the first spread (one in the third ship), none from the second (which had avoided), [Blair, p.225.] as she was forced to take evasive action from the escort. The submarine later returned to periscope depth, but no ships were in sight. The convoy had cleared the area. On 15 May, she sank two deep-sea fishing boats with her deck guns.

The next day, after monitoring orders to other boats attempting to intercept without success, "Triton" ran into position [Blair, pp.231 & 233.] and at 15.20 spotted the crippled "Shōkaku" and a destroyer, returning from Coral Sea. At convert|6700|yd, with the target making convert|16|kn|km/h, [Blair, p.225.] "Triton" could not close the range, despite surfacing and bending on 19½ knots (36 km/h). [Blair, p.225.] She sent a contact report, but it was not acknowledged.

Also that day, in "one of the luckiest finds of the war", [Blair, p.225.] "I 64" [Blair, p.225.] [Fitzsimons, Bernard, ed. "Illustrated Encyclopedia of 20th Century Weapons and Warfare" (London: Phoebus, 1978), Volume 13, p.1410, "I61".] surfaced right in front of "Triton"; she fired her last bow torpedo from convert|6200|yd and parts of the target were blown convert|100|ft|-1 into the air. "I 164" (1,700 tons), [Fitzsimons, p.1410, "I61".] the fourth Japanese sub sunk by the Pacific Fleet Sub Force, [Blair, p.225.] went down by the stern. Four days later, "Triton" fired her last four torpedoes at another enemy submarine; all missed. The patrol earned her credit for five ships of 24,200 tons (reduced to 15,800 postwar), [Blair, p.908. It was a remarkable first effort for Kirkpatrick. ] terminating at Pearl Harbor on 4 June, as the Battle of Midway began.

Fourth patrol

"Triton"'s fourth war patrol took her to Alaskan waters and lasted from 25 June to 24 August. On 4 July, she was patrolling in a heavy fog, in the vicinity of Cape Sabok, when the fog lifted enough to reveal a Japanese destroyer. The submarine trailed the enemy for ten hours, [Blair, p.270.] in and out of patches of fog, until she had closed the range to convert|3000|yd. "Triton" then fired two torpedoes, and one hit amidships. The Japanese destroyer "Nenohi" {right} (1,370 tons) [Fitzsimons, Volume 12, p.1247, "Hatsuharu".] capsized to port and slid under the waves in five minutes. [Blair, p.270.] "Triton" sighted a freighter on 28 July, but lost it in a fog bank. The same thing happened the next day. On 9 August, "Triton" saw an enemy submarine's periscope and prepared to attack. However, the Japanese sub struck first, forcing "Triton" to go deep as enemy torpedoes passed overhead. On 15 August, "Triton" fired four torpedoes at a darkened ship from a range of convert|1500|yd. There were two consecutive explosions, and flames shot over convert|200|ft|-1 into the air. To "Triton", the enemy ship appeared to be larger than a destroyer. However, there is no official record of a sinking on that date. [Japanese records are notoriously chaotic, and the JANAC accounting equally unreliable as a result, however.] The submarine made no further contacts before returning to Pearl Harbor on 7 September, and was credited with two ships for 3,100 tons (postwar, only "Nenohi", at 1,600 tons). [Blair, p.914.] She then entered Pearl Harbor Navy Yard for an overhaul until 6 December.

Fifth patrol

On 16 December, "Triton" got underway for a position 20 miles (30 km) east of Wake on the Midway–Wake route. She was one of three submarines stationed between the two islands to mark the way for United States Army Air Forces B-24 Liberator bombers in strikes on Wake and to rescue the crews of any planes forced down at sea. She made no rescues, but, on the night of 23 December, she aided in guiding the Liberators in a night bombing attack on the island. On 24 December, the submarine sighted the mast of a ship on the horizon, headed for Wake anchorage. "Triton" (alerted by ULTRA) [Blair, p.334.] closed to convert|1000|yd and fired two torpedoes. One hit under the stack, the other under the foremast. "Amakasu Maru Number 1" was obliterated in a cloud of smoke and steam as she went under. The submarine then set a course for Brisbane. On 28 December, she sighted an enemy ship, closed to convert|7000|yd, and fired three torpedoes into the transport "Omi Maru". The ship sank almost immediately and, although there was much wreckage, no survivors were seen.

"Triton" was then ordered to patrol the Truk–Rabaul–New Guinea shipping lanes, north and northwest of New Ireland, arriving on 30 December 1942. On 10 January 1943, "Triton" stalked an unidentified vessel but withheld her attack upon observing it was marked as a hospital ship. Three days later, she fired four torpedoes at a tanker and scored one hit. When the enemy began firing at her periscope, she went deep to begin an end around. About 20 minutes later, the submarine returned to periscope depth and launched a spread of four torpedoes. Two geysers of water rose amidships as high as the target's bridge, but no explosions followed. The next day, "Triton" attempted to attack a freighter, but an escort forced her down where she was subjected to a two-hour depth charge attack. On 16 January, she attacked two cargo ships, scoring two hits on the first and one on the second; but her victims forced her to submerge before she could evaluate the damage. Later that day, "Triton" fired her last three torpedoes at a large freighter but heard no explosions. She then headed for Australia and reached Brisbane on 26 January, with a total of 6,500 tons for the trip. [Blair, p.334. On arrival, Kirkpatrick was detached to become an aid to King, yet another waste of a very productive skipper.]

Final patrol

Falling under the strict tactical control of Admiral James Fife, Jr., [Blair, p.375.] "Triton" (now in the hands of George K. Mackenzie, Jr.) [Blair, p.375.] on 16 February began her sixth and final war patrol, hoping to destroy enemy shipping between the Shortland Basin and Rabaul. She reported smoke on 22 February and a new Japanese radar at Buka. On 6 March, the submarine attacked a convoy of five destroyer-escorted ships, sinking the cargo ship "Kiriha Maru" and damaging another freighter. One of her torpedoes made a circular run, and "Triton" went deep to evade it. She attacked another convoy on the night of 8 March and claimed that five of the eight torpedoes she had fired scored hits. She could not observe the results or make a follow-up attack because gunfire from the escorts forced her down. On 11 March, "Triton" reported she was chasing two convoys, each made up of five or more ships. She was informed USS|Trigger|SS-237|3 was operating in an adjoining area and ordered to stay south of the equator. On 13 March, "Triton" was warned three enemy destroyers in her area were either looking for a convoy or were hunting American submarines.

On 15 March, "Trigger" reported she had attacked a convoy and had been depth charged. Even though attacks on her ceased, she could still hear distant depth charging for about an hour. No further messages from "Triton" were ever received. Post-war examination of Japanese records revealed on 15 March 1943, three Japanese destroyers attacked a submarine a little northwest of "Triton"'s assigned area and subsequently observed an oil slick, debris, and items with American markings. On 10 April 1943, "Triton" was reported overdue from patrol and presumed lost, one of three lost in a month.This gave her 6,500 tons for the trip to Brisbane. [Blair, p.375.]

There are persistent rumors "Triton" was actually lost off Moreton Island near Brisbane, sunk either to friendly fire from an Australian pilot or Japanese mines or torpedoes. Her loss was allegedly covered up by the Australian military.Fact|date=September 2007 It is undisputed two weeks after "Triton" was supposed to have been sunk, a welcoming committee, complete with band, mail delivery, fresh fruit and ice-cream was waiting for her on the dock at New Farm on the Brisbane River; since she could simply have suffered a radio casualty, this is unsurprising. The Australian Defence Department refers inquiries to the Australian War Memorial in Canberra. The Memorial's position is, it was highly unlikely Australian fire had sunk the submarine, and if there had been a cover-up during the war, the truth would have come out in the intervening years.

"Triton" received five battle stars for World War II service.

Notes

References

*Blair, Clay, Jr. "Silent Victory". Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1975.
*Lenton, H.T. "American Submarines". New York: Doubleday & Co., 1973>
*Fitzsimons, Bernard, ed. "Illustrated Encyclopedia of 20th century Weapons and Warfare" (London: Phoebus, 1978), Volume 13, p.1409-10, "I61", and Volume 12, p.1246-7, "Hatsuharu".

The rumors about "Triton"'s loss to friendly fire are laid out at http://ozatwar.com/ozatwar/usstriton.htm

External links

* [http://www.oneternalpatrol.com/uss-triton-201.htm On Eternal Patrol: USS "Triton"]
*cite web | url= http://www.combinedfleet.com/triton.htm
title= Who Sank the Triton?
last= Nevitt | first= Allyn D.
year= 1998 |month= | work= Long Lancers | publisher= Combinedfleet.com
accessdate= 2008-05-26